A Square Wave Voltammetry Study on the Antioxidant Interaction and Effect of Extraction Method for Binary Fruit Mixture Extracts
Table 5
Mixture index (MI) and regeneration percentage of TPC and TFC assays from fruit mixtures.
Assay
FME
Extraction method
MI
Interaction
X (%)
TPC
L-G
CE
0.24 (0.00)a
An
6.82 (0.36)a
UAE
0.31 (0.01)b
An
5.81 (0.74)a
HHPE
0.28 (0.01)b
An
6.27 (0.44)a
L-B
CE
0.29 (0.02)a
An
5.18 (0.55)a
UAE
0.30 (0.01)a
An
4.25 (0.38)a
HHPE
0.27 (0.00)a
An
4.33 (0.46)a
G-B
CE
0.28 (0.01)a
An
15.20 (0.05)a
UAE
0.29 (0.02)a
An
18.19 (0.99)b
HHPE
0.26 (0.01)a
An
14.03 (0.35)a
TFC
L-G
CE
0.30 (0.02)a
An
5.75 (0.68)a
UAE
0.30 (0.02)a
An
6.65 (0.18)a
HHPE
0.31 (0.00)a
An
6.91 (0.51)a
L-B
CE
0.35 (0.03)a
An
4.74 (0.59)a
UAE
0.34 (0.01)a
An
5.53(0.24)a
HHPE
0.33 (0.01)a
An
5.57 (0.53)a
G-B
CE
0.28 (0.00)a
An
4.39 (0.17)a
UAE
0.28 (0.00)a
An
4.42 (0.22)a
HHPE
0.29 (0.01)b
An
4.97 (0.37)a
Sy, synergistic interaction; Ad, additive interaction; An, antagonistic interaction. Mean values of each FME by CE, UAE, and HHPE with different superscript letters (a-b) in rows were significantly different () by Fisher’s test.