Synthesis, Characterization, and Pharmacological Evaluation of Selected Aromatic Amines

Ismail, Hammad; Mirza, Bushra; Haq, Ihsan-ul; Shabbir, Muhammad; Akhter, Zareen; Basharat, Amina

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/465286

Journal of Chemistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results and Discussion Conclusion References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 465286 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/465286

Synthesis, Characterization, and Pharmacological Evaluation of Selected Aromatic Amines

Hammad Ismail,¹Bushra Mirza,¹Ihsan-ul Haq,²Muhammad Shabbir,³Zareen Akhter,³and Amina Basharat³

Academic Editor: Shu Taira

Received03 Dec 2014

Revised24 Jan 2015

Accepted25 Jan 2015

Published15 Feb 2015

Abstract

Aromatic amines 1-amino-4-phenoxybenzene (A-1A), 2-(4-aminophenoxy) naphthalene (A-2A), and 1-(4-aminophenoxy) naphthalene (A-3A) were synthesized by the reduction of corresponding nitroaromatics with hydrazine monohydrate and Pd/C 5% (w/w). The newly synthesized compounds were characterized by FTIR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, UV-visible spectrophotometer, and mass spectrometry and their biological activities were investigated along with structurally similar 4-(4-aminophenyloxy) biphenyl (A-A). Results of brine shrimp cytotoxicity assay showed that almost all of the compounds had LD₅₀ values <1 μg/mL. The compounds also showed significant antitumor activity with IC₅₀ values ranging from 67.45 to 12.2 µgmL⁻¹. The cytotoxicity and antitumor studies correlate the results which suggests the anticancerous nature of compounds. During the interaction study of these compounds with DNA, all of the compounds showed hyperchromic effect indicating strong interaction through binding with the grooves of DNA. Moreover, A-3A also showed decrease in confirming higher propensity for DNA groove binding. In DPPH free radical scavenging assay, all the compounds showed potential antioxidant capability. The compounds were highly active in protecting DNA against hydroxyl free radicals. DNA interaction and antioxidant results back up each other indicating that these compounds have potential to be used as cancer chemopreventive agents. Additionally, one compound (A-1A) showed significant antibacterial and antifungal activity as well.

1. Introduction

Aromatic amines are a class of organic compounds in which an amino (–NH₂) group is directly attached to aromatic carbon. These are used for the synthesis of many compounds like azo dyes [1], Schiff’s bases [2], zeolites [3], polyimides, polyamides [4], stationary phase for HPLC [5], epoxy resins [6], and plastics [7]. These compounds also act as a catalyst for the cross-linking of polyester, a stabilizer for phenolic resins, coagulants, and antiknock additives for gasoline and diesel fuel [7]. Due to their biological activities, amines are also named as alkaloids in phytochemistry. Amine group bearing hydrazide hydrazones is a class of compounds possessing numerous biological activities like antitumor, antimycobacterial, antimicrobial, inhibitor of anthrax lethal factor, anti-inflammatory, trypanocidal, leishmanicidal, antidiabetic, and antimalarial agents [8]. Paclitaxel is an amine containing chemotherapy drug that can be used to treat cancers [9].

It is believed that oxidative processes encourage carcinogenesis, even though the mechanisms for this are not well defined [10]. The main mechanism proposed for protective action against harmful oxidative processes is associated with the free radical scavenging activity of antioxidant compounds [11]. The antioxidants may cause the deterioration of premalignant tumors and inhibit their expansion into cancer [10]. Initial studies have reported that some antioxidants, like β-carotene, may be of advantage in the treatment of precancerous circumstances such as oral leukoplakia, probably a precursor of oral cancer [10].

It is of immense help to recognize the structural properties of DNA, the cause of some diseases, and mechanism of some antivirus and antitumor drugs, to design efficient and new DNA targeted drugs to deal with diseases [12]. A drug can interact with DNA by two ways, either by intercalation or as grooves binders. Grooves binders drugs interact with DNA either at minor groove or at major groove. While binding with minor groove, the drug interacts with walls of the groove and hydrogen bonding is established or electrostatic interactions occur with the bases and the phosphate backbone. On the other hand, drug establishes hydrogen bonding with major groove, forming a triple helix of DNA [13]. Both groove binders and intercalating agents are typified as antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and antitumor agents [14–16].

In the present study, new aromatic amines were synthesized and biological potential was evaluated along with one previously reported compound (A-A) [17] due to structural similarity. These compounds were screened by using brine shrimp cytotoxicity assay followed by potato disc antitumor assay, antibacterial assay, antifungal assay, DPPH free radical scavenging assay, and DNA damage assay. Also these compounds were investigated for the interaction with DNA to understand their possible mechanism of action in cancer chemoprevention.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

All the reagents used were of analytical grade. Pd/C 5% (w/w), hydrazine monohydrate (≥98%), and ethanol (≥97%) were used as acquired from supplier. 4-(4-Nitrophenyloxy) biphenyl, 1-nitro-4-phenoxybenzene, 2-(4-nitrophenoxy) naphthalene, and 1-(4-nitrophenoxy) naphthalene used were synthesized by our research group and were recrystallized for further use. Solvents used were dried and purified according to standard procedures [18]. The reactions were carried out in an inert atmosphere by purging dry N₂ gas. The pace of reactions and purity of products were checked by thin layer chromatography on precoated Kieselgel 60HF TLC plates. Elemental analysis was carried out on a CHNS 932 (Leco, USA) elemental analyzer. Melting points were determined on Gallen Kamp apparatus and are uncorrected. Infrared measurements (4000–400 cm⁻¹) were taken on Thermoscientific NICOLET 6700 FTIR spectrophotometer. ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker 300 MHz NMR spectrophotometer in deuterated chloroform using tetramethylsilane as internal reference. GC-MS spectra were recorded in methanol on a micromass platform II instrument.

2.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Aromatic Amines

Aromatic amines were synthesized by a reported procedure [19]. Mixture of corresponding nitroaromatic compound, hydrazine monohydrate, and Pd/C 5% (w/w) was refluxed in ethanol for 18 hours in 250 mL flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer under an inert atmosphere created by purging dry nitrogen. After the completion of reaction, Pd/C was removed by filtering the hot mixture. Concentrating the filtrate on rotary evaporator resulted in precipitation. The precipitates were separated by filtration and recrystallized from methanol [20] (Scheme 1).

2.2.1. Synthesis of 1-Amino-4-phenoxybenzene (A-1A)

1-Amino-4-phenoxybenzene (A-1A) was synthesized using 2.00 g (9.30 mmol) 1-nitro-4-phenoxybenzene, 5.00 mL hydrazine monohydrate, and 0.05 g Pd/C 5% (w/w).

Color: yellow, Yield 79%, melting point 83°C. FT-IR: (υ/cm⁻¹) (N–H) 3391(asym) 3315(sym), (C–O–C) 1225, (aromatic C=C) 1597. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, δ ppm): 3.99(2H, s, NH₂), 7.33–6.57 (m, aromatic ring protons, ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, δ ppm): 159.44, 145.93, 130.12, 122.17, 121.39, 118.47, 116.85, 115.334, MS (m/z): 185(M⁺) CHN found (calcd) for C₁₂H₁₁NO: C: 77.89 (77.84), H: 5.87 (5.95), N: 7.52 (7.57), UV-vis: (nm) 241.

2.2.2. Synthesis of 2-(4-Aminophenoxy) Naphthalene (A-2A)

2-(4-Aminophenoxy) naphthalene (A-2A) was prepared by mixing 2.00 g (6.94 mmol) 2-(4-nitrophenoxy) naphthalene, 5.00 mL hydrazine monohydrate, and 0.05 g Pd/C 5% (w/w), following the general procedure for synthesis of aromatic amines as outlined in Section 2.2.

Color: reddish brown, Yield 75%, melting point 116°C. FTIR: (υ/cm⁻¹) (N–H) 3393(asym) 3323(sym), (C–O–C) 1247, (aromatic C=C) 1622, ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, δ ppm): 4.04(2H, s, NH₂), 7.89–6.23(m, aromatic ring protons), ¹³C NMR(CDCl₃, δppm): 157.49, 146.17, 145.81, 134.43, 130.20, 129.48, 128.02, 127.23, 126.98, 124.56, 121.59, 119.24, 110.85. MS (m/z): 235(M⁺) CHN found (calcd) for C₁₆H₁₃NO: C: 81.44 (81.07), H: 5.51 (5.53), N: 5.92 (5.96), UV-vis: (nm), 222.

2.2.3. Synthesis of 1-(4-Aminophenoxy) Naphthalene (A-3A)

1-(4-Aminophenoxy) naphthalene (A-3A) was prepared by reaction of 2.00 g (6.94 mmol) 1-(4-nitrophenoxy) naphthalene, 5.00 mL hydrazine monohydrate, and 0.05 g Pd/C 5% (w/w) under the conditions maintained for the synthesis of 2-(4-aminophenoxy) naphthalene (A-2A).

Color: brown, Yield 74%, melting point 55°C, FT-IR: (υ/cm⁻¹) (N–H) 3400(asym), 3327(sym), (C–O–C) 1242, (aromatic C=C) 1592. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, δ ppm): 4.01(2H, s, NH₂), 8.25–6.61 (m, aromatic ring protons), ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, δ ppm): 155.25, 146.29, 146.07, 134.83, 128.10, 127.11, 126.50, 125.77, 121.94, 121.85, 121.31, 115.40, 110.10, MS (m/z): 235(M⁺) CHN found (calcd) for C₁₆H₁₃NO: C: 81.84 (81.07), H: 5.59 (5.53), N: 5.94 (5.96), UV-vis: (nm) 215.

2.3. Biological Assays

2.3.1. Brine Shrimp Cytotoxicity Assay

Brine shrimp cytotoxicity assay was used to determine the toxicity of the compounds [21]. Artemia salina (brine shrimp) eggs (Ocean Star Inc., USA) were hatched in seawater (34 gL⁻¹). After 24 h, ten shrimps were transferred to each vial using Pasteur pipette. The compounds with final concentrations of 10, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.0625 μgmL⁻¹ were added and the volume was raised up to 5 mL of artificial seawater. Vincristine sulphate was used as positive control and DMSO was used as negative control. The experiment was performed in triplicate and vials were incubated under illumination at 28°C. After 24 h, survivors were counted and LD₅₀ (lethal dose) values were calculated by using the Finney software [22].

2.3.2. Potato Disc Antitumor Assay

Potato disc antitumor method [23] was used to test the antitumor activity of the compounds. Inoculum was prepared with three concentrations (10, 100, and 1000 μgmL⁻¹) of sample containing Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Potatoes were surface sterilized with 0.1% mercuric chloride and 5 mm × 8 mm potatoes cylinders were placed on agar plates. Then 50 μL of inoculum was applied to the top of each disc (10 discs per plate). Vincristine sulphate was used as positive control and DMSO was used as negative control. Experiment was performed in triplicate and plates were placed at 28°C. After 28 days, discs were stained with Lugol’s solution (10% KI and 5% I₂) and the number of tumors was counted. Percentage inhibition was determined as follows: where is average number of tumors of test sample and is average number of tumors of −ve control.

2.3.3. DNA-Drug Interaction Assay

Interaction of compounds with DNA was studied by using UV spectrophotometer method [24] with little modifications. InnuPREP blood DNA mini kit (Analytik Jena) was used for the extraction of genomic DNA from human blood and concentration was calculated at 260 nm by applying the extinction coefficient of 6600 M⁻¹cm⁻¹ [25]. The working DNA solution (100 mM) was prepared and all the compounds were dissolved in SM (solvent mixture, consisting of methanol and water 9 : 1). Molar concentrations of compounds were adjusted on the spectrophotometer to ensure that absorbance was between 0.1 and 1 at so that Beer-Lambert law could be applied. The spectrum was recorded and, to this, DNA was stepwise added starting from the lowest concentration to higher concentrations (0.5 × 10⁻⁶, 1 × 10⁻⁶, 0.5 × 10⁻⁵, and 1 × 10⁻⁵ M) keeping the compound concentration in the reaction mixture constant. To attain the stable interaction, reaction mixture was allowed to stay for 5 min before each measurement. SM was used as blank and spectra were recorded in the form of spectral peaks.

2.3.4. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay

Radical scavenging activity of compounds was determined spectrophotometrically [26] at 200, 66.6, 22.4, 7.4, and 2.4 μgmL⁻¹ final concentration. DPPH (0.1 mM) was prepared in methanol. Ascorbic acid and DMSO were used as positive and negative control, respectively. Each concentration was assayed in triplicate and reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C in the dark. After 30 minutes, absorbance was measured at 517 nm on a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Agilent 8453, G1103A). The percent scavenging of DPPH free radical for each concentration of each test compound was calculated by the following formula: where is absorbance of control and is absorbance of test sample.

2.3.5. DNA Damage Assay

DNA protection activity of the compounds against oxidative DNA damage was evaluated in vitro by DNA damage assay [12, 27]. The reaction was carried out in a PCR tube with 15 μL of total volume having 3 μL pBR322 DNA (0.5 μg), 3 μL of 2 mM FeSO₄, 4 μL of 30% H₂O₂, and 5 μL of tested compound with 1000, 100, and 10 μgmL⁻¹ final concentration. A positive control was used which contains pBR322 DNA treated with 2 mM FeSO₄ + 30% H₂O₂, and untreated pBR322 DNA was used as negative control (P). A control containing compound and untreated pBR322 (C + P) was also used to check the damaging or protective effect of compound on DNA. Then the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. All reaction mixtures were subjected to 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in 1X TBE buffer using 1 kb ladder (L). Gels were analyzed by scanning with Gel-Doc (Bio Rad) computer program and intensity of the bands was determined.

2.3.6. Antibacterial Assay (96-Well Plate Method)

Antibacterial activity of compounds was determined by “microtiter plate method” [28] with minor modifications. Five strains of bacteria two Gram positive (Micrococcus luteus (ATCC 10240) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538)) and three Gram negative (Bordetella bronchiseptica (ATCC 4617), Escherichia coli (ATCC 15224), and Enterobacter aerogenes (ATCC 13048)) cultured in nutrient broth at 37°C for 24 h were used. A sterile 96-well plate was labeled and serial dilutions were performed with 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.12, and 1.56 μgmL⁻¹ final concentration. Then 190 μL of bacterial inoculum was added to each well compared with McFarland turbidity standard. A column with a broad spectrum antibiotic as positive control (kanamycin sulfate), negative control (DMSO), and blank (nutrient broth) were used on each plate. The experiment was performed in triplicate and incubated at 37°C. After 24 h, to each well 20 μL of TTC indicator solution was added and plates were incubated at 37°C for 15–20 minutes and change in colour was determined visually. Colour change from red to pink was recorded as negative (viable bacteria) and no colour change was considered as positive (dead bacteria). The lowest concentration at which no colour change appeared was taken as MIC value.

2.3.7. Antifungal Assay (6-Well Plate Dilution Method)

The compounds were screened for their antifungal activity by agar plate dilution method [29] with modifications. Two strains Aspergillus flavus (FCBP 0064) and Fusarium solani (FCBP 0291) cultured on SDA at 28°C for 24 h were used. Test compound with 200, 100, 50, 25, and 12.5 μgmL⁻¹ final concentration was poured in each well of 6-well plate. After solidification each well was inoculated with 4 mm fungal mycelia. Terbinafine and DMSO served as positive control and negative control, respectively. Plates were incubated at 28°C for 24 h. Antifungal activity was calculated by measuring the growth diameter of fungus and MIC value was taken as the lowest concentration at which no growth appeared.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Spectral Characterization

3.1.1. FTIR Spectroscopy

The FTIR spectra of aromatic amines (A-1A, A-2A, and A-3A) exhibited characteristic broad absorption bands at 1225–1242 cm⁻¹ due to C–O–C vibration, 1587–1608 cm⁻¹ due to of aromatic ring vibrations, and 3391–3468 (asymmetric) and 3315–3372 (symmetric) cm⁻¹ because of N–H stretching bands [30].

3.1.2. ¹H and ¹³C NMR Spectral Analysis

The ¹H NMR spectra showed characteristic signals in the region 4.62–3.63 ppm corresponding to primary aromatic amine protons. Phenyl protons are present in all the compounds which are verified by the appearance of multiplets at 8.25–6.23 ppm according to the substituents attached. The characteristic singlets at 3.99, 4.04, and 4.01 ppm were due to resonance of amino group protons (–NH₂) whereas phenyl protons appeared as multiplets in the ranges of 7.33–6.57, 7.89–6.23, and 8.25–6.61 ppm for A-1A, A-2A, and A-3A, respectively.

¹³C NMR spectroscopic studies also confirmed the formation of all the aromatic amines. The carbon atoms of the aromatic rings attached directly to the oxygen atoms of ether linkage were strongly deshielded showing downfield signals at 157.62, 157.49, and 155.25 ppm for A-1A, A-2A, and A-3A, respectively [31].

3.1.3. Mass Spectral Studies

The mass spectral data of the aromatic amines confirms their formation as molecular ion peaks are obtained at (m/z) 185 for A-1A and 235 for A-2A and A-3A. The mass spectra of the compounds display molecular ions as base peaks.

3.2. Biological Evaluation

3.2.1. Brine Shrimp Cytotoxicity Assay

To screen out the biologically active compounds, brine shrimp cytotoxicity assay was performed and results are summarized in Table 1. Brine shrimp cytotoxicity assay serves as prescreen test for the identification of bioactive compounds to evaluate anticancer potential of any compound. All the tested compounds are highly cytotoxic with LD₅₀ value as low as 0.16 μgmL⁻¹ (Table 1). It is important to note that these compounds are more potent than the vincristine sulphate (positive control) which means that these compounds have strong potential for the anticancer screening.

3.2.2. Potato Disc Antitumor Assay

As the compounds showed good cytotoxic activity, in the prescreen assay, they were screened for possible antitumor activity by using potato disc tumor assay and results are summarized in Table 2. The compounds A-A, A-1A, and A-2A showed significant antitumor activity with IC₅₀ values 30.47, 67.45, and 12.2 μgmL⁻¹, respectively. The results were compared with that of the positive control, vincristine sulphate (5.1 μgmL⁻¹), which predicts the anticancer nature of compounds.

3.2.3. DNA-Drug Interaction Assay

For the evaluation of the potential of an anticancerous compound, study of its binding to the DNA is the key step of drug innovation. The drug binding to DNA has been characterized through absorption titrations [32]. Generally, when drugs intercalate with DNA, blue shift or red shift is observed in the absorption spectra [33]. Additionally, increase or decrease in absorbance is also observed when drugs bind with the grooves of DNA [34]. Initially, UV-spectra of the compounds in SM (solvent mixture) consisting of methanol and water (9 : 1) were recorded in terms of . The compound A-3A showed hyperchromic effect along with blue shift of 15 nm which is indicative of higher susceptibility for intercalation with DNA. Furthermore, all of the compounds A-A, A-1A, A-2A, and A-3A with 206, 241, 222, and 215 nm, respectively, showed hyperchromism with increasing the concentrations of the DNA (Figure 1), suggesting their groove binding property. Groove binding compounds are of practical importance for the development of new anticancer agents because they localize in the nuclear DNA of whole cells and possess a profile of promising biological activity [35]. It has been reported previously that the interaction of copper(II) complex with DNA by increase in DNA concentration results in hyperchromic effect. This spectral change might be indicative of groove binding as the organic ligand-copper coordination facilitates the formation of Van der Waals contacts or hydrogen bonds during interaction with DNA grooves [36]. In another study two complexes C₁₀H₂₂N₂O₅SnCl₂ and C₁₀H₂₂N₂O₅ZrCl₂ exhibited intraligand absorption bands in the UV. By the addition of increasing amounts of CT-DNA to complexes, a sharp hyperchromic effect in the absorption bands with a moderate red shift of 5 and 3 nm, respectively, was observed. Hyperchromic effect reflects the corresponding changes of DNA in its conformation and structure after the complex-DNA interaction has occurred [37].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.2.4. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay

DPPH free radical scavenging activity of the compounds was evaluated spectrophotometrically at four different concentrations (200, 66.6, 22.2, and 7.4 μgmL⁻¹). All compounds showed significant antioxidant potential with IC₅₀ values of 47.29, 32.50, 61.61, and 59.66 μgmL⁻¹, respectively, in comparison with ascorbic acid (9.6 μgmL⁻¹). Results of this assay are summarized in Table 3.

3.2.5. DNA Damage Assay

Keeping in view the good antioxidant activity, the compounds were screened for their protection against DNA damage assay at three concentrations (1000, 100, and 10 μgmL⁻¹). This assay based on the attack of ^•OH produced from the Fenton reaction and super coiled plasmid DNA is broken into open circular or linear form. By analyzing the intensity of bands formed on 1% agarose gel, results were recorded and tabulated (Table 4, Figures 2 and 3). All the compounds showed significant protection at 1000 and 100 μgmL⁻¹ concentrations, while showing good protection at 10 μgmL⁻¹ concentration. The results indicate that these compounds could be regarded as potential antioxidant and anticancerous agents after further investigation.

3.2.6. Antibacterial Assay

Antibacterial activity was determined through 96-well plate method using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) as indicator which enzymatically reduced to red 1,3,5-triphenylformazan (TPF) in living tissues due to the activity of various dehydrogenases [38]. Kanamycin sulfate was used as positive control and MIC was calculated against B. bronchiseptica (125 μgmL⁻¹), S. aureus (32 μgmL⁻¹), E. aerogenes (30 μgmL⁻¹), M. luteus (32 μgmL⁻¹), and E. coli (32 μgmL⁻¹). The results showed that compound A-1A (Figure 3) exhibited significant antibacterial activity against all the tested strains B. bronchiseptica, S. aureus, E. aerogenes, M. luteus, and E. coli with MIC values of 25, 50, 50, 100, and 100 μgmL⁻¹, respectively. This means that compound A-1A can act as a broad spectrum antibiotic. This is a simple and rapid method from which accurate MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) can be generated.

3.2.7. Antifungal Assay

The compounds were tested for their antifungal activity, using 6-well agar dilution method. Here, we report the use of 6-well plate because the main advantage of the plates is that you can grow six cultures under identical conditions in the same culture plate. Moreover, smaller wells in plates are useful for application of expensive reagents in smaller volumes. Among all the compounds, A-1A showed significant antifungal activity against F. solani and A. flavus with MIC value 12.5 μgmL⁻¹ for both. MIC value for terbinafine was calculated against F. solani (16 μgmL⁻¹) and A. flavus (1 μgmL⁻¹). It is interesting to know that A-1A possesses both significant antibacterial and antifungal activity which means that this compound can be used for dual purpose as antibacterial and antifungal agents.

4. Conclusion

Three new aromatic amines 1-amino-4-phenoxybenzene (A-1A), 2-(4-aminophenoxy) naphthalene (A-2A), and 1-(4-aminophenoxy) naphthalene (A-3A) were prepared in high purity and high yield. In vitro investigation of the four amine compounds showed that activity ranges from being selective (active in one assay) to being broad spectrum (active in all assays). The compound A-1A was active against all the biological assays which means it can be used as a potential candidate for drug development after advanced investigation. The obtained findings showing significant activity in brine shrimp cytotoxicity assay and antitumor assay provide the evidence for a very strong positive correlation between these two assays and for prediction of some valuable anticancerous principles present in these compounds. On the other hand, the compounds showed significant antioxidant activity and DNA protective effect against oxidative damage. Interestingly, in the DNA-drug interaction study, it was observed that these compounds bind with the grooves of DNA which can affect the binding of transcription factors with DNA and ultimately gene expression leading to the antitumor behavior. The findings of this study support the view that some of these compounds can be a promising source of potential antitumor drugs.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

A. Grirrane, A. Corma, and H. García, “Gold-catalyzed synthesis of aromatic azo compounds from anilines and nitroaromatics,” Science, vol. 322, no. 5908, pp. 1661–1664, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. N. Ibrahim and S. A. I. Sharif, “Synthesis, characterization and use of Schiff bases as fluorimetric analytical reagents (part II),” E-Journal of Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 180–184, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tao, H. Kanoh, L. Abrams, and K. Kaneko, “Mesopore-modified zeolites: preparation, characterization, and applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 896–910, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Buch and A. V. R. Reddy, “Synthesis, characterization and thermal properties of soluble aromatic poly(amide imide)s,” Polymer, vol. 46, no. 15, pp. 5524–5532, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gocan, “Stationary phases for thin-layer chromatography,” Journal of Chromatographic Science, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 538–549, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Farhadyar, A. Rahimi, and A. E. Langroudi, “Preparation and characterization of aromatic amine cured epoxy-silica hybrid inorganic-organic coating via in situ sol-gel process,” Iranian Polymer Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Tapase, N. D. Shinde, and D. Shinde, “Microwave synthesis of N-alkyl aromatic amines from $p$ -toluene sulphonamide in presence of phase transfer catalyst,” Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 50–54, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Kumar, B. Narasimhan, D. Sharma, V. Judge, and R. Narang, “Hansch analysis of substituted benzoic acid benzylidene/furan-2-yl-methylene hydrazides as antimicrobial agents,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1853–1863, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Barmore, S. R. Logan, and B. C. van Wagenen, “The addition of amines to diisobutylaluminum-imine complexes. Preparation of NPS R-568 hydrochloride,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 39, no. 21, pp. 3451–3454, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Sithranga Boopathy and K. Kathiresan, “Anticancer drugs from marine flora: an overview,” Journal of Oncology, vol. 2010, Article ID 214186, 18 pages, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Gomes, T. Girão Da Cruz, J. L. Andrade, N. Milhazes, F. Borges, and M. P. M. Marques, “Anticancer activity of phenolic acids of natural or synthetic origin: a structure-activity study,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 25, pp. 5395–5401, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Arshad, U. Yunus, S. Razzque et al., “Electrochemical and spectroscopic investigations of isoniazide and its analogs with ds.DNA at physiological pH: evaluation of biological activities,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 452–461, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Shah, R. Qureshi, A. M. Khan, R. A. Khera, and F. L. Ansari, “Electrochemical behavior of 1-ferrocenyl-3-phenyl-2-propen-1-one on glassy carbon electrode and evaluation of its interaction parameters with DNA,” Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 447–451, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
L. M. Wilhelmsson, N. Kingi, and J. Bergman, “Interactions of antiviral indolo[2,3-b]quinoxaline derivatives with DNA,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 24, pp. 7744–7750, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Shahabuddin, M. Gopal, and S. C. Raghavan, “Intercalating and antitumour activity of 4-Oxopyrimido[4′;,5′:4,5]thieno(2,3-b)quinoline-4(3H)-one,” Journal of Cancer Molecules, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 139–146, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Usha, I. M. Johnson, and R. Malathi, “Modulation of DNA intercalation by resveratrol and genistein,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 284, no. 1-2, pp. 57–64, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Siddiqi, A. Afzal, S. Sajid, and Z. Akhter, “Synthesis, characterization and thermal oxidative stability of rigid epoxy polymers cured from aromatic mono- and di-amines,” Journal of Polymer Research, vol. 20, no. 2, article 41, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. I. Vogel, Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, Longman, London, UK, 5th edition, 1989.
J. K. Im and J. C. Jung, “Synthesis and properties of polyimides derived from N-[4-(4- aminophenyloxy)phenyl]-4-aminophthalimide,” Polymer, vol. 41, no. 24, pp. 8709–8716, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Jung and S.-B. Park, “Synthesis and characterization of polyimides from imidazole-blocked 2,5-bis[(n-alkyloxy)methyl]-1,4-benzene diisocyanates and pyromellitic dianhydride,” Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 357–365, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Z. Siddiqui, M. A. Abbasi, M. Aziz-ur-Rehman et al., “Synthesis pharmacological evaluation, molecular docking and cytotoxicty studies on some n-substituted 5-[(4-chlorophenoxy)methyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2yl-2-sulfanyl acetamides,” Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 4, no. 8, p. 3603, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
D. J. Finney, Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1971.
View at: MathSciNet
G.-F. Qi, Z.-Y. Yang, and D.-D. Qin, “Synthesis, characterization and DNA-binding properties of the Cu(II) complex with 7-methoxychromone-3-carbaldehyde-benzoylhydrazone,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 69–73, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Liu, S. Liu, Y. Wang et al., “Synthesis, cytotoxicity, and DNA-binding property of berberine derivatives,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1899–1907, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ullah, F. L. Ansari, S. Nazir, and B. Mirza, “Combinatorial synthesis, lead identification, and antitumor study of a chalcone-based positional-scanning library,” Chemistry & Biodiversity, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 203–214, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Haq, Z. Akhter, S. Yameen, H. M. Siddiqi, B. Mirza, and A. Rifat, “Synthesis and biological evaluations of some Schiff-base esters of ferrocenyl aniline and simple aniline,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 694, no. 14, pp. 2198–2203, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Pal, V. Kumar, A. K. Gupta, V. Beniwal, and G. K. Gupta, “Synthesis, characterization, and DNA cleavage study of dehydroacetic acid based tridentate Schiff's base and its metal complexes of first transition series,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 4060–4069, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. D. Sarker, L. Nahar, and Y. Kumarasamy, “Microtitre plate-based antibacterial assay incorporating resazurin as an indicator of cell growth, and its application in the in vitro antibacterial screening of phytochemicals,” Methods, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 321–324, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. I. Choudhary, D. Shahwar, Z. Parveen, A. Jabbar, I. Ali, and A. Rahman, “Antifungal steroidal lactones from Withania coagulance,” Phytochemistry, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1243–1246, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Butt, Z. Akhter, M. Zafar-uz-Zaman, and H. M. Siddiqi, “Synthesis and characterization of some Schiff-base-containing polyimides,” Colloid and Polymer Science, vol. 286, no. 12, pp. 1455–1461, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Butt, Z. Akhtar, M. Zafar-uz-Zaman, and A. Munir, “Synthesis and characterization of some novel aromatic polyimides,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1638–1646, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Carter, M. Rodriguez, and A. J. Bard, “Voltammetric studies of the interaction of metal chelates with DNA. 2. Tris-chelated complexes of cobalt(III) and iron(II) with 1,10-phenanthroline and 2,2′-bipyridine,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 111, no. 24, pp. 8901–8911, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Meneghini, “Iron homeostasis, oxidative stress, and DNA damage,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 783–792, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Tian and Y. Hua, “Concentration-dependence of prooxidant and antioxidant effects of aloin and aloe-emodin on DNA,” Food Chemistry, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 413–418, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. P. Reddy, S. M. Sondhi, and J. W. Lown, “Synthetic DNA minor groove-binding drugs,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 1–111, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dey, S. Sarkar, H. Paul, E. Zangrando, and P. Chattopadhyay, “Copper(II) complex with tridentate N donor ligand: Synthesis, crystal structure, reactivity and DNA binding study,” Polyhedron, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1583–1587, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Arjmand and A. Jamsheera, “DNA binding studies of new valine derived chiral complexes of tin(IV) and zirconium(IV),” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Brown, A. H. M. van Vliet, R. P. Betts, and M. Reuter, “Tetrazolium reduction allows assessment of biofilm formation by Campylobacter jejuni in a food matrix model,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 1212–1221, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Hammad Ismail et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

6563

Downloads

2778

Citations

Journal of Chemistry

Synthesis, Characterization, and Pharmacological Evaluation of Selected Aromatic Amines

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

2.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Aromatic Amines

2.2.1. Synthesis of 1-Amino-4-phenoxybenzene (A-1A)

2.2.2. Synthesis of 2-(4-Aminophenoxy) Naphthalene (A-2A)

2.2.3. Synthesis of 1-(4-Aminophenoxy) Naphthalene (A-3A)

2.3. Biological Assays

2.3.1. Brine Shrimp Cytotoxicity Assay

2.3.2. Potato Disc Antitumor Assay

2.3.3. DNA-Drug Interaction Assay

2.3.4. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay

2.3.5. DNA Damage Assay

2.3.6. Antibacterial Assay (96-Well Plate Method)

2.3.7. Antifungal Assay (6-Well Plate Dilution Method)

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Spectral Characterization

3.1.1. FTIR Spectroscopy

3.1.2. 1H and 13C NMR Spectral Analysis

3.1.3. Mass Spectral Studies

3.2. Biological Evaluation

3.2.1. Brine Shrimp Cytotoxicity Assay

3.2.2. Potato Disc Antitumor Assay

3.2.3. DNA-Drug Interaction Assay

3.2.4. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay

3.2.5. DNA Damage Assay

3.2.6. Antibacterial Assay

3.2.7. Antifungal Assay

4. Conclusion

Conflict of Interests

References

Copyright

3.1.2. ¹H and ¹³C NMR Spectral Analysis