The Combined Application of Surface Floating Wetlands and Bottom Anaerobic to Remediate AMD-Contaminated Lakes

Fu, Tianling; Wu, Yonggui; Wang, Hu; Chen, Kaiju; Zeng, Yan; Wen, Zhongzheng; Ran, Zhengyan; He, Li

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5867768

Journal of Chemistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Analysis and Remediation of Pollutants in Water and Soil

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5867768 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5867768

The Combined Application of Surface Floating Wetlands and Bottom Anaerobic to Remediate AMD-Contaminated Lakes

Tianling Fu,¹Yonggui Wu,¹Hu Wang,²Kaiju Chen,¹Yan Zeng,¹Zhongzheng Wen,¹Zhengyan Ran,¹and Li He¹

Academic Editor: Jun Wu

Received12 Apr 2022

Accepted09 Jun 2022

Published27 Jun 2022

Abstract

Acid mine drainage (AMD) causes environmental pollution that affects many countries with historic or current mining industries. The eco-remediation system (RW) which combined surface floating wetlands and bottom anaerobic sediments (SFW-BAS) was selected for AMD-contaminated lakes (AMDW). Meanwhile, AMDW and nature aquatic ecosystems (NW) were set as the control groups, respectively. The parameters, including pH, Eh, Fe, Mn, SO₄²⁻, and the degradation rate of the native dominant plant litter were investigated to assess the effects of remediation. The results showed that the average of pH, Eh, and EC, was 2.73, 484.08 mv, and 2395.33 μs·cm⁻¹, respectively. The average content of SO₄²⁻, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, and Pb was 2190 mg·L⁻¹, 40.2 mg·L⁻¹, 4.6 mg·L⁻¹, 249.2 μg·L⁻¹, 1563 μg·L⁻¹, and 112.9 μg·L⁻¹, respectively. The degradation rate of plant litters in AMDW ranged from 14.5% to 22.6%. However, RW ultimately improved the water quality and the degradation of litters. RW has a good effect on buffering the acidity, ranging from 3.96 to 7.41. The pH of RW (6.14) is close to that of NW (7.41). The average content of SO₄²⁻, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, and Pb was 2071 mg·L⁻¹, 3.4 mg·L⁻¹, 2.4 mg·L⁻¹, 85.3 μg·L⁻¹, 607.4 μg·L⁻¹, and 47.8 μg·L⁻¹, respectively, which showed good pollutant removal performance. The degradation rate of plant litters in RW ranged from 27.8% to 32.6%. Therefore, RW can be used to remediate AMDW.

1. Introduction

Upon exposure to water and oxygen and as a result of the activities of indigenous microbial populations, iron pyrite (FeS₂) and other sulphide minerals can be oxidized to form acidic and sulphate-rich drainage, which is a consequence of the mining and processing of metal ores and coals [1–3]. The oxidation of pyritic mining waste is a self-perpetuating corrosive process that has generated acid mine drainage (AMD) effluent for centuries or longer [4]. AMD is characterized by a low pH and high levels of sulphate and toxic metallic ions [2]. It is an important environmental issue since it can degrade the waterways in and around mine districts [5]. Both the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and processes may be disturbed [6, 7]. In aquatic ecosystems, it can be observed as a severe disturbance or even destruction of the water quality and the functions, habitats, biological communities, and species composition of these ecosystems. Studies have shown that AMD could significantly decrease the water quality [8, 9] and the activity of the invertebrates, aquatic plants, or zoobenthos [10]. Additionally, it may also affect the degradation of plant litter in the streams [11].

Therefore, there have been numerous studies devoted to reducing AMD formation or to treating these waste waters [6, 12]. However, few studies are designed to evaluate the techniques for ecological restoration of AMD-contaminated land or water. The optimized strategies are aimed to suppress the formation of AMD by treating the acid-producing rock directly and stopping/retarding the production of acidity at the source. These techniques include the use of alkaline amendments (e.g., limestone, hydrated lime, fly ash, and waste phosphate rock) [13, 14], covering the tailings with a layer of sediment or organic material (e.g., sewage sludge, manure mixture, and olive pomace) [15], coating technologies (e.g., solid-phase phosphates, phospholipids, and lipids) [16], the use of bactericides (e.g., sodium dodecyl sulphate, benzoic acid, and sodium benzoate), or the use of natural organic acids (e.g., fulvic acids, tannic acids, oxalic acid, and humic acids) [17]. Since large quantities of AMD are produced in the wider environment, the traditional methods could not meet the requirements. The current abiotic and bioremediative strategies for the remediation of AMD have been considered “active” and “passive” processes. The active treatment process involves abiotic remediation strategies (the addition of a chemical-neutralizing agent, e.g., limestone, hydrated lime, pebble quicklime, soda ash, or caustic soda) [14] and biological systems, such as sulphidogenic bioreactors [18]. In the passive treatment process, the abiotic technologies are mainly anoxic limestone drains (ALD) [19], but the biological remediation strategies have wider choices, such as wetlands [20] or compost bioreactors [18], the reducing and alkalinity-producing system (RAPS) [21], successive alkalinity-producing systems (SAPS), permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) [22], and iron-oxidizing bioreactors. Nevertheless, these strategies are purposed to suppress the formation of the AMD or to treat the production before it enters the environment. It will not work on already polluted water but on the wider environment, where the natural ecological system has been destroyed by the AMD. Surface floating wetlands are easy and cheap to construct and therefore used to treat mine tailings water and polluted rivers [23]. Surface floating wetlands are based on the self-cleaning capability of plants to augment aquatic projects and rapidly remove pollutants from water bodies [23]. Furthermore, there was the potential of activated sludge for the remediation of sulphur-rich wastewaters, owing to its simplicity and low cost [24]. Activated sludge could form suitable microbial community for AMD treatment [24]. If SFW-BAS could be constructed, the removal effects of contaminants from AMDW will increase with easy and low cost.

In this study, there are characterized by an inherently fragile ecosystem and sensitive processes of biogeochemical cycling in the karst regions in southwest China. RW was constructed to remediate AMDW, and RW included floating aerobic wetlands on the surface and anaerobic sediments in the bottom. AMDW and NW were set as the control groups, respectively. The water quality (pH, Eh, EC, Fe, Mn, and SO₄^2-) and litter decomposition rate of NW, AMDW, and RW were evaluated to compare to the remediation effect for the contaminated waters. These findings would provide the basic data of AMDW treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Regions

The study was carried out at the Guizhou province, located in the central karst region of Southwest China, which has a well-developed karst landform [25]. It has a moderate, subtropical, humid monsoon climate, which is characterized by hot and wet summers and mild and humid winters. Karst ecosystems are rich in water and mineral resources and can provide unique habitats for numerous fish and wildlife. Unfortunately, they are inherently fragile, at risk of degradation and vulnerable to the environmental change (e.g., human habitation, mining, and draining the sewage) [26]. Coal resources are extremely abundant in the Guizhou Province, but the sulphur contents in the coal are relatively high, with an average of 2.34% [27]. Because of the long time and large-scale mining activities of the coal and metal mines, large volumes of sulphide waste rock or tailings were discarded in this region. The main iron sulphide minerals are pyrite and marcasite (FeS₂), but others, such as chalcopyrite (CuFeS₂), covellite (CuS), galena (PbS), and sphalerite (ZnS), also exist [3, 28].

2.2. Simulated Experiments

The simulation of the microcosm aquatic ecosystems was carried out with six cylindrical tanks, each with a height of 900 mm and an internal diameter of 950 mm. A 15–20 cm layer of sediment from the Huaxi Reservoir and a 60 cm layer of lake water were placed in these tanks. The Huaxi Reservoir is a typical karst lake. The submerged vegetation, including Vallisneria natans Hara, Hydrilla verticillata, Ceratophyllum demersum L, pondweed, and Ottelia acuminate, was planted in these tanks. These microcosms were incubated in the open air, receiving natural lighting and temperature throughout the year. The cultivation lasted approximately three months, until these microcosms could be self-sustaining, and they were set as the simulation of the natural aquatic ecosystem (NW). Then, four microcosms were treated with the AMD on a regular basis, which were set as the simulation of the AMD-contaminated aquatic ecosystem (AMDW). Approximately two months later, two of the AMDW microcosms were equipped with an SFW-BAS treatment system, which was set as the eco-remediation aquatic ecosystem (RW). The surface floating wetlands consist of plastic foam or an empty bottle made of lightweight material that floats, has basins with holes in the bottom to be beneficial to the roots and for the water to penetrate, has soil or another suitable medium to support the vegetation, and contains vegetation that is a mix of cattail, stick tight, Lolium perenne, Alternanthera philoxeroides, and another native species. The bottom anaerobic sediments were formed by the original addition of the activated sludge and by constantly obtaining organic substances from the surface floating wetlands. The layout of the system is shown in Figure 1.

RW was successfully built for the remediation of AMDW (Figure 2). RW was in normal operation for 210 d. Plants grew well in the floating aerobic wetlands. There were fluffy anaerobic sediments at the bottom. RW could promote vertical interactions between the aerobic vegetation and anaerobic microorganisms to remediate AMDW.

2.3. Sampling and Analytical Methods

The litter of the native dominant woody species at the local shore, such as Salix babylonica and Broussonetia papyrifera, and submerged plants, such as Vallisneria natans Hara, Hydrilla verticillata, and Ceratophyllum demersum L, was collected in this study. The above selected litters were thoroughly cleaned by water and air-dried prior to the reuse or storage. Five grams of air-dried leaves were packed into 15 ∗ 30 cm nylon mesh bags with a mesh size of 2 ∗ 2 mm. The bags were placed at the bottom of the microcosm and on the surface of the sediments in quintuplicate at the three habitats representing NW, AMDW, and RW. The bags were retrieved 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 210 d after they were mounted. The decomposition rate was determined by direct measurements of the weight losses from the litter bags [29]. The mass losses were determined in oven-dried values (48 h, 60°C or until constant weight) after a strict cleaning.

Synchronously, water samples were collected at a depth of 0.2 m. The pH, electrical conductivity (EC), redox potential (Eh), and dissolved oxygen (DO) were determined in the water of the microcosm systems. The pH and EC were detected by a portable pH/EC/TDS instrument (HI 98129, HANNA, Germany). The Eh and DO were recorded by a potentiometer and DO6 probes, respectively. The water samples for the metal analysis were filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filters, acidified with nitric acid to pH <1, and analysed by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (WFX100 Beijing Ruili, China). The SO₄²⁻ concentrations were determined by the conventional ignition method in gravimetry.

2.4. Data Analysis

All data were analysed with SPSS 13.0. The differences in each evaluation index at different times were compared with a single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA), and those in different microcosms were compared with two-factor ANOVA. Moreover, Duncan’s multiple range was used to treat the average significant difference among the multiple comparisons.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Remediation on pH, EC, Eh, and DO

The water in the microcosm NW was crystal clear, the submerged plants (Vallisneria natans Hara, Ceratophyllum demersum L, Hydrilla verticillata, Potamogeton distinctus, and Ottelia acuminata) were growing well, and fish and shrimps were shuttling back and forth in the microcosms. The pH ranged from 6.45 to 8.06 (with a mean of 7.46), and the DO varied from 5.4 to 8.1 mg·L⁻¹ (with a mean of 7.26 mg·L⁻¹) (Figures 3(a) and 3(d)). The ECs were relatively low, with a range of 310 to 810 μs·cm⁻¹ (Figure 3(b)), and the Eh varied from 150 to −100 mV during the experiment time (Figure 3(c)). These indexes agreed well with those of the natural waters. The Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, and SO₄²⁻ concentrations remained at a very low level during the period of observation (Figure 4), which can meet class III of the environmental quality standards for surface water (GB3838-2002, China).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

In the microcosms AMDW, the water colour changed to dark red, and the bottoms and walls became coated with a layer of ochre particles. All the submerged vegetation, filamentous algae, fish, and shrimps disappeared. The average of the pH was 2.73, with the lowest value being 1.38 (Figure 3(a)), and the water presented an obvious acidification with a high salinity (1200–3750 μs·cm⁻¹; Figure 3(b)) and Eh (420–690 mv; Figure 3(c)). Simultaneously, the concentrations of the contaminated ions and sulphate in the AMDW were continuously increasing, with values dozens or hundreds of times higher than those in NW (Figure 4), which presented a typical AMD contamination [3].

Compared to the microcosm AMDW, RW had good performance in raising the pH to neutral (Figure 3(a)), buffering the strong oxidizing nature (Figure 3(c)) and reducing the metal levels to environmentally permissible limits (Table 1; Figure 4; GB3838-2002, China). The average of pH in RW was 6.14, ranging from 3.96 to 7.41. The pH of RW (6.14) is close to that of NW (7.41), indicating that RW had good effects on buffering the acidity of AMDW. The microcosm RW also ensured regular growth and activity for the microorganisms and benthonic animals (porous texture, well-agglomerated microbes could be seen in the bottom of the system, and there was a large amount of chironormus larva in the water). However, these microorganisms and benthonic animals consumed the DO intensively resulted in anaerobic conditions and maintained a higher salinity than in NW (Figures 3(d) and 3(b)).

3.2. Effects of Remediation on Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Pb, and SO₄²⁻

Compared to the microcosm AMDW, the ecological remediation significantly reduced the concentrations of harmful ions such as Mn, Cu, Zn, and Pb (Table 1 and Figure 4), which have a trend of decreasing with time (Figure 4). Except for Mn, the other metals meet class III of the environmental quality standards for surface water. For SO₄²⁻, remarkable reduction occurred from 120 to 210 d (at the surface of the constructed sediments, Eh: from −90 mV to −255 mV) [8]. Compared to the control microcosms (AMDW), the sulphate concentrations decreased dramatically from 2500 to 1700 mg·L⁻¹ (Figure 4(f); Table 1) due to the high rates of sulphur removal [30]. However, the effect was limited. Despite its sharp decline, it remains at a high level with a value of over 1600 mg·L⁻¹ after 210 d, which was significantly higher than those in the blank microcosms (NW) (<500 mg·L⁻¹).

3.3. Effects of Remediation of Degradation of the Litters

The AMD significantly decreased the degradation rates of the plants growing on the bank or submerged plants compared with NW (Figure 5) and affected the normal ecosystem function of the waters. Under NW conditions, the highest values of the degradation rates of the litters were observed (25–35%), and the rates continuously increased and then became constant with time. After 210 d, the degradation rates of Salix babylonica and Broussonetia papyrifera were 58.1% (Figure 5(a)) and 52.6% (Figure 5(b)), respectively, and those of Ceratophyllum demersum L, Vallisneria natans Hara, and Hydrilla verticillata were 54.8% (Figure 5(c)), 44.6% (Figure 5(d)), and 54.1% (Figure 5(e)), respectively. The degradation rates in AMDW were notably lower than those in NW at the same time (Figure 5), and there are significant differences (Table 2). Additionally, the degradation rates of the above ordered litters after 210 d were only 36.58%, 35.09%, 20.7%, 30.5%, and 25.1%, respectively.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

The degradation trend in RW was consistent with that of NW. RW remediation significantly improved the degradation rate of the litters and became more similar to that of NW over time, which was preferable for the ecosystem function (Figure 5). The rates after 210 d were 44.7%, 46.6%, 49.4%, 43.4%, and 54.3%, respectively, and there were no significant differences in Salix babylonica Ceratophyllum demersum L, Vallisneria natans Hara, and Hydrilla verticillata compared with NW (Table 2). However, the rates still had large variations within NW (Figure 5), which indicated that it will be hard to recover the ecosystem once it is destroyed.

4. Discussion

In this study, we developed a pilot passive system for the remediation of an AMD-polluted ecosystem. This system combined both the floating aerobic wetlands on the surface and constructed anaerobic sediments at the bottom, which can promote vertical interactions between the aerobic vegetation and anaerobic microorganisms (Figure 6). On the lake’s surface, the floating aerobic wetlands are partially installed, and the associated oxidation and hydrolysis reactions can eventually result in the precipitation of dissolved metals [31]. In addition, to some extent, the filtering, uptake, adsorption and exchange by plants, soil, and other biological materials could remove the metals and other ions [3, 32]. At the lake’s bottom, the constructed anaerobic sediments can promote the anaerobic bacterial activity, which ultimately results in a series of reduction reactions and the subsequent precipitation of metal sulphides and generation of alkalinity [12, 33]. The low-cost natural products and wastes such as straw, wood chips and saw dust, spent mushroom compost, mixed manure, and potatoes [34, 35] were used as organic substrates in the AMD treatment systems to create reducing conditions. In this study, we used residual sludge from the municipal wastewater treatment plant as the first organic substances. The sewage sludge contains abundant and easily degradable organic matter, nitrogen, and phosphorus, which can quickly create anaerobic environments for the microbial consortia within the sediments in the pilot experiments. When RW is stable, the organic substrates could continuously be obtained from the surface wetland. Overall, this remediation system involves two parts of the surface and the bottom, providing a combination of aerobic and anaerobic environments and their interactions. The surface floating wetlands provide an ongoing supply of organic substances to the bottom (like acid reduction using microbiology (ARUM) by Kalin [36], which continuously provides nutrients for the reducing bacteria to establish and maintain reductive conditions in the sediment and ameliorate the lake’s pH. Within the bottom constructed sediments, the decomposition of the additive sewage sludge or organic substances from the surface wetlands is always occurring. These processes can form inorganic C, N, and P, which will diffuse to the surface waters for the surface wetland plants to grow and remove metals by the adsorption or exchange from the water column.

Effectively buffering the acidity in these systems is a crucial issue in this study. The generation of alkalinity to buffer the acidity in acidic aquatic ecosystems is a remediation process that occurs spontaneously in nature [37]. The primary production of the photosynthetic organisms (e.g., phytoplankton, periphytic algae, or moss) is associated with natural alkalinity-generating processes in acidic systems [12, 33]. However, consuming acidity by biological reduction in the sediments or under anaerobic conditions plays an important role [33, 38]. In most aquatic ecosystems, the bottom sediments are under anoxic conditions. Under these anaerobic conditions, the nitrate reduction (denitrification), manganese reduction, iron reduction, and sulphate reduction would occur in an orderly fashion [33]. These reduction reactions are mediated by the indigenous microorganisms in anoxic environments where the appropriate electron acceptors (NO₃⁻, Mn⁴⁺, Fe³⁺, and SO₄²⁻) and electron donors (usually organic substances) are present. These processes consume hydrogen ions (H⁺), which leads to an increase in the pH [12, 33].

For those alkalinity-generating processes, RW effectively increased the pH of the waters in the lakes (Figure 3(a)), which promoted the precipitation of metals. Therefore, most metal ions with low K_sp, such as Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn, could form soluble hydroxides or carbonates [39, 40]. The main metal ions, such as Fe and Al, formed hydroxide colloids, which can be adsorbed into organic compounds and several kinds of ions, and then coprecipitated [41, 42]. When these series of reactions progresses, the precipitation of oxides, hydroxides, and other organic particulates can result in the movement of these metals from the water column into the sediments [43]. The bottom constructed sediments will create anaerobic environments. Under these conditions, the anaerobic and sulphate-reducing bacteria can use the sulphate to oxidize the organic matter and release bicarbonate and hydrogen sulphide [44]. Then, the produced hydrogen sulphide readily reacts with the dissolved metals to form insoluble metal sulphides that subsequently precipitate. Ultimately, the elimination of most of the above ions (Figure 4) results in a gradual decline in EC (Figure 3(b)).

The plants on the banks and those that are submerged are more important to the biological component in aquatic ecosystem [45]. The decomposition of these litters plays a vital role in the normal circulation of materials, energy flow, and the health and stability of the aquatic ecosystem [29]. It is of great significance to employ litter degradation as an indicator for evaluating the effects of contamination and eco-remediation. The organic matter will be converted into inorganic matter by a large number of microbes and benthonic animal communities in NW for the continuous degradation of the litter [46], in which the microbes are active, breed normally, and have a better degradation effect (Figure 4) due to the neutral pH and the absence of harmful substances. However, in AMDW, not only are the activity of the aquatic organisms and the richness and quantity of the microbes and benthonic animals markedly inhibited due to the low pH (2.73); high salinity; high concentrations of Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Pb and other toxic elements; and the rust-like suspended particles [33], but the degradation rates of the litters are also decreased. AMD pollution could cause long-term impairment to the waterways and biodiversity, which has serious human health and ecological implications [47].

5. Conclusions

The ecological remediation conducted in this study had good effects on buffering the acidity and removing metals and sulphate, which ultimately improved the water quality and the degradation of litters. However, there are large differences between the NW and RW in the anaerobic situation, primarily in terms of increasing the organic matter. The eco-technological remediation technology may be used as a pretreatment stage for the lake’s water column. More studies are needed to develop a real and a sustainable remediation system in AMDW.

Data Availability

The main table and figure data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Kaiju Chen, Yan Zeng, Zhongzheng Wen, Zhengyan Ran, and Li He worked on conceptualization, investigation, and data curation. Tianling Fu and Hu Wang worked on writing the original draft, review and editing, and visualization. Tianling Fu supervised, reviewed, and edited the manuscript and took part in project administration. Yonggui Wu worked on supervision.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Guizhou Province Science and Technology Agency Fund, China ([2020]3Y006 and [2020]4Y030).

References

J. Plaza-Cazón, L. Benítez, J. Murray, P. Kirschbaum, and E. Donati, “Influence of extremophiles on the generation of acid mine drainage at the abandoned pan de azúcar mine (Argentina),” Microorganisms, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 281, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Guo, S. Fu, J. Di, Y. Dong, and G. Jiang, “Study on the treatment of acid mine drainage containing fe2+ and mn2+ using modified spontaneous combustion gangue,” Journal of Renewable Materials, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 541–555, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Akcil and S. Koldas, “Acid mine drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 14, no. 12-13, pp. 1139–1145, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Naidu, S. Ryu, R. Thiruvenkatachari, Y. Choi, S. Jeong, and S. Vigneswaran, “A critical review on remediation, reuse, and resource recovery from acid mine drainage,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 247, pp. 1110–1124, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Sato, T. Hamai, T. Hori et al., “Optimal start-up conditions for the efficient treatment of acid mine drainage using sulfate-reducing bioreactors based on physicochemical and microbiome analyses,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 423, Article ID 127089, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Skousen, C. E. Zipper, A. Rose et al., “Review of passive systems for acid mine drainage treatment,” Mine Water and the Environment, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 133–153, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Valente and C. Leal Gomes, “Occurrence, properties and pollution potential of environmental minerals in acid mine drainage,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 407, no. 3, pp. 1135–1152, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tang, J. Z. Luo, L. W. Zheng et al., “Characteristics of pores in coals exposed to acid mine drainage,” Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 8772–8783, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Chen, Y. P. Chen, and Y. Lin, “Heavy rainfall events following the dry season elevate metal contamination in Mining-Impacted rivers: a case study of wenyu river, qinling, China,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 335–345, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. DeNicola and M. G. Stapleton, “Using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological integrity of streams remediated for acid mine drainage,” Restoration Ecology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 656–667, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Johnson, P. C. Thompson, L. Gromen, and J. Bowman, “Use of leaf litter breakdown and macroinvertebrates to evaluate gradient of recovery in an acid mine impacted stream remediated with an active alkaline doser,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 186, no. 7, pp. 4111–4127, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. B. Johnson and K. B. Hallberg, “Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 338, no. 1-2, pp. 3–14, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shirin, A. Jamal, C. Emmanouil, and A. K. Yadav, “Assessment of characteristics of acid mine drainage treated with fly ash,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 3910, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Rey, C. A. Ríos, L. Y. Vargas, and T. M. Valente, “Use of natural zeolite-rich tuff and siliceous sand for mine water treatment from abandoned gold mine tailings,” Journal of Geochemical Exploration, vol. 220, Article ID 106660, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Firpo, J. Weiler, and I. A. H. Schneider, “Technosol made from coal waste as a strategy to plant growth and environmental control,” Energy Geoscience, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 160–166, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Kargbo, G. Atallah, and S. Chatterjee, “Inhibition of pyrite oxidation by a phospholipid in the presence of silicate,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 3432–3441, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sasaki, M. Tsunekawa, S. Tanaka, and H. Konno, “Suppression of microbially mediated dissolution of pyrite by originally isolated fulvic acids and related compounds,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 119, no. 2-3, pp. 241–253, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, Y. Y. Qiu, Y. Zhou, G. H. Chen, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, and F. Jiang, “Elemental sulfur as electron donor and/or acceptor: mechanisms, applications and perspectives for biological water and wastewater treatment,” Water Research, vol. 202, Article ID 117373, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Cravotta, “Abandoned mine drainage in the swatara creek basin, southern anthracite coalfield, Pennsylvania, USA: 2. performance of treatment systems,” Mine Water and the Environment, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 200–216, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pat-Espadas, R. Loredo Portales, L. Amabilis-Sosa, G. Gómez, and G. Vidal, “Review of constructed wetlands for acid mine drainage treatment,” Water, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 1685, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. L. Younger, A. Jayaweera, A. Elliot et al., “Passive treatment of acidic mine waters in subsurface-flow systems: exploring RAPS and permeable reactive barriers,” Land Contamination and Reclamation, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 127–135, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. G. Benner, D. W. Blowes, and C. J. Ptacek, “A full-scale porous reactive wall for prevention of acid mine drainage,” Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 99–107, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sharma, J. Vymazal, and P. Malaviya, “Application of floating treatment wetlands for stormwater runoff: a critical review of the recent developments with emphasis on heavy metals and nutrient removal,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 777, Article ID 146044, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Burgess and R. M. Stuetz, “Activated sludge for the treatment of sulphur-rich wastewaters,” Minerals Engineering, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 839–846, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Cao, P. Wu, and Z. Cao, “Element geochemical characteristics of a soil profile developed on dolostone in central Guizhou, southern China: implications for parent materials,” Acta Geochimica, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 445–462, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ma, Z. Quan, Y. Sun, J. Du, and B. Liu, “Excess sulfur and Fe elements drive changes in soil and vegetation at abandoned coal gangues, Guizhou China,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, Article ID 10456, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Hao, F. Yun, L. Zhanyuan, Y. Sen, and Z. Song, “Study on the property and reuse of coal gangue in Liupanshui, Guizhou Province, China,” International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 366–373, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Pan, X. Guan, B. Liu et al., “Pollution characteristics, distribution and ecological risk of potentially toxic elements in soils from an abandoned coal mine area in southwestern China,” Minerals, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 330, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Aerts, “Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship,” Oikos, vol. 79, no. 3, p. 439, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kalin, J. Cairns, and R. McCready, “Ecological engineering methods for acid mine drainage treatment of coal wastes,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 5, no. 2-3, pp. 265–275, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Opitz, M. Alte, M. Bauer, and S. Peiffer, “The role of macrophytes in constructed surface-flow wetlands for mine water treatment: a review,” Mine Water and the Environment, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 587–605, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Rajasulochana and V. Preethy, “Comparison on efficiency of various techniques in treatment of waste and sewage water – a comprehensive review,” Resource-Efficient Technologies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 175–184, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kalin, A. Fyson, and W. N. Wheeler, “The chemistry of conventional and alternative treatment systems for the neutralization of acid mine drainage,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 366, no. 2-3, pp. 395–408, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Y. Chia, K. W. Chew, C. F. Le et al., “Sustainable utilization of biowaste compost for renewable energy and soil amendments,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 267, Article ID 115662, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Grasserová, A. Hanč, P. Innemanová, and T. Cajthaml, “Composting and vermicomposting used to break down and remove pollutants from organic waste: a mini review,” European Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kalin and W. Caetano Chaves, “Acid reduction using microbiology: treating AMD effluent emerging from an abandoned mine portal,” Hydrometallurgy, vol. 71, no. 1-2, pp. 217–225, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Siver, R. Ricard, R. Goodwin, and A. E. Giblin, “Estimating historical in-lake alkalinity generation from sulfate reduction and its relationship to lake chemistry as inferred from algal microfossils,” Journal of Paleolimnology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 179–197, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Totsche, R. Pöthig, W. Uhlmann, H. Büttcher, and C. E. Steinberg, “Buffering mechanisms in acidic mining lakes–a model-based analysis,” Aquatic Geochemistry, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 343–359, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. B. Bradl, “Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 277, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. f. Peng, Y. h. Song, P. Yuan, X. y. Cui, and G. l. Qiu, “The remediation of heavy metals contaminated sediment,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 161, no. 2-3, pp. 633–640, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Alloway, “Soil processes and the behaviour of metals,” Heavy metals in soils, vol. 13, pp. 11–37, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pohl, “Removal of heavy metal ions from water and wastewaters by sulfur-containing precipitation agents,” Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, vol. 231, no. 10, p. 503, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kalin, W. N. Wheeler, and G. Meinrath, “The removal of uranium from mining waste water using algal/microbial biomass,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 151–177, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Shawar, I. Halevy, W. Said-Ahmad et al., “Dynamics of pyrite formation and organic matter sulfurization in organic-rich carbonate sediments,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 241, pp. 219–239, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. G. Janssen, S. Hilt, S. Kosten, J. J. M. Klein, H. W. Paerl, and D. B. Van de Waal, “Shifting states, shifting services: linking regime shifts to changes in ecosystem services of shallow lakes,” Freshwater Biology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Graça, “The role of invertebrates on leaf litter decomposition in streams–a review,” International Review of Hydrobiology, vol. 86, no. 4-5, pp. 383–393, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Crawford, M. Brinkmann, J. D. Ouellet et al., “Remobilization of pollutants during extreme flood events poses severe risks to human and environmental health,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 421, Article ID 126691, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Tianling Fu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

273

Downloads

337

Citations

Journal of Chemistry

Analysis and Remediation of Pollutants in Water and Soil

The Combined Application of Surface Floating Wetlands and Bottom Anaerobic to Remediate AMD-Contaminated Lakes

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Regions

2.2. Simulated Experiments

2.3. Sampling and Analytical Methods

2.4. Data Analysis

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Remediation on pH, EC, Eh, and DO

3.2. Effects of Remediation on Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Pb, and SO42−

3.3. Effects of Remediation of Degradation of the Litters

4. Discussion

5. Conclusions

Data Availability

Conflicts of Interest

Authors’ Contributions

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

3.2. Effects of Remediation on Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Pb, and SO₄²⁻