Journal of Chemistry

Journal of Chemistry / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 951840 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/951840

Muhammad Asam Raza, Durre Shahwar, Tania Khan, "Radical Scavenging, Proteases Activities, and Phenolics Composition of Bark Extracts from 21 Medicinal Plants", Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2015, Article ID 951840, 8 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/951840

Radical Scavenging, Proteases Activities, and Phenolics Composition of Bark Extracts from 21 Medicinal Plants

Academic Editor: Alberto Ritieni
Received31 Oct 2014
Revised07 Jan 2015
Accepted06 Feb 2015
Published16 Mar 2015

Abstract

Stem barks derived from twenty-one medicinal plants were extracted in methanol (100%) and acetone-water (70 : 30 v/v) and at room as well as at reflux temperature conditions. Total phenolic contents, determined using FC (Folin Ciocalteu) reagent, ranged from 528 to 715 mg GAE/g of crude extract. 15 out of 21 plants showed DPPH activity more than 90% and the rest of plants exhibited the activity in the range of 87–89%. The methanolic extract of P. granatum obtained at room temperature showed the highest antiradical activity (96%). The extracts with similar % radical scavenging of DPP showed significant variation in EC50 value. Radical scavenging activity of E. rostrata, M. champaca, A. modesta, P. roxburghii, P. longifolia, E. suberosa, and F. infectoria was evaluated for the first time. A strong correlation between total phenols and antiradical activity was exhibited with R values ranging from 0.7580 to 0.8874 indicating a linear relationship The extracts phenolic composition was studied by HPLC. All extracts showed remarkable antioxidant activity (87 to 96%) while moderate activity was exhibited against protease (22 to 56%). Gallic acid, tannic acid, quercetin, rutin, catechin, hesperidin, and cinnamic acid were identified as the major phenolic acids in the extracts of selected medicinal plants.

1. Introduction

The human body may produce oxygen-centered free radicals and other reactive oxygen species as by-products during physiological and biochemical processes. Overproduction of such free radicals causes oxidative damage to biomolecule (e.g., lipid, protein, and DNA) leading to chronic diseases, for example, cancer, arthritis, atherosclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and diabetes [1, 2]. On the other hand, lipid peroxidation is one of the main reasons for deterioration in food products.

Synthetic antioxidants such as BHT, BHA, TBHQ, and PG are usually used to overcome this problem. Most of these synthetic antioxidants are found to have toxic and carcinogenic effects on human health [3]. Several reports [46] reveal that natural compounds are capable of protecting against reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediated damage. Therefore, natural compounds may have potential application in prevention and curing of diseases [7].

The antioxidant constituents of plants are gaining the interest of scientists and food manufactures because the future demand is functional food with specific health effects. The antioxidant property of plant extracts has been attributed to their polyphenol contents. They improve the defensive system of plants against infection and injury. They are usually found as glycosylated derivatives or as salt with inorganic sulfates or organic acids [8]. They play a key role as antioxidants due to the presence of hydroxyl constituents and their aromatic nature which enable them to act as reducing agents, hydrogen donors, and singlet oxygen quenchers. In addition, they have a metal chelation potential [9].

To assess radicals scavenging ability, different in vitro methods have been used such as ABTS [10], DPPH [11], and DMPA [12]. Although these assays do not reproduce in vivo conditions but are useful to rank antioxidant activity of substances. In this paper, DPPH method has been applied to the bark extracts of the selected medicinal plants. UV-Vis spectrum of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydrazyl free radical () shows a characteristic absorbance close to 515 nm in methanol. This method presents the advantage of using stable and commercially available free radical and has been extensively applied on plant extracts and on various food materials [13, 14].

In the field of pharmaceutical research, enzyme inhibition is an important area which has resulted in the discovery of a number of useful drugs. Specific inhibitors interact with enzymes and block their activity towards their corresponding physiological substrates. The importance of enzyme inhibitors as drugs is enormous, since these molecules have been used for treating a large number of physiological conditions. Plant derived protease inhibitors serve in the defense mechanisms of plants against pests and plant pathogens. These inhibitors can be classified into a number of families on the basis of their specificities to inhibit the cleavage of specific peptide sequences within the proteins.

Proteases refer to a group of enzymes, whose catalytic function is to hydrolyze peptide bond of protein. They play a key role in a variety of biological processes, both at the physiological level and in infection. Proteases are classified into serine, threonine, cysteine, aspartate, and glutamic acid proteases. Most widely studied group of proteases is serine proteases and many pathological disorders are caused by deficiencies in the normally exquisite regulation of the activity of proteolytic enzymes, resulting in abnormal tissue destruction and the aberrant processing of other proteins. Elastase, chymotrypsin, and trypsin are the subclass of serine proteases based on the type of substrate. Trypsin cleaves polypeptide chains on the C-terminal side of a positively charged side-chain containing arginine or lysine.

Acacia nilotica (Fabaceae) is used for cold, bronchitis, diarrhoea, dysentery, biliousness, bleeding piles, and leucoderma [15]. Acacia modesta commonly known as “Phulai” is chewed and sucked for gastric pain. Albizzia lebbeck (Mimosaceae) is used against cataract, asthma, ophthalmopathy, leprosy, diarrhea, and all types of poisoning [16]. Antiallergic [17], anti-inflammatory [18], and anticonvulsant [19] activities of this plant have also been documented. Cassia fistula (Fabaceae) has a high therapeutic value and is used to cure anorexia, rheumatism, inflammatory diseases, and skin disorders and as an analgesic. Besides, it also finds use in the treatment of haematemesis, pruritus, leucoderma, and diabetes. The hepatoprotective activity [20] and the hypoglycemic activity [21] have also been reported. Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Lauraceae) showed many biological properties as analgesic, antiseptic, antispasmodic, aphrodisiac, astringent, carminative, insecticide, and parasiticide. It has mildly astringent and aromatic properties and is used in European medicine. It has a place for the treatment of colic and diarrhea [22]. Different parts of Eucalyptus rostrata (Myrtaceae) are used in traditional medicine for the treatment of diarrhea, relaxed throats, chronic dysentery, malaria, infection of the upper respiratory tract, and certain skin diseases, and as an astringent in dentistry and for cuts [23]. According to Ayurveda and Unani system of medication, Eugenia jambolana (Myrtaceae) is sweet, digestive, astringent, used to cure bronchitis, asthma, dysentery, and ulcers. Its external use shows good wound healing properties [24].

Ficus (Moraceae) are being used traditionally in a wide variety of ethnomedical remedies all over the world [25]. Mangifera indica (Anacardiaceae) possesses various pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, hepatoprotective, and hypoglycemic activities. Mangiferin isolated from M. indica is effective in against herpes simplex virus type 2 in vitro. It also possesses immunomodulatory action [26]. Michelia champaca (Magnoliaceae) is used in the treatment of brain disorders fever, colic, leprosy, and postpartum protection, in childbirth, and as febrifuge. It is also used as anti-inflammatory and antipyretic agent [27]. Various parts of Mimusops elengi (Sapotaceae) have been used as a febrifuge, astringent, purgative, and stimulant [28]. The pounded seeds pasted with oil are used for the treatment of obstinate constipation [29]. Punica granatum (Punicaceae) is used to treat stomach ache and laxative and respiratory pathologies in traditional medicine [30]. Psidium guajava (Myrtaceae) is used as antidiarrhoeal, gastroenteritis, dysentery, antibacterial, colic, and pathogenic germs of the intestine [31]. Polyalthia longifolia (Annonaceae) is used as a febrifuge and depressed the heart, lowered blood pressure, and stimulated respiration [32]. The fungicidal effect of P. longifolia has also been reported by many workers [33]. Zizyphus jujuba (Rhamnaceae) possess multiple medicinal properties such as antifertility, analgesic, and antidiabetes [34].

The aim of this study was to screen the bark extracts with respect to their total phenolic contents, radical scavenging, and proteases activity in order to find new potential drugs from natural sources.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (FC), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and HPLC standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Solvents and butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) of analytical grade were purchased from Panerac (Spain). Nα-benzoyl-DL-arginine-paranitroanilide-HCL (BApNA), trypsin from bovine serum, and DMSO were purchased from Fluka (Germany). All other chemicals and reagents of analytical grade were from Merck (Germany).

2.2. Extraction of Phenolic Compounds

Plant materials were collected in January 2012, from Azad Kashmir region, Pakistan, and identified at the Department of Botany, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, while the bark of C. zeylanicum and A. catechu was purchased from local market. The bark was shade-dried, pulverized, grinded to powder, and extracted (50 gm) with 100% methanol and acetone-water (70 : 30) separately at room temperature for seven days and at reflux temperature for five hours (500 mL each). The crude extracts were filtered and concentrated at reduced pressure by using rotary evaporator.

2.3. Determination of Total Phenols

Total phenols in extracts were determined using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent [35]. 40 μL of each sample (2 mg/mL) was mixed with 0.25 mL of FC reagent and 0.8 mL of 10% sodium carbonate solution. The mixture was allowed to stand for 30 min and the absorbance was measured at 765 nm. The total phenolic contents were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in mg/g of crude extract. Correlation studies between total phenolic contents and % scavenging of DPPH were performed.

2.4. Radical Scavenging Assay

The radical scavenging ability of extracts was measured using the method of Majinda et al. [36]. Methanolic solution (1.0 mL) of all the extracts (2 mg/mL) was added to 1.0 mL (0.2 mg/mL) methanol solution of and absorbance was measured at 517 nm after thirty minutes.

The % scavenging of was determined by the following formula:The amount of the sample was also determined by measuring decrease in absorbance at 517 nm to half of the initial value as EC50. Gallic acid and BHT were used as standard reference.

2.5. Protease Inhibition Assay

All the extracts were subjected to protease inhibition assay according to the method of Jedinák et al. [37], with some modification. Tris buffer (100 mM) of pH 7.5 was prepared by dissolving 12.1 g of Tris (hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane in distilled water and adjusted pH 7.5 with HCl (5 M). The stock solution of trypsin was prepared by dissolving 2 mg of trypsin in 10 mL of 1.0 mM HCl. Nα-benzoyl-DL-arginine-paranitroanilide hydrochloride (BApNA) was dissolved in DMSO (20 mg/mL). Enzyme (0.3 mL) and inhibitor (100 μL) was incubated at 37°C for 15 minutes and then 0.6 mM substrate was added and final volume was made 2.5 mL with Tris buffer. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. The reaction was quenched by adding 100 μL of acetic acid (30%) and read the absorbance at 410 nm using UV/Vis spectrophotometer. Phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride (PMSF) was used as positive inhibitor:

2.6. High Performance Liquid Chromatography

Qualitative analysis of all plant extracts was carried out with high performance liquid chromatograph, HPLC-DAD system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) consisting of LC-20A pump, DGU-20A degasser, SPD M-20A diode array detector, a manual sample injector with a 20 μL sampling loop (Rheodyne, Cottati, CA, USA), and CTO-20 A column oven. Data was integrated by using HPLC 20A software. The measurements were performed at room temperature using reverse-phase Merck C-18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase was a mixture of methanol, water, and acetic acid (50 : 48 : 2) with isocratic elution. The elution flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, duration of analysis was 20.0 min, and UV detector was tuned to 254 nm. For the sample preparation, 5.0 mg of extract and for standard 0.05 mg were dissolved separately in 5 mL of mobile phase.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements. Duncan’s multiple range tests were used to determine differences at each point which were considered significant at .

3. Results and Discussion

The bark powder of the selected medicinal plants was extracted in two different solvent systems, methanol (100%) and acetone-water (7 : 3), by using cold maceration and at reflux temperature. Total phenolic contents of the extracts were measured by F.C method [35]. The results revealed that the methanolic extract of four species (A. nilotica, A. lebbeck, C. fistula, and M. indica) contained the highest amount of phenolic contents at reflux temperature. For the remaining extracts, methanol extraction at room temperature was found a useful method. No encouraging results were obtained in the acetone-water extracts. The methanolic extracts of the selected medicinal plants showed significant variation in the total phenolic contents ranging from 528 to 715 mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE/g of crude extract). The bark extract of A. nilotica contained the highest amount of phenolic compounds (715 mg), while the extract of P. granatum, M. elengi, and M. indica showed 712, 706, and 700 mg of GAE/g of crude extract, respectively. 91.6% of the selected plant extracts contained more than 600 mg of GAE/g, while 4.2% showed a range of 528–597 mg of GAE/g of crude extract (Table 1). assay was carried out using in vitro model to assess the ability of the bark extracts to scavenge the free radical. This method was found rapid and reliable which can be applied to a large number of plant extracts [10, 11]. A total of 21 medicinal plant species from 11 families were collected, extracted, and tested. Their radical scavenging activity determined as % scavenging of , ranged from 87 to 96%. Of the 21 extracts of the medicinal plants, 15 species showed % scavenging activity from 90 to 96%, while remaining in the range of 87 to 90%. The highest activity (96%) was exhibited by the extracts of P. granatum (EC50 = 7 μg/mL) and M. indica (EC50 = 14 μg/mL). 95% scavenging of was obtained for A. nilotica (EC50 = 6 μg/mL), F. racemosa (EC50 = 11 μg/mL), and E. jambolana (EC50 = 12 μg/mL). The extracts of M. elengi showed the lowest EC50 (3 μg/mL) with 94% scavenging activity. Among the extracts which exhibited 92% radical scavenging activity, A. modesta was the most effective with EC50 = 8 μg/mL, while the extracts with 91% scavenging activity (M. champaca and P. guajava; EC50 = 13 μg/mL, 15 μg/mL, resp.) and with 90% (A. catechu, F. religiosa; EC50 = 8 μg/mL, 9 μg/mL, resp.) showed close results with respect to minimum concentration required to inhibit 50% of the initial concentration of . A large variation in the EC50 values of C. fistula (4 μg/mL) was observed with 88% scavenging activity as compared to two other species (E. Suberosa, EC50 = 28 μg/mL, and F. Infectoria, EC50 = 24 μg/mL) with same % radical scavenging activity. The extract of P. roxburghii with 87% scavenging of showed EC50 = 11 μg/mL, while P. longifolia exhibited the highest EC50 values = 65 μg/mL of the selected plants with same % scavenging activity (Figure 1).


Plant nameTP (mg GAE/g crude extract)DPPH scavenging (%)IC50 (μg/mL)Trypsin inhibition (%)Reported phenols

A.  catechu 608 ± 2090 ± 18 ± 143 ± 2Flavonol derivative
A.  lebbeck 625 ± 2692 ± 119 ± 225 ± 1
A.  modesta 661 ± 1592 ± 28 ± 137 ± 2
A.  nilotica 715 ± 1795 ± 26 ± 152 ± 3Epicatechin, flavonol, and catechin derivatives
C.  fistula 597 ± 1388 ± 14 ± 156 ± 3Catechin, flavonol derivative
C.  zeylanicum 627 ± 1092 ± 113 ± 332 ± 2Epicatechin derivative
E.  jambolana 692 ± 2495 ± 212 ± 246 ± 2Ellagic acid, kaempherol derivative
E.  suberosa 564 ± 1688 ± 128 ± 427 ± 1
F.  benghalensis 618 ± 2489 ± 116 ± 221 ± 1Leucopelargon derivative, leucocyanidin
F.  infectoria 576 ± 2188 ± 124 ± 328 ± 1
F.  racemosa 692 ± 2795 ± 211 ± 225 ± 2Racemosic acid, bergenin
F.  religiosa 635 ± 1590 ± 19 ± 232 ± 1
P.  guajava 656 ± 1091 ± 115 ± 230 ± 1Catechin derivative
P.  granatum 712 ± 996 ± 17 ± 127 ± 2Ellagic acid, isoflavone, and gallic acid derivative
P.  longifolia 528 ± 1687 ± 165 ± 522 ± 2
P.  roxburghii 570 ± 2287 ± 111 ± 239 ± 2Ferulic acid derivative
M.  champaca 650 ± 2591 ± 113 ± 333 ± 3
M.  elengi 706 ± 994 ± 13 ± 029 ± 2Myricetin-3-rhamnoside
M.  indica 700 ± 1396 ± 212 ± 136 ± 11,7-dihydroxy xanthone, gallic acid and chromone derivative
Z.  jujuba 670 ± 1794 ± 117 ± 244 ± 2Flavonol, quercetin and catechin derivative

Results are mean ± SD (); —: not found.

The correlation coefficients () of antioxidant activity with total phenolic contents of methanolic extract were found 0.8874 (room temperature) and 0.8327 (reflux temperature) and acetone-water 0.8433 (room temperature) and 0.7580 (reflux temperature).

The phenolic compounds in the methanolic extracts of E. jambolana, A. nilotica, and C. zeylanicum were identified and confirmed by high performance liquid chromatography with standard samples. The results of these plant extracts along standards are shown in Figures 25. Gallic acid was identified in the extract of C. zeylanicum and A. nilotica appearing at RT = 2.93 min; tannic acid at RT = 2.77 min (E. suberosa, A. catechu, P. longifolia, E. jambolana, Z. jujuba, F. infectoria, and A. nilotica); quercetin at RT = 13.7 min (C. zeylanicum); rutin at RT = 5.6 min (P. longifolia and E. jambolana); catechin at RT = 4.2 min (Z. jujuba, E. jambolana, and A. nilotica); hesperidin at RT = 5.3 min (A. nilotica, E. jambolana, and C. zeylanicum); cinnamic acid at RT = 15.6 min (C. zeylanicum).

Plant polyphenols probably constitute the largest group of plant-secondary metabolites, which have an important application as defense antioxidants. They include phenols, phenolic acids, flavonoids, tannins, and lignans. They possess an aromatic ring bearing one or more hydroxyl constituents including their functional derivatives [38, 39]. Antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds is correlated to their chemical structure. Flavonoids have the basic skeleton of diphenyl propane with different oxidations of central pyran ring. In plants, flavonoids are found as O-glycosides with sugar or through C-glycoside, but some are present as aglycones. In general O-glycosides at C-3 of ring “C” have lower radical scavenging power than those having a free –OH at C-3 because it is thought to be related to the reduction of the free radical [40].

Bark of the selected medicinal plants is associated with the cure of many ailments (Table 2). Quantitative data on the phenolic compounds in the bark extracts of the selected plants was not found in the literature but the main constituents are suggested to be phenolic acids such as gallic acid, ellagic acid, rosmerinic acid, tannic acid, fistulic acid, cinnamic acid, and ferulic acid in P. granatum, M. indica, F. racemosa, E. jambolana, C. fistula, and P. roxburghii [4143] (Table 2). Myricetin glycoside, 4-O-acetyl myricetin, eujambin, and eujambolin have been identified in E. jambolana [44, 45]. Myricitine was isolated from M. elengi and cinnamic acid derivative from Z. jujuba [46]. Epicatechin glycosides were reported from C. fistula [47], epicatechin derivatives, Psidinin A, B, and C, from P. guajava, xanthone and xanthene derivative from M. indica [48], and quercetin and kaemferol derivative from E. rostrata. Ellagic acid glycosides were identified in the bark extract of P. grantum [49]; gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, pyrocatechol, (+)-catechin, (−) epigallocatechin-7-gallate, and (−) epigallocatechin-5, 7-digallate were identified in the extract of A. nilotica [24].


FamilyPlant nameUsesReferences

FabaceaeAcacia  nilotica L.Gargle, diarrhea, antibacterial, antidiabetic, and antioxidant [5154]
Acacia  modesta Wall
Acacia  catechu L.Melancholia, conjunctivitis, haemoptysis, skin diseases, asthma sore mouth, chest pain, antioxidant, colicky pain, gravel, bronchitis, and liver diseases[54, 55]
Albizia  lebbeck L.Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, leprosy, brinchis, paralysis, and helminthiasis[54, 56]
Cassia  fistula LAstringent, purgative, anthelmintic, diuretic, laxative, expectorant, anti-inflammatory, cathartic, and antioxidant[57]
Erythrina  suberosa Roxb

MoraceaeFicus  bengalensis L. Hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipidaemia, antidiabetic, antidiarrhoeal, dysentery, diabetes and skin diseases, antioxidant and piles [54, 58]
Ficus  religiosa L. Inflammations, antimicrobial, swelling of neck, gonorrhea, scabies, strengthening gums, antimicrobial, astringent, sweet, cooling, aphrodisiac, antiseptic antioxidant, expectorant, and antiphlogistic[54, 58]
Ficus  racemosa RoxbAntioxidant, antimicrobial, wound healingdiabetic, and anthelmintic[54, 58]

Ficus  infectoria Roxb

MyrtaceaeEugenia  jambolana L.Acrid, sweet, digestive, astringent, anthelmintic, sore throat, bronchitis, asthma, thirst, biliousness, dysentery, ulcers, and antioxidant[45]
Psidium  guajava L. Astringent, febrifuge, antiseptic, antimicrobial, diarrhoea, stomach ache and diabetes, and antioxidant[59]
Eucalyptus  rostrata SchlechtAntimicrobial and gastroprotective dysentery, microbial infections, diarrhoea, helminthiasis, haemorrhage, respiratory pathologies, respiratory disease, astringent, anthelmintic, aphrodisiacs, laxative, diuretic, stomachic, cardio tonic, and antioxidant[57, 58, 60]

LauraceaeCinnamomum  zeylanicum Blume Flavoring agent, cardiac stimulant, tonic for stomach, intestine, antispasmodic, antidysenteric, aphrodisiacs semenogogues, and antioxidant[61]

MagnoliaceaeMichelia  champaca L.Hypoglycemic, stimulant, diuretic, febrifuge, purgative, immounogogue, and stimulant[58]

PinaceaePinus  roxburghii Sarg

RhamnaceaeZizyphus  jujube L.Antifertility, analgesic, antidiabetes, intestinal spasms, venereal diseases, and antioxidant[58]

AnacardiaceaeMangifera  indica L.Antihelminthic, antiallergic, acrid, refrigerant, styptic, antisyphilitic and anti-inflammatory and antioxidant[58, 59]

SapotaceaeMimusops  elengi L.Acrid, astringent, cooling, anthelmintic, gargle, odontopathy, ulemorrhagia, diarrhea, and dysentery[58]

AnnonaceaePolyalthia  longifolia SonnFebrifuge, skin diseases, diabetes, hypertension, and bleeding piles[58]

—: no reported activity.

Statistical results of the correlation studies (average .8874) between antiradical scavenging activity and total phenolic contents strongly suggested that the phenolic compounds were the dominant antioxidant in the methanolic extract of the bark of selected plants (Table 2). Our results are in agreement with the reported data [6, 50]. The analysis of phenolic compounds and their correlation with radical scavenging activity in “E. rostrata, M. champaca, A. modesta, P. roxburghii, P. longifolia, E. suberosa, M. elengi, and F. infectoria” have been reported for the first time. Figures 35 display the selected HPLC profile of the medicinal plants. However, main phenolic compounds in 13 medicinal plants could not be identified in this study (Table 3). Therefore, further chemical identification will be required to reveal the possible structure activity relationship.


Name of plantCompounds identified with HPLC

C.  zeylanicum Gallic acid
Cinnamic acid
Hesperidin
Quercetin

E.  jambolana Tannic acid
Rutin
Hesperidin
Catechin

A.  catechu Tannic acid

F.  infectoria Tannic acid

A.  nilotica Gallic acid
Catechin
Tannic acid

Z.  jujuba Catechin
Tannic acid

P.  longifolia Rutin
Tannic acid

E.  suberosa Tannic acid

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. E. B. Rimm, A. Ascherio, E. Giovannucci, D. Spiegelman, M. J. Stampfer, and W. C. Willett, “Vegetable, fruit, and cereal fiber intake and risk of coronary heart disease among men,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 275, no. 6, pp. 447–451, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. A. Steinmetz and J. D. Potter, “Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 1027–1039, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. N. Ito, M. Hirose, S. Fukushima, H. Tsuda, T. Shirai, and M. Tatematsu, “Studies on antioxidants: their carcinogenic and modifying effects on chemical carcinogenesis,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 24, no. 10-11, pp. 1071–1081, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. P. T. Gardner, T. A. C. White, D. B. McPhail, and G. G. Duthie, “The relative contributions of vitamin C, carotenoids and phenolics to the antioxidant potential of fruit juices,” Food Chemistry, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 471–474, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. A. Youdim, J. P. E. Spencer, H. Schroeter, and C. Rice-Evans, “Dietary flavonoids as potential neuroprotectants,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 383, no. 3-4, pp. 503–519, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. W. Zheng and S. Y. Wang, “Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 5165–5170, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. A. Anagnostopoulou, P. Kefalas, V. P. Papageorgiou, A. N. Assimopoulou, and D. Boskou, “Radical scavenging activity of various extracts and fractions of sweet orange peel (Citrus sinensis),” Food Chemistry, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. W. Heldt, Plant Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1997.
  9. C. A. Rice-Evans, N. J. Miller, P. G. Bolwell, P. M. Bramley, and J. B. Pridham, “The relative antioxidant activities of plant-derived polyphenolic flavonoids,” Free Radical Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 375–383, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. J. Miller, C. Rice-Evans, M. J. Davies, V. Gopinathan, and A. Milner, “A novel method for measuring antioxidant capacity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant status in premature neonates,” Clinical Science, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 407–412, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  11. W. Brand-Williams, M. E. Cuvelier, and C. Berset, “Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. V. Fogliano, V. Verde, G. Randazzo, and A. Ritieni, “Method for measuring antioxidant activity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant capacity of wines,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1035–1040, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. C. Porto, S. Calligaris, E. Celotti, and M. C. Nicoli, “Antiradical properties of commercial cognacs assessed by the DPPH(.) test,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 4241–4245, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. Sánchez-Moreno, L. Plaza, B. De Ancos, and M. P. Cano, “Quantitative bioactive compounds assessment and their relative contribution to the antioxidant capacity of commercial orange juices,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 430–439, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. P. Ambasta, The Useful Plants of India, Publication and Information Directorate, CSIR, New Delhi, India, 1994.
  16. K. Rajagopalan, V. V. Sivarajan, and P. R. Varier, Indian Medicinal Plants, vol. 1, Orient Longmans, Madras, India, 1993.
  17. R. M. Tripathi, P. C. Sen, and P. K. Das, “Studies on the mechanism of action of Albizzia lebbeck, an Indian indigenous drug used in the treatment of atopic allergy,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 385–396, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. D. Anish, A. Firoj, S. C. Bachar, J. Kundu, and D. Shrabanti, “Antiinflammatory effect of Albizzia lebbeck (Benth) Bark,” OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 685–687, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. S. Kasture, S. B. Kasture, and S. C. Pal, “Anticonvulsant activity of Albizzia lebbeck leaves,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 78–80, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  20. T. Bhakta, S. Banerjee, S. C. Mandal, T. K. Maity, B. P. Saha, and M. Pal, “Hepatoprotective activity of Cassia fistula leaf extract,” Phytomedicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 220–224, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Espósito Avella, A. Díaz, I. de Gracia, R. de Tello, and M. P. Gupta, “Evaluation of traditional medicine: effects of Cajanus cajan L. and of Cassia fistula L. on carbohydrate metabolism in mice,” Revista medica de Panama, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  22. I. H. Burkill, A Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peninsular, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2nd edition, 1966.
  23. B. N. Sastri, The Wealth of India, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India, 1952.
  24. K. R. Kartikar and B. D. Basu, Indian Medicinal Plants, vol. 2, Periodical Experts, New Delhi, India, 1975.
  25. A. Hansson, J. C. Zelada, and H. P. Noriega, “Reevaluation of risks with the use of Ficus insipida latex as a traditional anthelmintic remedy in the Amazon,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 251–257, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. X.-M. Zhu, J.-X. Song, Z.-Z. Huang, Y.-M. Wu, and M.-J. Yu, “Antiviral activity of mangiferin against herpes simplex virus type 2 in vitro,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 452–454, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  27. T. Clayton, P. Saralamp, W. Chuakul, and R. Temsiririkkul, Medicinal Plants in Siri Ruckhachati Garden, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, 1994.
  28. K. M. Nadkarni, Indian Materia Medica, vol. 1, Popular Praashan Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India, 1976.
  29. N. Jahan, W. Ahmed, and A. Malik, “New steroidal glycosides from Mimusops elengi,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1244–1247, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. O. Fatope, S. K. S. Al Burtomani, and Y. Takeda, “Monoacylglycerol from Punica granatum seed oil,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 357–360, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Aguilar, A. Argueta, and L. Cano, Flora Medicinal Indígena de México, vol. 2, Instituto Nacional Indigenista, México, Mexico, 1994.
  32. S. Faizi, N. R. Mughal, R. A. Khan et al., “Evaluation of antimicrobial property of Polyalthia longifolia var. pendula: isolation of a lactone as the active antibacterial agent from the ethanol extract of stem,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1177–1181, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. Nair and S. Chanda, “Evaluation of Polyalthia longifolia (Sonn.) Thw. leaf extract for antifungal activity,” Journal of Cell & Tissue Research, vol. 1, pp. 581–584, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  34. A. Erenmemisoglu, F. Kelestimur, A. N. Koker, H. Ustun, Y. Tekol, and M. Ustdal, “Hypoglycaemic effect of Zizyphus jujuba leaves,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 72–74, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. V. L. Singleton and J. A. Rossi, “olorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents,” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, vol. 16, pp. 144–158, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  36. R. R. T. Majinda, P. Erasto, and G. Bojase-Moleta, “Antimicrobial and antioxidant flavonoids from the root wood of Bolusanthus speciosus,” Phytochemistry, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 875–880, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Jedinák, T. Maliar, D. Grančai, and M. Nagy, “Inhibition activities of natural products on serine proteases,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 214–217, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. Shahidi and M. Naczk, Food Phenolics: Sources, Chemistry, Effects and Applications, Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, Pa, USA, 1995.
  39. D. Strack, “Phenolic metabolism,” in Plant Biochemistry, P. M. Dey and J. B. Harborne, Eds., Academic Press, London, UK, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  40. S. Burda and W. Oleszek, “Antioxidant and antiradical activities of flavonoids,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 2774–2779, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. D. M. Smith and J. B. Harborne, “Xanthones in the appalachian Asplenium complex,” Phytochemistry, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 2117–2119, 1971. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. B. Theeshan, S. N. Vidushi, and I. A. Okezie, “Phytochemical constituents of Cassia fistula,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 13, pp. 1530–1540, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  43. S. A. A. El-Toumy and H. W. Rauwald, “Two ellagitannins from Punica granatum heartwood,” Phytochemistry, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 971–974, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. N. A. M. Saleh, H. Fritsch, P. Witkop, and H. Grisebach, “UDP-Glucose: cyanidin 3-O-glucosyltransferase from cell cultures of Haplopappus gracilis,” Planta, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. H. Sagrawat, A. S. Mann, and M. D. Kharya, “Pharmacological potential of Eugenia jambolana: a review,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 2, pp. 96–105, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  46. N. Okamura, A. Yagi, and I. Nishioka, “Studies on the constituents of Zizyphi Fructus. V. structures of glycosides of benzyl alcohol, vomifoliol and naringenin,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 3507–3514, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Morimoto, G. Nonaka, and I. Nishioka, “Tannins and related compounds. LX: isolation and characterization of proanthocyanidins with a doubly-linked Unit from Vaccinium vitis-idaea L,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 36, pp. 33–38, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  48. T. Tanaka, N. Ishida, M. Ishimatsu, G. Nonaka, and I. Nishioka, “Tannins and related compounds. CXVI. Six new complex tannins, guajavins, psidinins and psiguavin from the bark of Psidium guajava L.,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2092–2098, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. A. A. El-Toumy and H. W. Rauwald, “Two ellagitannins from Punica granatum heartwood,” Phytochemistry, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 971–974, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Y. Cai, Q. Luo, M. Sun, and H. Corke, “Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer,” Life Sciences, vol. 74, no. 17, pp. 2157–2184, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. B. Mahesh and S. Satish, “Antimicrobial activity of some important medicinal plant against plant and human pathogens,” World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 839–843, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  52. A. Jabeen, M. A. Khan, M. Ahmad, M. Zafar, and F. Ahmad, “Indigenous uses of economically important flora of Margallah Hills National Park, Islamabad, Pakistan,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 763–784, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  53. A. Banso, “Phytochemical and antibacterial investigation of bark extracts of Acacia nilotica,” Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 82–85, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  54. V. K. Alluri, R. V. N. Tayi, S. Dodda, V. Mulabagal, T. Hsin-Sheng, and V. S. Gottumukkala, “Biological screening of medicinal plants collected from Eastern Ghats of India using Artemia salina,” International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Research, vol. 4, pp. 115–125, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  55. T. G. Nagaraja, S. V. Sarang, and D. C. Jambhale, “Evaluation of antimycotic activity of Acacia catechu Willd,” Journal of Biopesticides, vol. 1, pp. 197–198, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  56. K. Arvind, A. K. Saluja, U. D. Shah, and A. V. Mayavanshi, “Pharmacological potential of Albizzia lebbeck: a review,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 1, pp. 171–174, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  57. V. Duraipandiyan, M. Ayyanar, and S. Ignacimuthu, “Antimicrobial activity of some ethnomedicinal plants used by Paliyar tribe from Tamil Nadu, India,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 6, article no. 35, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. B. D. Selvam, “Inventory of vegetable crude drug samples housed in botanical survey of India, Howrah,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 61–94, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  59. D. A. Akinpelu and T. M. Onakoya, “Antimicrobial activities of medicinal plants used in folklore remedies in south-western,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1078–1081, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  60. B. A. Adeniyi, T. O. Lawal, and S. B. Olaleye, “Antimicrobial and gastroprotective activities of Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Myrtaceae) crude extracts,” Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1141–1145, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. H. Shah, A. H. Al-Shareef, A. M. Ageel, and S. Qureshi, “Toxicity studies in mice of common spices, Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark and Piper longum fruits,” Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 231–239, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Muhammad Asam Raza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1385
Downloads871
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.