Research Article

Synthesis and Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Molecular Docking Analysis of Some Novel Quinoline Derivatives

Table 1

The inhibition zone of the synthetic compound in mm (mean ± SD).

Bacterial strainsConc. (μg/mL)Compounds
456781114151617Ciprofloxacin

E. coli3006.33 ± 0.44NANANA9.00 ± 0.557.33 ± 0.66NANA8.00 ± 0.67NA19.0 ± 0.67
5006.67 ± 0.89NANANA11.33 ± 1.1111.0 ± 1.33NANA9.33 ± 0.89NA21.0 ± 0.55
B. subtilis3007.0 ± 0.67NA7.0 ± 0.677.00 ± 0.676.67 ± 0.89NA6.67 ± 0.44NA6.33 ± 0.446.33 ± 0.4430.0 ± 0.67
5007.67 ± 0.44NA7.67 ± 0.447.33 ± 0.447.00 ± 0.67NA7.33 ± 0.44NA7.33 ± 0.447.33 ± 0.4433.0 ± 0.67
S. aureus3006.33 ± 0.446.00 ±0.00NANA6.00 ± 0.00NANA6.00 ± 0.44NANA9.0 ± 0.67
5007.0 ± 0.676.33 ± 0.446.00 ± 0.00NA6.33 ± 0.44NANA6.67 ± 0.44NANA11.0 ± 0.67
P. aeruginosa3007.0 ± 0.677.67 ± 0.448.0 ± 0.676.33 ± 0.447.00 ± 0.006.00 ±0.006.33 ± 0.448.33 ± 0.44NANA7.00 ± 0.00
5009.0 ± 0.679.33 ± 0.449.67 ± 1.116.33 ± 0.448.00 ± 0.676.33 ± 0.447.33 ± 0.4410.00.44NANA8.33 ± 0.44

NA: no inhibition zone; results are expressed as M±SD of triplicates.