Review Article

Survey of Green Radio Communications Networks: Techniques and Recent Advances

Table 4

Evaluation of the energy-efficient solutions reviewed in this paper.

ApproachTechniquesEnergy savings/enhancementsConsiderationsComments

Power amplifier improvementDigital predistorted Doherty-architectures and GaN [22]Up to 50%Linearity
PAPR
Cost
Improvement depends on a special design and material
CFR and DPD with Doherty [18, 22]
class-AB with digital predistortion [11]Approximately 50%
class J amplifier [11]70% to 90%
inverse class F [23]74%
Switched-mode power amplifier (SMPA) [22, 24]80–90%

Time domain energy-efficientUnicast [27]40% to 50%Synchronising
UE battery life
QoS
Energy savings depend on the PA operating time
MBSFN [27, 30]55%
DTX [28]Up to 85%
Optimise subframes per frame [31]90%

Cell switch on/offIncrease ON cell radius [35, 36]Residential scenario [35]37.5%Coverage
UE battery life
QoS
Energy savings depend on the number of BSs and the period of time over which each of the BSs is switched off
Office scenario [35]25–50%
Hierarchical scenario [35]17%
Uniform scenario [36]26–40.7%
Hierarchical scenario [36]30%
Switch off any fraction of the cell according to a deterministic traffic scheme [37]25–30%
Optimise the number of active BSs [9]12–40%
Ecological protocooperation [38]72.9%
Maximum average distance between BSs [39]29%

Energy-efficient architecturesCell Zooming [4245] Up to 40%Interference
Dead zone problem
Must take into account interference management between heterogeneous environments
HetNets [22, 46, 55]Macrocell-microcell 44%
Macrocell-picocell 60%
Macrocell-femtocell78–80%
Relay [57, 59] 8%–18%

Transmission scheme Reduce the number of antennae [69, 70]50%, depending on the number of antennae.QoS
Impact on the UE
Energy savings depend on the number of antennae that will be switched off