Research Article
An Investigation for Heavy Metals’ Contamination in Farmers’ Fingernails: Case Study in Libya
Table 5
Concentration levels of heavy metals in fingernails samples of the participating farmers and the control group.
| Heavy metal | Subjects | Number of participants (N) | Level of heavy metals (µgg−1) | Significance tests at | Mean ± SD | Range | F-test | t-test | -value | Calculated value | Critical value1 | Calculated value | Critical value2 |
| As | Farmers | 127 | 3.016 ± 1.857 | 0.083–8.223 | 35.752 | 0.038 | 15.983 | 2.609 | | Control group | 25 | 0.354 ± 0.116 | ND–0.429 |
| Cd | Farmers | 127 | 9.059 ± 4.026 | 0.122–18.003 | 43.607 | 0.038 | 17.613 | 2.609 | | Control group | 25 | 1.912 ± 0.963 | 0.222–3.388 |
| Pb | Farmers | 127 | 11.322 ± 3.785 | 0.319–21.111 | 46.548 | 0.038 | 8.230 | 2.609 | | Control group | 25 | 4.747 ± 2.847 | 0.453–8.399 |
|
|
ND: not detected (lower than the LOD of 0.0077 µgg−1 for As).
|