Physicochemical Quality Parameters at the Reception of the Honey Packaging Process: Influence of Type of Honey, Year of Harvest, and Beekeeper
Table 1
Descriptive statistics for moisture, colour, and HMF for each variety of honey and year of harvesting. ANOVA results (-ratio and significant differences) obtained for two factors: type of honey and year of harvest.
Type of honey
HMF (mg/kg)
Moisture (g/100 g)
Colour (Pfund scale)
Mean
SD
Min
Max
Mean
SD
Min
Max
Mean
SD
Min
Max
Orange blossom
4.6de
6.4
<0.5
37.9
18.7c
1.3
15.5
23.3
27a
17
2
62
Lemon tree
2.1ab
2.3
<0.5
10.3
18.3b
1.5
15.0
21.6
26a
14
1
69
Rosemary
3.2bc
3.2
<0.5
27.3
19.9d
2.1
15.0
25.0
25a
15
0
50
Sunflower
3.3bc
4.3
<0.5
37.4
16.7a
1.3
14.6
21.2
70d
10
38
72
Thyme
4.1bcd
7.2
<0.5
35.6
19.5d
1.6
16.2
22.9
66cd
21
18
90
Lavender
6.1d
6.2
<0.5
22.9
17.9ab
2.2
15.7
25.2
48b
21
6
91
Lavender stoechas
3.4abcde
3.5
<0.5
10.2
16.5a
1.0
15.2
18.1
66cd
13
36
78
Retama
1.0a
1.7
<0.5
7.4
16.4a
0.7
14.7
17.5
84e
10
63
120
Eucalyptus
3.8cd
2.7
<0.5
9.7
16.6a
0.8
15.1
19.8
70d
11
35
89
Honeydew
4.5de
3.1
<0.5
27.2
16.5a
1.4
13.9
22.0
90e
13
57
127
Polyfloral
4.5cd
4.8
<0.5
39.8
17.7ab
1.8
14.8
24.1
64c
19
7
130
ANOVA -ratio
Year of harvest
HMF
Moisture
Colour
Mean
SD
Min
Max
Mean
SD
Min
Max
Mean
SD
Min
Max
2009
3.1a
3.4
<0.5
19.4
17.1ª
1.5
14.8
24.0
72e
18
13
130
2010
5.0c
5.9
<0.5
37.9
18.0bc
1.7
15.0
23.6
62d
24
10
127
2011
4.0b
4.8
<0.5
37.4
18.2cd
2.0
13.9
25.0
51c
27
2
125
2012
2.9a
3.6
<0.5
26.8
18.4d
1.9
15.5
25.2
47b
27
3
120
2013
4.1bc
6.2
<0.5
39.8
17.9b
1.7
14.2
22.1
40ª
26
0
110
ANOVA -ratio
. For each factor, different letters in each column indicate homogeneous groups (significant differences at 95% confidence level as obtained by the LSD test).