Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Chemistry
Volume 2016, Article ID 1501728, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1501728
Research Article

Electrocatalytic Study of Carbon Dioxide Reduction By Co(TPP)Cl Complex

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia

Received 15 November 2015; Accepted 1 December 2015

Academic Editor: Liviu Mitu

Copyright © 2016 Khalaf Alenezi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is notorious for being a greenhouse gas and is the most important cause of global warming. However, it can be converted into useful products as it is a source of carbon. Reduction of CO2 is therefore an attractive research topic for many chemists. Different methods of electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 have been reported previously. Since CO2 is very stable, the direct electroreduction of CO2 into CO requires high potential at −2.2 V versus Ag/AgCl. In this work, CO2 reduction was carried out by the photoelectrocatalysis of CO2 in the presence of cobalt(III)tetraphenylporphyrin [Co(TPP)Cl] at −1.85 V with a current efficiency of 71%. At illuminated p-type silicon photocathode, the reduction of CO2 into CO was performed at a potential of 300 mV which is positive. However, at the same conditions, potential of −1.55 V with a current efficiency of ca 65% is required for the carbon electrode.

1. Introduction

The increasing amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) over the past years may affect the environment adversely due to the fact that it is a greenhouse gas and can lead to global warming. In the air, CO2 is a final product of combustion of carbon-containing compounds and represents fully oxidized carbon. It is thermodynamically very stable and it requires a lot of energy to break its C-O bonds. However, there are four different methods for CO2 splitting: enzymatic [1, 2], electrochemical (electrocatalytic) reduction [3, 4], photoreduction [5, 6], and abstraction of an oxygen atom from a CO2 molecule by coordination complexes [7]. The conversion of CO2 into valuable products is challenging as it requires a lot of energy [810]. Photosynthesis, photocatalytic, and electrochemical reduction of CO2 are the effective processes to use CO2 as a carbon source and convert it into useful products. Energy is required for all these processes, such as requirement of electricity in electrochemical reduction process [11]. CO2 has been converted into chemicals (such as formic acid) and fuels (such as methanol, methane, and carbon monoxide (CO)) previously [1214]. Photochemical conversion of CO2 to fuels or valuable chemicals using renewable solar energy can decrease the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere [15].

Recycling atmospheric CO2, by its capture and subsequent reduction to valuable products and liquid fuels, is an increasingly important research area. It is possible to drive the half-cell reaction (CO2 + 2H+ + + H2O) under visible light illumination at a p-type silicon (p-Si) photocathode using a catalyst [16, 17].

A light assisted generation of syngas (H2 : CO = 2 : 1) from CO2 and water can be achieved by using p-Si/catalyst. In the system, water is reduced heterogeneously on p-Si surface and CO2 is reduced homogeneously by the catalyst (Scheme 1) [17, 18].

Scheme 1

The field of electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 by metal complexes has been studied extensively by many researchers [1922]. Homogeneous transition-metal catalysts, such as Ru, Re, Co, and Ni complexes, have been used to reduce the CO2 molecule by a multielectron reduction process [2325]. CO2 reduction by tricarbonyl rhenium(I) complex was first reported by Hawecker and coworkers [26], and the mechanism of such reactions have been studied previously [2630]. The most efficient catalyst [Re(bpy)(CO)3]+ was used for the selective photoreduction of CO2 to CO in a homogeneous system [27]. The drawback of using rhenium complex as a catalyst is that it reacts with CO2 very slowly [2832]. Binuclear rhenium(I) complexes with saturated bridging ligands have been synthesized for the photocatalytic CO2 reduction [33]. Recently, the synthesis of dinuclear rhenium complexes of the 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine (tptz) ligand and catalytic activity of tptz, as a bis(bidentate) ligand or as a bi- and tridentate chelating ligand, has been reported [34].

The reduction of CO2 to CO using visible light can be used to cycle CO2 gas [8, 17, 3538]. Hawecker and coworkers used Re(I) pyridyl complex as a catalyst for CO2 reduction into CO [26]. In addition, the same reaction has been carried out by using sacrificial amine as an electron source [27, 30]. Re(4,4-But2bpy)(CO)3Cl has been used as a catalyst for the same purpose at p-type silicon photocathodes when illuminated with visible light giving a photo-voltage of ca 600 mV. Thus, it makes the reduction of CO2 possible at potentials of −1.2 V to −1.4 V versus saturated calomel electrode (SCE). A current efficiency of 97% was achieved under illumination. The duration of electrolysis was 3 h. However, attempts have been made to replace rhenium with more abundant metals for organometallic complexes due to the fact that rhenium is a rare metal found on earth [10, 39, 40].

Tetraphenylporphyrin iron chloride complex (Fe(TPP)Cl) was previously used for CO2 reduction to CO and was claimed to be an efficient electrocatalyst for CO2 reduction. 95% of current efficiency was reported and CO was reported to have high selectivity compared to H2 at a mercury pool cathode when 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (CF3CH2OH) was used as a proton source. Reduction of CO2 to CO was carried out in a visible light at illuminated p-type Si photocathode using Fe(TPP)Cl in the presence of CF3CH2OH as a proton source gave a current efficiency >90% and a high selectivity over H2 formation. The potential of ca −1.2 V versus SCE was required under illumination. In the dark, on vitreous carbon, a potential of −1.85 V versus SCE was required. Iron(0)pentaflourotetraphenylporphyrin (Fe(PFTPP)Cl) was reported to be more positive potential than Fe(TPP)Cl, because the strong electron withdrawing fluorogroups shifted the potential for electrocatalysis about 400 mV positive compared to that of Fe(TPP)Cl [41].

The economic and efficient conversion of overabundant CO2 into sources of fuel by means of renewable solar energy is one of the important objectives [4245]. This work presents the electrochemical catalysis of CO2 reduction into CO by cobalt(III)tetraphenylporphyrin [Co(TPP)Cl] at carbon and illuminated p-type Si electrodes.

2. Materials and Methods

Chemicals, solvents, Co(TPP)Cl, and CF3CH2OH were purchased from Aldrich and used as received. Methyl cyanide (CH3CN) was purified by distillation over calcium hydride. The single crystal B-doped p-type Si (1–10 cm−1, (111) face, thickness 500–550 μm) was supplied by Silicon Materials (Germany). The ohmic contacts were made using Ga-In eutectic and silver epoxy resin by the method of Tamaki et al. [43]. The photoelectrochemical cell was described earlier [45].

Cyclic voltammetric experiments were carried out using an Autolab PGSTAT 30 potentiostat. A conventional three-electrode arrangement was employed, consisting of a vitreous carbon working electrode, a platinum wire as the auxiliary electrode, and Ag+/AgCl as a reference electrode.

The electrolysis cells were degassed with argon gas to remove oxygen. The cell was filled with an electrolyte (a solvent containing 0.2 M [Bu4N][BF4]). The volume of electrolyte was 14 mL, out of which 5 mL occupied the working electrode compartment. About 9-10 mL gas phase took place at the working electrode part. 0.35 mM catalyst Co(TPP)Cl was added and dissolved in 5 mL dry CH3CN and stirred under Ar in electrochemical cell which was under Ar. Cyclic voltammetric measurements of Co(TPP)Cl were carried out under Ar; then, the solution was bubbled with CO2 (saturated with CO2). The cyclic voltammetry of Co(TPP)Cl was done under CO2 atmosphere to know the reduction catalytic CO2. CF3CH2OH was added to improve both efficiency and catalyst life time, without any significant formation of H2.

The electrolysis was carried out at the fitting potential and the current was recorded during the course of electrolysis verses the time. In addition, the charge passed was recorded. The electrolysis was stopped when the current decayed after 1.4 h.

3. Results and Discussion

The electrocatalytic behavior of Co(TPP)Cl was tested by cyclic voltammetry in the absence of CO2.

Figure 1 shows the typical cyclic voltammetry of Co(TPP)Cl at carbon electrode in the absence of CO2. The cyclic voltammetry of the complex exhibits two successive reduction waves. The first wave is reversible corresponding to Co(II)/Co(I) (one electron) at  V, and the second wave is irreversible corresponding to Co(I)/Co(0)2− (two electrons, one electron for second process of Co(TPP)Cl, versus V, and maybe the farther electron related to reduction of complex); potentials cited are versus Ag/AgCl.

Figure 1: Cyclic voltammetry of 0.20 mM Co(TPP)Cl in 0.1 M [Bu4N][BF4]-95% MeCN+ 5% DMF, scan rate 100 mVs−1 at vitreous carbon electrode under Ar.

Figure 2 shows the different scan rate in 0.1 M [Bu4N][BF4]-95% MeCN+ 5% DMF at vitreous carbon and Figure 3 shows the plots of versus of the first and second processes of Co(TPP)Cl, which are diffusion-controlled and involve an electrochemically reversible one-electron transfer. The plot of peak current versus is linear which means no complicated mass transfer control of one electron-transfer rate. The diffusion of first wave is calculated according to the following:

Figure 2: Cyclic voltammograms of 0.20 mM Co(TPP)Cl at carbon vitreous electrode, different scan rate in 0.1 M [Bu4N][BF4]-95% MeCN+ 5% DMF.
Figure 3: The plots of versus , Co(I)−1/Co(0)−2 reduction wave.
3.1. Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO2 by Co(TPP)Cl on Vitreous Carbon and p-Type Si Electrodes

Figure 4(a) shows the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 by Co(TPP)Cl on vitreous carbon, under argon. The current density of second reduction of Co(TPP)Cl is around 2.24 × 10−4 A·cm−2. In the same figure, the cyclic voltammetry of the catalyst shows that CO2 interacts with the reduced catalyst. The second wave process increased in height and became irreversible under CO2, and the catalytic current density increased to 1.76 × 10−3 A·cm−2.

Figure 4: Cyclic voltammetry of 0.20 mM Co(TPP)Cl in 0.1 M [Bu4N][BF4]-95% MeCN+ 5% DMF, scan rate 100 mVs−1 (a) at a vitreous carbon electrode and (b) at illuminated 1–10 ohm cm−1 p-type Si electrode.

As known, the direct reduction of CO2 at vitreous carbon electrode is around −2.2 V versus Ag/AgCl. In the presence of Co(TPP)Cl, the carbon CO2 shifted to −1.85 V which is more positive in comparison with the direct reduction. At p-type Si electrode, the second wave reduction of Co(TPP)Cl shifted to a more positive value ca 300 mV under illumination of light (Figure 4(b) in the absence and presence of CO2).

Figure 5 shows the comparison of cyclic voltammetry of Co(TPP)Cl at p-type Si electrode in dark and light which proves the shifting of potential in the presence of light around 300 mV.

Figure 5: Cyclic voltammetry of 0.20 mM Co(TPP)Cl in 0.1 M [Bu4N][BF4]-95% MeCN+ 5% DMF, scan rate 100 mVs−1 at p-type Si electrode in dark and at illuminated p-type Si electrode under Ar.
3.2. Preparative-Scale Electrolysis

Preparative bulk photoelectrosynthesis of CO on the p-type Si photocathode was performed in 1 M [Bu4N][BF4]-95% MeCN+ 5% DMF at room temperature in an H-type in the presence of 0.2 mM Co(TPP)Cl and 0.28 mM CF3CH2OH. The gas chromatography (GC-TCD) confirmed the formation of CO with a current efficiency of ca 65%. During the course of 1.4 h (−1.55 V versus Ag/AgCl), the charge passed was 4.18 C, the yield of CO was 14 μmoles, and ca 10% amount of hydrogen was produced as a by-product (Figure 6).

Figure 6: The current versus time: 0.2 mM Co(TPP)Cl in the presence of CO2 and 0.28 M CF3CH2OH in MeCN− 5% DMF containing 0.1 M [Bu4N][BF4], at p-type Si electrode.

In a separate experiment at the same conditions, the bulk electrolysis at carbon electrode was carried out at −1.85 V versus Ag/AgCl. CO2 was converted into CO with a current efficiency of ca 71.6%, where the yield of CO was 19 μmoles and the charge passed was 5.3 C. Also, a small amount of hydrogen was obtained which can be ignored. The current efficiency to produce CO at both carbon and p-type Si electrodes is smaller but the amount of hydrogen is different which may be because of coupling of homogeneous catalysts for the reduction of CO2 with heterogeneity of small amount of H2O. Reduction of CO2 by photocathode at p-type Si electrode is shown in Figure 7 and the course of electrolysis was 1.4 h.

Figure 7: The current versus time: 0.2 mM Co(TPP)Cl in the presence of CO2 and 0.28 M CF3CH2OH in MeCN− 5% DMF containing 0.1 M [Bu4N][BF4], at carbon electrode.

Table 1 summarises the results of both electrocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis of CO2 reduction by Co(TPP)Cl at carbon and p-type Si electrodes.

Table 1: Current efficiencies and turnover numbers of electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 catalyzed by Co(TPP)Cl at both carbon and p-type Si electrodes. T.N. = moles of product/moles of catalyst.

4. Conclusion

It has been shown that the CO2 reduction can be achieved by using a simple cobalt porphyrin complex as a catalyst in the electroreduction that is carried out in dark (carbon electrode) and under illumination (p-type Si electrode). At carbon electrode, cobalt porphyrin catalyzes conversion of CO2 to CO with the current efficiency of 72%. On the other hand, the current efficiency of CO2 to CO reduction was only 65% at p-type Si electrode in the presence of cobalt porphyrin. However, CF3CH2OH was added to improve the catalysis of CO2 reduction.

Under illumination at p-type Si electrode (boron-doped p-type H-terminated silicon), and in presence of cobalt porphyrin, the reduction of CO2 to CO can be achieved at a potential ca 300 mV positive to that of an inert vitreous carbon electrode. The reduction of CO2 to CO catalyzed by cobalt porphyrin was carried out at 1.85 V, but at p-type Si electrode it shifts more positive at −1.55 V versus Ag/AgCl.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Research Deanship, University of Hail, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, for providing research fund (SC14012). The author also thanks Dr. Saravanan Rajendrasozhan, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia, for his assistance in paper preparation.

References

  1. Ø. Hatlevik, M. C. Blanksma, V. Mathrubootham, A. M. Arif, and E. L. Hegg, “Modeling carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase (CODH/ACS): a trinuclear nickel complex employing deprotonated amides and bridging thiolates,” Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 238–246, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. C. Harrop and P. K. Mascharak, “Structural and spectroscopic models of the A-cluster of acetyl coenzyme a synthase/carbon monoxide dehydrogenase: nature's Monsanto acetic acid catalyst,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 249, no. 24, pp. 3007–3024, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. S. Silvia and C. C. Cummins, “Ligand-based reduction of CO2 to CO mediated by an anionic niobium nitride complex,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 2169–2171, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Z. Thammavongsy, T. Seda, L. N. Zakharov, W. Kaminsky, and J. D. Gilbertson, “Ligand-based reduction of CO2 and subsequent release of CO on iron(II),” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 17, pp. 9168–9170, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. Lin, H. Han, and H. Frei, “CO2 splitting by H2O to CO and O2 under UV light in TiMCM-41 silicate sieve,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 47, pp. 18269–18273, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Sato, K. Koike, H. Inoue, and O. Ishitani, “Highly efficient supramolecular photocatalysts for CO2 reduction using visible light,” Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 454–461, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Ohnishi, H. Seino, M. Hidai, and Y. Mizobe, “The C=O and C=S bond cleavage in carbon dioxide and tolyl isothiocyanate by reactions with the Mo(0) tetraphosphine complex [Mo{meso-o-C6H4(PPhCH2CH2PPh2)2}(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)],” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 690, no. 5, pp. 1140–1146, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. J. Morris, G. J. Meyer, and E. Fujita, “Molecular approaches to the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide for solar fuels,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1983–1994, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. E. Barton, D. M. Rampulla, and A. B. Bocarsly, “Selective solar-driven reduction of CO2 to methanol using a catalyzed p-GaP based photoelectrochemical cell,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 20, pp. 6342–6344, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Kumar, J. M. Smieja, and C. P. Kubiak, “Photoreduction of CO2 on p-type silicon using Re(bipy-But)(CO)3Cl: Photovoltages exceeding 600 mV for the selective reduction of CO2 to CO,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 33, pp. 14220–14223, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Jitaru, D. A. Lowy, M. Toma, B. C. Toma, and L. Oniciu, “Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on flat metallic cathodes,” Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 875–889, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. A. Olah, A. Goeppert, and G. K. S. Prakash, “Chemical recycling of carbon dioxide to methanol and dimethyl ether: from greenhouse gas to renewable, environmentally carbon neutral fuels and synthetic hydrocarbons,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 487–498, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Kumar, M. Llorente, J. Froehlich, T. Dang, A. Sathrum, and C. P. Kubiak, “Photochemical and photoelectrochemical reduction of CO2,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, vol. 63, pp. 541–569, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y.-Y. Ohnishi, Y. Nakao, H. Sato, and S. Sakaki, “Ruthenium(II)-catalyzed hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to formic acid. Theoretical study of significant acceleration by water molecules,” Organometallics, vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 3352–3363, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Kurz, B. Probst, B. Spingler, and R. Alberto, “Ligand variations in [ReX(diimine)(CO)3] complexes: effects on photocatalytic CO2 reduction,” European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 2006, no. 15, pp. 2966–2974, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. J. Fisher and R. Eisenberg, “Electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide by using macrocycles of nickel and cobalt,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 102, no. 24, pp. 7361–7363, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. E. Benson, C. P. Kubiak, A. J. Sathrum, and J. M. Smieja, “Electrocatalytic and homogeneous approaches to conversion of CO2 to liquid fuels,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 89–99, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Alenezi, “Solar light-driven reduction of CO2 on p-type silicon semiconducting electrodes by iron(0)pentaflourotetraphenylporphyrin,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 4279–4289, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Gattrell, N. Gupta, and A. Co, “A review of the aqueous electrochemical reduction of CO2 to hydrocarbons at copper,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 594, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Hara and T. Sakata, “Large current density CO2 reduction under high pressure using gas diffusion electrodes,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 571–576, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Hori, H. Ito, K. Okano, K. Nagasu, and S. Sato, “Silver-coated ion exchange membrane electrode applied to electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 48, no. 18, pp. 2651–2657, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Hara and T. Sakata, “Electrocatalytic formation of CH4 from CO2 on a Pt gas-diffusion electrode,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 539–545, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. H. Crabtree, Ed., Inorganic Chemical Strategies for a Warming World, JohnWiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
  24. T. R. O'Toole, L. D. Margerum, T. D. Westmoreland, W. J. Vining, R. W. Murray, and T. J. Meyer, “Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 at a chemically modified electrode,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, no. 20, pp. 1416–1417, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Portenkirchner, K. Oppelt, C. Ulbricht et al., “Electrocatalytic and photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide using the alkynyl-substituted rhenium(I) complex (5,5′-bisphenylethynyl-2,2′-bipyridyl)Re(CO)3Cl,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 716, pp. 19–25, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. Hawecker, J. M. Lehn, and R. Ziessel, “Efficient photochemical reduction of CO2 to CO by visible light irradiation of systems containing Re(bipy)(CO)3X or Ru(bipy)32+-Co2+ combinations as homogeneous catalysts,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, no. 9, pp. 536–538, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  27. H. Hori, F. P. A. Johnson, K. Koike, O. Ishitani, and T. Ibusuki, “Efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction using [RebpyCO3POET3]+,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, vol. 96, no. 1–3, pp. 171–174, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. T. Morimoto, T. Nakajima, S. Sawa, R. Nakanishi, D. Imori, and O. Ishitani, “CO2 capture by a rhenium(I) complex with the aid of triethanolamine,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 135, no. 45, pp. 16825–16828, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Hori, F. P. A. Johnson, K. Koike, K. Takeuchi, T. Ibusuki, and O. Ishitani, “Photochemistry of [Re(bipy)(CO)3(PPh3)]+ (bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine) in the presence of triethanolamine associated with photoreductive fixation of carbon dioxide: participation of a chain reaction mechanism,” Journal of the Chemical Society—Dalton Transactions, no. 6, pp. 1019–1023, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. H. Takeda, K. Koike, H. Inoue, and O. Ishitani, “Development of an efficient photocatalytic system for CO2 reduction using rhenium(I) complexes based on mechanistic studies,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 2023–2031, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. D. Doherty, D. C. Grills, J. T. Muckerman, D. E. Polyansky, and E. Fujita, “Toward more efficient photochemical CO2 reduction: use of scCO2 or photogenerated hydrides,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 254, no. 21-22, pp. 2472–2482, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. V. Balzani, Ed., Supramolecular Photochemistry, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1987.
  33. C. Bruckmeier, M. W. Lehenmeier, R. Reithmeier, B. Rieger, J. Herranz, and C. Kavakli, “Binuclear rhenium(I) complexes for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, vol. 41, no. 16, pp. 5026–5037, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. M. Berger and D. D. Ellis II, “Unusual electrochemical and spectroscopic behavior in a ligand-bridged binuclear complex of ruthenium (II): tetrakis (2,2′-bipyridine)- (μ-2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)triazine)diruthenium(II),” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 241, no. 2, pp. 1–4, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. R. Dubois and D. L. Dubois, “Development of molecular electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction and H2 production/oxidation,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1974–1982, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. D. Windle and R. N. Perutz, “Advances in molecular photocatalytic and electrocatalytic CO2 reduction,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 256, no. 21-22, pp. 2562–2570, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Schneider, H. Jia, J. T. Muckerman, and E. Fujita, “Thermodynamics and kinetics of CO2, CO, and H+ binding to the metal centre of CO2 reduction catalysts,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2036–2051, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. Yui, Y. Tamaki, K. Sekizawa, and O. Ishitani, “Photocatalytic reduction of CO2: from molecules to semiconductors,” Topics in Current Chemistry, vol. 303, pp. 151–184, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Kutal, M. A. Weber, G. Ferraudi, and D. Geiger, “A mechanistic investigation of the photoinduced reduction of carbon dioxide mediated by tricarbonylbromo(2,2'-bipyridine)rhenium(I),” Organometallics, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 2161–2166, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. Kumar, J. M. Smieja, A. F. Sasayama, and C. P. Kubiak, “Tunable, light-assisted co-generation of CO and H2 from CO2 and H2O by Re(bipy-tbu)(CO)3Cl and p-Si in non-aqueous medium,” Chemical Communications, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 272–274, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. Alenezi, S. K. Ibrahim, P. Li, and C. J. Pickett, “Solar fuels: photoelectrosynthesis of CO from CO2 at p-type Si using fe porphyrin electrocatalysts,” Chemistry—A European Journal, vol. 19, no. 40, pp. 13522–13527, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. I. Bhugun, D. Lexa, and J.-M. Savéant, “Catalysis of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide by iron(0) porphyrins: synergystic effect of weak Brönsted acids,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 1769–1776, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Y. Tamaki, K. Watanabe, K. Koike, H. Inoue, T. Morimoto, and O. Ishitani, “Development of highly efficient supramolecular CO2 reduction photocatalysts with high turnover frequency and durability,” Faraday Discussions, vol. 155, pp. 115–127, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. J. Bard and L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2001.
  45. L. R. Webster, S. K. Ibrahim, J. A. Wright, and C. J. Pickett, “Solar fuels: visible-light-driven generation of dihydrogen at p-type silicon electrocatalysed by molybdenum hydrides,” Chemistry—A European Journal, vol. 18, no. 37, pp. 11798–11803, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus