Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Computer Networks and Communications
Volume 2013, Article ID 176217, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/176217
Research Article

Angry Apps: The Impact of Network Timer Selection on Power Consumption, Signalling Load, and Web QoE

Institute of Computer Science, University of Würzburg, Chair of Communication Networks, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany

Received 2 November 2012; Revised 23 January 2013; Accepted 13 February 2013

Academic Editor: Pedro Merino

Copyright © 2013 Christian Schwartz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Cuadrado and J. Dueñas, “Mobile application stores: success factors, existing approaches, and future developments,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 160–167, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. Cisco, “Cisco visual networking index: global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2011–2016,” White Paper, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  3. TS 25.331, “Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification,” 3GPP Std., 2012.
  4. F. Qian, Z. Wang, A. Gerber, Z. Mao, S. Sen, and O. Spatscheck, “Profiling resource usage for mobile applications: a cross-layer approach,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '11), pp. 321–334, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Qian, Z. Wang, A. Gerber, Z. M. Mao, S. Sen, and O. Spatscheck, “Characterizing radio resource allocation for 3G networks,” in Proceedings of the 10th Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '10), pp. 137–150, Melbourne, Australia, November 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Nokia Siemens Networks, “Understanding smartphone behavior in the network,” White Paper, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. C. Yang, “Huawei communicate: weather the signalling storm,” White Paper, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. Ickin, K. Wac, M. Fiedler, L. Janowski, J. Hong, and A. Dey, “Factors influencing quality of experience of commonly used mobile applications,” IEEE Communications, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 48–56, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. T. Hoßfeld, D. Hausheer, F. Hecht et al., “An economic traffic management approach to enable the TripleWin for users, ISPs, and overlay providers,” in Towards the Future Internet—A European Research Perspective, G. Tselentis, J. Domingue, A. Galis et al., Eds., pp. 24–34, IOS Press Books Online, May 2009. View at Google Scholar
  10. D. D. Clark, J. Wroclawski, K. R. Sollins, and R. Braden, “Tussle in cyberspace: defining tomorrow's internet,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 462–475, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Trilogy Project, “D2—lessons in “designing for tussle” from case studies,” Deliverable of the Trilogy Project ICT-216372, 2008.
  12. S. Egger, P. Reichl, T. Hoßfeld, and R. Schatz, “Time is bandwidth? Narrowing the gap between subjective time perception and quality of experience,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications (ICC '12), p. 1325, Ottawa, Canada, June 2012.
  13. P. H. J. Perälä, A. Barbuzzi, G. Boggia, and K. Pentikousis, “Theory and practice of RRC state transitions in UMTS networks,” in Proceedings of the Global Communication Conference (GLOBECOM '09), pp. 1–6, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, December 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. GSMAssociation and others, “Network efficiency task force fast dormancy best practices,” White Paper, May 2010. View at Google Scholar
  15. F. Qian, Z. Wang, A. Gerber, Z. M. Mao, S. Sen, and O. Spatscheck, “TOP: tail optimization protocol for cellular radio resource allocation,” in Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP '10), pp. 285–294, Kyoto, Japan, October 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. TR 22.801, “Study on non-MTC Mobile Data Applications impacts (Release 11),” 3GPP Std., 2011.
  17. A. Díaz Zayas and P. Merino Gómez, “A testbed for energy profile characterization of IP services in smartphones over live networks,” Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 330–343, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Schwartz, T. Hoßfeld, F. Lehrieder, and P. Tran-Gia, “Performance analysis of the trade-off between signalling load and power consumption for popular smartphone apps in 3G networks,” Tech. Rep. 485, University of Würzburg, January 2013. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Calder and M. K. Marina, “Batch scheduling of recurrent applications for energy savings on mobile phones,” in Proceedings of the 7th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON '10), pp. 1–3, Boston, Mass, USA, June 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Vergara and S. Nadjm-Tehrani, ““Energy-aware cross-layer burst buffering for wireless communication,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Future Energy Systems: Where Energy, Computing and Communication Meet, p. 24, Madrid, Spain, May 2012.
  21. S. Egger, T. Hoßfeld, R. Schatz, and M. Fiedler, “Waiting times in quality of experience for web based services,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX '12), pp. 86–96, Yarra Valley, Australia, July 2012.