Review Article
Analytical Strategies for the Determination of Arsenic in Rice
Table 3
Nonchromatographic methods for speciation of arsenic in rice.
| Arsenic species | Sample preparation | Detection | Figures of merit | Reference |
| As(III) and As(V) | Assisted digestion microwave with 0.14 mol/L HNO3 | HG-AAS | LOD: 1.96–3.85 ng/g | [65] | As(III) and As(V) | Vortex with 25 mL of solution 0.05 mol/L (NH4)2CO3 | HG-AFS | LOD: 1.3–4.4 ng/g Recovery: 94-95% | [55] | As(III) and As(V) | Cloud point extraction | UV-Vis | LOD: 1.14 g/L Enrichment factor: 65 Recovery: 95–102% | [66] | Total As and As(V) | Sonication with 0.5 mol/L HNO3 | ETAAS | LOD: 10–33 ng/L Enrichment factor: 78.3 Recovery: 90.8–113.1% | [51] | Inorganic As, MMA, DMA, and AsB | 0.01 mol/L TMAH (tetramethylammonium hydroxide) | ETAAS | LOD: 15–50 ng/g | [67] | Total As, As(III), and As(V) | Assisted digestion microwave with 1.0 mol/L HNO3 | ETAAS | LOD: 19–30 g/Kg LOQ: 57–90.3 g/Kg Recovery: 92–105% | [49] |
|
|
LOD: limit of detection; LOQ: limit of quantification.
|