Journal of Chemistry / 2020 / Article / Tab 8 / Research Article
Adsorption, Modeling, Thermodynamic, and Kinetic Studies of Methyl Red Removal from Textile-Polluted Water Using Natural and Purified Organic Matter Rich Clays as Low-Cost Adsorbent Table 8 Yields of methyl red removed using different methods, processes, and materials.
Methods Materials (adsorbents) Removal yields (%) References Chemical components Sterchamol 0.022 [20 ] SiO2-coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles 4.95 [21 ] Iron oxide modified MIL-100 (Fe) 62.5 [74 ] Biodegradation (or biodecolorization) Staphylococcus arlettae PF4 isolated from garden soil2.5 [18 ] Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 976399.1 [19 ] Consortium of bacteria (mixture of bacteria): Three bacteria (Sphingomonas paucimobilis , Bacillus sp., and Staphylococcus epidermidis ) 98.0 [11 ] Hazardous materials (biocomponents) Banana pseudostem fibers 8.85 [75 ] Sugarcane bagasse, pretreated with phosphoric acid (SBC) 1.10 [76 ] Untreated sugarcane bagasse (SB) 0.57 [76 ] NBP: neem tree bark powder/MBP: mango tree bark powder/LBP : locust bean tree bark powder MBP: 12% NBP: 8.5% LBP: 8% [77 ] Nano-sized calcium hydroxide catalyst prepared from clam shells 0.2 [78 ] Guar Gum powder 5.76 [47 ] Activated carbon Commercially available powdered activated carbon (PAC) 4.84 [76 ] Annona squamosa seeds activated carbon4.05 [79 ] Oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes 10.87 [22 ] Mesoporous-activated carbon from durian seed 38.47 [80 ] Zeolite commercial Modified zeolite commercial activated charcoal 3.0 [81 ] Modified zeolite commercial activated charcoal 0.7 [81 ]