Research Article
Carbonized Aramid Fiber as the Adsorbent for In-Tube Solid-Phase Microextraction to Detect Estrogens in Water Samples
Table 3
Comparison with other reported methods for the determination of estrogens.
| Analysis methods | Extraction materials | LOD (μg/L) | EFs | Extraction time (min) | Recoveries (%) | Ref. |
| IT-SPME-HPLC-VWD | Carbonized aramid fibers | 0.011–0.130 | 178–1335 | 32 | 74.3–121.1 | This work | HF-PIL-capsules-SPME | Hollow fiber membrane-coated PIL | 1.000–2.000 | 5–200 | 40 | — | [34] | SPME-HPLC-UV | Molecularly imprinted polymer | 2.210–2.390 | — | 38 | 80.0–94.0 | [35] | AIED/SCSE-HPLC/DAD | Polymer ionic liquid | 0.025–0.057 | 71–97 | 150 | 82.9–99.4 | [36] | CPE-HPLC/DAD | Tergitol TMN-6 | 0.100–0.200 | 66.51–94.34 | 60 | 85.9–104.0 | [37] | HPLC-FLD-UV | NH2-MIL-53 (Al)-polymer monolith | 0.002–0.040 | 289–293 | — | 75.1–102.0 | [38] | SPE-HPLC-DAD | Molecularly imprinted polymers | 8.71–9.54 | — | — | 69.0–82.2 | [39] |
|
|