A Square Wave Voltammetry Study on the Antioxidant Interaction and Effect of Extraction Method for Binary Fruit Mixture Extracts

Table 3

Mixture index (MI) and regeneration percentage of DPPH and FRAP assays from fruit mixtures.

Assay	FME	Extraction method	MI	Interaction	X (%)
DPPH	L-G	CE	0.47 (0.06)^a	An	3.10 (0.14)^a
		UAE	0.42 (0.03)^a	An	4.58 (0.61)^b
		HHPE	0.40 (0.01)^a	An	4.20 (0.37)^ab
	L-B	CE	0.30 (0.01)^a	An	1.92 (0.16)^a
		UAE	0.33 (0.00)^b	An	1.95 (0.14)^a
		HHPE	0.32 (0.00)^ab	An	2.02 (0.01)^a
	G-B	CE	0.49 (0.04)^a	An	5.20 (0.01)^a
		UAE	0.35 (0.01)^b	An	3.11 (0.12)^b
		HHPE	0.34 (0.00)^b	An	3.50 (0.12)^c
FRAP	L-G	CE	0.57 (0.04)^a	An	13.28 (1.06)^a
		UAE	0.57 (0.04)^a	An	10.64 (0.77)^a
		HHPE	0.55 (0.02)^a	An	13.68 (1.16)^a
	L-B	CE	0.59 (0.01)^a	An	4.28 (0.42)^a
		UAE	0.53 (0.00)^b	An	3.03 (0.32)^b
		HHPE	0.53 (0.01)^b	An	3.22 (0.32)^ab
	G-B	CE	0.59 (0.01)^a	An	7.53 (0.90)^a
		UAE	0.57 (0.02)^a	An	4.15 (0.36)^b
		HHPE	0.58 (0.03)^a	An	4.15 (0.39)^b

Sy, synergistic interaction; Ad, additive interaction; An, antagonistic interaction. Mean values of each FME by CE, UAE, and HHPE with different superscript letters (a-b) in rows were significantly different () by Fisher’s test.