Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Computer Networks and Communications
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 562546, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/562546
Research Article

TETRA Backhauling via Satellite: Improving Call Setup Times and Saving Bandwidth

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234 Weßling, Germany

Received 15 July 2014; Accepted 19 September 2014; Published 16 October 2014

Academic Editor: Lixin Gao

Copyright © 2014 Anton Donner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Globalstar, 2013, http://www.globalstar.com/.
  2. Iridium, July 2013, http://www.iridium.com.
  3. Emergesat, Humanitarian crisis management tool, 2013, http://www.emergesat.org/.
  4. M. Berioli, J. M. Chaves, N. Courville et al., “WISECOM: a rapidly deployable satellite backhauling system for emergency situations,” International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 419–440, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Novak, “Viability of ISI-based TETRA over satellite,” WSEAS Transactions on Communications, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 765–775, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. ETSI and Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA), “Voice plus data (V+D); part 2: air interface (AI),” ETSI European Standard EN 300 392-2 V3.2.1, European Telecommunications Standards Institute, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  7. Motorola, “Interconnecting TETRA systems,” White Paper, Motorola, 2009, http://www.tetramou.com/Library/Documents/TETRAResources/Library/InterconnectingTETRAsystems.pdf.
  8. P. Kämppi, J. Tyni, and J. Rajamäki, “Gathering end-user requirements for the MACICO public safety communications project,” International Journal of Communications, vol. 8, pp. 37–42, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  9. R. Steele, C.-C. Lee, and P. Gould, GSM, cdmaOne and 3G Systems, John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
  10. ETSI, “Terrestrial trunked radio (TETRA); functional requirements for the TETRA ISI derived from three country pilot scenarios,” ETSI Technical Report TR 101 448 V1.1.1, European Telecommunications Standards Institute, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Varga, “The OMNeT++ discrete event simulation system,” in Proceedings of the 15th European Simulation Multiconference (ESM '01), pp. 319–324, Prague, Czech Republic, June 2001.
  12. “Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA); Voice plus Data (V+D); Part 3: Interworking at the Inter-System Interface (ISI); Sub-part 2: Additional Network Feature Individual Call (ANF-ISIIC),” (ETSI European Standard EN 300 392-3-2 V1.4.1), European Telecommunications Standards Institute, August 2010.
  13. M. Allman, C. Hayes, H. Kruse, and S. Osterman, “TCP performance over satellite links,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, March 1997.
  14. T. R. Henderson and R. H. Katz, “Transport Protocols for Internet-compatible satellite networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 326–343, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Caini, R. Firrincieli, M. Marchese et al., “Transport layer protocols and architectures for satellite networks,” International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Mogul and S. Deering, Path MTU Discovery (IETF RFC 1191), The Internet Society, 1990.
  17. M. Allman, D. Glover, and L. Sanchez, “Enhancing TCP over satellite channels using standard mechanisms (IETF RFC 2844),” The Internet Society, January 1999.
  18. M. Allman, S. Dawkins, D. Glover et al., Ongoing TCP research related to satellites (IETF RFC 2844), The Internet Society, 2000.
  19. J. Border, M. Kojo, J. Griner, G. Montenegro, and Z. Shelby, “Performance enhancing proxies intended to mitigate link-related degradations (IETF RFC 3135),” The Internet Society, June 2001.
  20. Delay Tolerant Networking Research Group, http://dtnrg.org.
  21. N. Ehsan, M. Liu, and R. J. Ragland, “Evaluation of performance enhancing proxies in internet over satellite,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 513–534, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y.-C. Kao and C.-N. Lee, “Proxy-assisted P2P and multicast transmission schemes for layered-video streaming over wireless networks,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 23, no. 9-10, pp. 1167–1188, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Inmarsat BGAN, “Global voice and broadband data,” Inmarsat, http://www.inmarsat.com.
  24. J. Dunlop, D. Girma, and J. Irvine, Digital Mobile Communications and the TETRA System, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2000.
  25. Voice over IP—per call bandwidth consumption. Cisco. Document ID 7934, 2006, http://www.cisco.com/image/gif/paws/7934/bwidth consume.pdf.
  26. C. Bormann, C. Burmeister, M. Degermark et al., “RObust Header Compression (ROHC): Framework and four profiles: RTP, UDP, ESP, and uncompressed (IETF RFC 3095),” The Internet Society, July 2001.