Abstract

A topological index is a real number associated with chemical constitution purporting for correlation of chemical structure with various physical properties, chemical reactivity, or biological activity. The concept of hyper Zagreb index, first multiple Zagreb index, second multiple Zagreb index, and Zagreb polynomials was established in chemical graph theory based on vertex degrees. It is reported that these indices are useful in the study of anti-inflammatory activities of certain chemical networks. In this paper, we study carbon nanotube networks which are motivated by molecular structure of regular hexagonal lattice and also studied interconnection networks which are motivated by molecular structure of a chemical compound . We determine hyper Zagreb index, first multiple Zagreb index, second multiple Zagreb index, and Zagreb polynomials for some important class of carbon nanotube networks, dominating oxide network, dominating silicate network, and regular triangulene oxide network.

1. Introduction

Multiprocessor interconnection networks are regularly required to associate a huge number of homogeneously repeated processor-memory matches, each of which is known as a preparing hub. Rather than utilizing a mutual memory, all synchronization and communication between processing nodes for program execution is often done via message passing. Outline and utilization of multiprocessor interconnection systems have as of late attracted extensive consideration due to the accessibility of modest, capable microchips, and memory chips. The work systems have been perceived as adaptable interconnection systems for massively parallel computing; see [1]. Work/torus-like low-dimensional systems have as of late gotten a considerable measure of consideration for their better adaptability to bigger systems, rather than more mind boggling systems, for example, hypercubes. There is a lot of relevant works on interdependent networks which can be reviewed. In particular the failure of cooperation on dependent networks has been studied a lot recently in [25].

Particles and subnuclear blends are as often as possible showed by subnuclear graphs. A subnuclear outline is a graph in which vertices are particles of a given molecule and edges are its compound bonds. Since the valency of carbon is four, it is customary to consider all graphs with most outrageous degree under 4, as a molecular outline. An outline with vertex set and edge set is related, if there exists a connection between any match of vertices in . framework is just a connected graph having no various edges and no circles. All through in this article, the level of vertex is implied by and is the amount of edges incident to .

A topological index is a numeric amount connected with a graph which describes the topology of diagram and is invariant under chart automorphism. In more exact way, a topological list of graph is a number with the property that, for each diagram isomorphic to chart , . The idea of topological list originated from work done by Wiener [6] while he was chipping away at breaking point of paraffin. He named this list as way number. Later on, the way number was renamed as Wiener index. The Wiener file is the first and the most concentrated topological file, both from hypothetical perspective and applications, and is characterized as the entirety of separation between all sets of vertices in ; see for details [7, 8].

One of the oldest topological indices is the first Zagreb index introduced by Gutman and Trinajstić based on degree of vertices of in 1972 [4]. The first and second Zagreb indices of a graph are defined as In 2013, Shirdel et al. [9] introduced a new degree based of Zagreb index named “hyper Zagreb index” asGhorbani and Azimi defined two new versions of Zagreb indices of a graph in 2012 [2]. These indices are the first multiple Zagreb index and the second multiple Zagreb index and these indices are defined as follows:The properties of and indices for some chemical structures have been studied in [2, 10].

The first Zagreb polynomial and the second Zagreb polynomial are defined as follows:The properties of and polynomials for some chemical structures have been studied in [3].

Nowadays there is an extensive research activity on , , and indices and and polynomials and their variants; see also [2, 4, 914].

For further study of topological indices of various graph families, see [8, 11, 12, 1427].

2. Carbon Nanotube Networks

The disclosure of the fullerene particles and related types of carbon structures, for example, nanotubes, has created an explosion of movement in science, physical science, and materials science. Traditional fullerene is an all-carbon particle in which the iotas are masterminded on a pseudospherical structure made up altogether of pentagons and hexagons. Its subatomic diagram is a finite trivalent chart installed on the surface of a sphere with just hexagonal and (precisely ) pentagonal appearances. Deza et al. [28] considered fullerene’s augmentation to other shut surfaces and demonstrated that exclusive four surfaces are conceivable, in particular, circle, torus, Klein bottle, and projective plane. Not at all like circular fullerenes, toroidal and Klein container’s fullerenes have been viewed as decorations of whole hexagons on their surfaces since they should contain no pentagons; see [17, 18, 2833].

Carbon nanotubes are allotropes of carbon with a cylindrical nanostructure. These round and hollow carbon atoms have abnormal properties, which are significant for nanotechnology, hardware, optics, and different fields of materials science and innovation. Nanotubes are individuals from the fullerene auxiliary family. Their name is gotten from their long, empty structure.

Let us consider the quadrilateral section with hexagons on the top and bottom sides and hexagons on the lateral sides cut from the regular hexagonal lattice ; see Figure 1.

If we identify two lateral sides of such that we identify vertices and , for , then we obtain nanotube with vertices and edges.

Let be even, , and . If we identify the top and bottom sides of the quadrilateral section in such a way that we identify vertices and , for , and vertices and , for , then we obtain nanotube of order and size .

Recently some well known topological indices, namely, Randić index, atom-bond connectivity index, and geometric arithmetic index for nanotube and nanotube have been studied in [17, 18].

Now we compute hyper Zagreb index , first multiple Zagreb index , second multiple Zagreb index , and Zagreb polynomials and for nanotube .

Theorem 1. Consider nanotube for . Then

Proof. Nanotube has vertices of degree and vertices of degree . The edge set divides into two edge partitions based on degrees of end vertices. The first edge partition contains edges , where . The second edge partition contains edges , where and . Now using (2)–(4), we have

Now we compute hyper Zagreb index , first multiple Zagreb index , second multiple Zagreb index , and Zagreb polynomials and for nanotube .

Theorem 2. Consider nanotube for even and . Then

Proof. Nanotube has vertices of degree and vertices of degree . There are three types of edges in based on degrees of end vertices of each edge; that is, . Edge partition contains edges , where ; edge partition contains edges , where and , and edge partition contains edges , where . Now using (2)–(4), we have

3. Dominating Oxide Network

In , Baig et al. [34] computed general Randić index, atom-bond connectivity index, and geometric arithmetic index of dominating oxide network . In this section, we calculate hyper Zagreb index , first multiple Zagreb index , second multiple Zagreb index , and Zagreb polynomials and for dominating oxide network .

Theorem 3. Consider the dominating oxide network for . Then

Proof. Let be the dominating oxide network. The number of vertices and edges in are and , respectively; see Figure 2. The edge set divides into two edge partitions based on degrees of end vertices. The first edge partition contains edges , where . The second edge partition contains edges , where .

Now using (2)–(4), we have

4. Dominating Silicate Network

In , Baig et al. [34] computed general Randić index, atom-bond connectivity index, and geometric arithmetic index of dominating silicate network . In this section, we calculate hyper Zagreb index , first multiple Zagreb index , second multiple Zagreb index , and Zagreb polynomials and for dominating silicate network .

Theorem 4. Consider the dominating silicate network for . Then

Proof. Let be the dominating silicate network; see Figure 3. The number of vertices and edges in is and , respectively. The edge set divides into four edge partitions based on degrees of end vertices. The first edge partition contains edges , where . The second edge partition contains edges , where . The third edge partition contains edges , where . The fourth edge partition contains edges , where . Now using (2)–(4), we have

5. Regular Triangulene Oxide Network

In , Baig et al. [34] computed general Randić index, atom-bond connectivity index, and geometric arithmetic index of regular triangulene oxide network . Now we compute hyper Zagreb index , first multiple Zagreb index , second multiple Zagreb index , and Zagreb polynomials and for regular triangulene oxide network .

Theorem 5. Consider the regular triangulene oxide network for . Then

Proof. Let be the regular triangulene oxide network; see Figure 4. The number of vertices and edges in is and , respectively. There are three types of edges in based on degrees of end vertices of each edge; that is, . The edge partition contains edges , where ; the edge partition contains edges , where and , and the edge partition contains edges , where .

Now using (2)–(4), we have

6. Conclusion

In this paper we determined hyper Zagreb index , first multiple Zagreb index , second multiple Zagreb index , and Zagreb polynomials and for nanotubes and , dominating oxide network , dominating silicate network , and regular triangulene oxide network .

In the future, we are interested in designing some new architectures/networks and then studying their topological indices which will be quite helpful to understand their underlying topologies.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.