Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Computer Systems, Networks, and Communications
Volume 2008, Article ID 481046, 9 pages
Research Article

Performance Evaluation of the WSN Routing Protocols Scalability

Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Dearborn, MI48128-2406, USA

Received 22 July 2008; Accepted 23 December 2008

Academic Editor: Cheng-Xiang Wang

Copyright © 2008 L. Alazzawi and A. Elkateeb. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Becker, S. Schaust, and E. Wittmann, “Performance of routing protocols for real wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (SPECTS '07), San Diego, Calif, USA, July 2007.
  2. Y. Eiko and J. Bacon, “Wireless sensor network technologies: research trends and middleware's role,” Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, September 2005, View at Google Scholar
  3. X. Renyi and W. Guozheng, “A survey on routing in wireless sensor networks,” Progress in Natural Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 261–269, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. G. Simon, P. Volgyesi, M. Maroti, and A. Ledeczi, “Simulation-based optimization of communication protocols for large-scale wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Aerospace Conference (CDROM), vol. 3, pp. 1339–1346, Big Sky, Mont, USA, March 2003.
  5. A. Kini and V. Veeraraghavan, “Fast and Efficient Randomized Flooding on Latticesensor Networks,” Center for Telecommunications and Information Networking group, 2004.
  6. R. Fonseca, “Beacon vector routing: towards scalable point-to-point routing in deeply embedded networks,” Final Report, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  7. T. Roosta and M. Menzo, “Probabilistic geographic routing protocol for ad hoc and sensor networks,” Department of EECS UC Berkeley, 2004.
  8. A. Hac, Wireless Sensor Network Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  9. A. El Gamal, J. Mammen, B. Prabhakar, and D. Shah, “Throughput-delay trade-off in wireless networks,” in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Joint Conference of IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM '04), vol. 1, pp. 464–475, Hong Kong, March 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. O. Chipara, Z. He, G. Xing et al., “Real-time power-aware routing in sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS '06), pp. 83–92, New Haven, Conn, USA, June 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. Y.-S. Yen, S. Hong, R.-S. Chang, and H.-C. Chao, “An energy efficient and coverage guaranteed wireless sensor network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC '07), pp. 2923–2928, Hong Kong, March 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Park, A. Savvides, and M. B. Srivastava, “SensorSim: a simulation framework for sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM '00), pp. 104–111, Boston, Mass, USA, August 2000.
  13. P. Levis, N. Lee, M. Welsh, and D. Culler, “TOSSIM: accurate and scalable simulation of entire TinyOS applications,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '03), pp. 126–137, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, November 2003.
  14. “The ns manual,” The VINT project, November 2008,
  15. OPNET Technologies, Inc., Bethesda, Md, USA: The OPNET Simulator,
  16. “Prowler: Probabilistic Wireless Network Simulator,” Institute for Software Integrated Systems (ISIS),