|
|
Protocol and publication year |
Architecture |
Metric for link/path selection |
Multipath support |
Service diff. |
Hole bypassing |
Security |
Location aware |
Data delivery model |
Cross-layer support |
Scalability |
Mobility |
Energy efficiency |
Load balancing |
Reliability |
Congestion support |
Reduce packet drops |
Priority |
Adjust TX power |
Avoid interpath interference |
Simulator/software |
Compared with |
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
|
ReInForM
[68]
IEEE 2003 | Flat | () Hop count
() Desired reliability
() Channel error rate | √ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | √ | √ | — | — | √ | — | — | — | Flooding | () Reliable
() Efficient load balancing
() Dynamic | () Higher bandwidth
utilization
() More energy consumption |
Mahapatra et al. [29]
Elsevier 2006 | Flat | () Distance
() Delay
() Remaining energy | √ | √ (simple) | — | — | √ | Query | — | — | √ | √ | — | √ | √ | — | √ | — | — | NS-2
[87] | GEAR [96] | () Reliable
() Improve N/w lifetime
() Deadline aware
() Congestion control support | () Extra overhead
() Unacceptable path discovery latency for some random packets |
MMSPEED
[30]
IEEE 2006 | Flat | () Delay
() Distance
() Reaching probability | √ | √ | — | — | √ | Query | √ | √ | √ | — | — | √ | — | — | √ | — | — | J-SIM [97] | SPEED [21] | () Reliable
() Timeliness
() Multispeed | () More energy consumption
() Less N/w lifetime |
Multimedia-aware MMSPEED
[31]
IEEE 2008 | Flat | () Delay
() Distance
() Reaching probability | √ | √ | — | — | √ | Query | √ | √ | √ | — | √ | √ | — | — | √ | — | — | J-SIM [97]
Evalvid [95] | MMSPEED
[30] | () High PSNR
() Reliable
() Timeliness | () More energy consumption
() Less N/w lifetime |
RPAR [32]
IEEE 2006
| Flat
| () Distance
() Delay
() Remaining energy | — | — | √ | — | √ | Query | — | √ | — | √ | — | — | — | — | √ | √ | — | Prowler
[98] | Self-baseline MaxV and MinE | () Real-time
() Energy efficient
() Improve N/W lifetime | () Pathological behavior of congested nodes
() Performance degrades with large holes |
REAR [33]
IEEE 2008 | Flat | () Remaining energy
() Distance
() Delay | — | — | — | — | √ | Event | — | — | — | √ | √ | — | — | — | √ | — | — | — | SAR [44] | () Real-time
() Improve N/W lifetime
| () Unreliable
() Use of metadata for routing decision |
Dong et al.
[65]
Springer 2009 | Hierarchical | () Bandwidth
() Delay
() Jitter | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | √ | — | √ | — | — | — | Waxman Model [99] | — | () Multiple constraint based
() High routing successful ratio | () Convergence rate is uncertain
() Less N/w lifetime |
ASARC [34]
IEEE 2011 | Hierarchical | () Residual energy
() Distance
() Delay | √ | — | — | √ | √ | Event | — | — | — | √ | √ | √ | — | — | √ | — | — | NS-2
[87] | REAR [33]
M-IAR [100] | () Reliable
() Secure
() Low latency | () More complexity
() Extra overhead
() Energy consumption due to extra overhead |
EEIAMR [35]
IEEE 2011 | Flat | () Hop count
() Distance
() Residual energy | √ | — | √ | — | — | Event | — | — | — | √ | √ | √ | — | — | — | — | √ | NS-2
[87] | MR2 [101] | () Reliable
() Interference aware transmission | () Partial node-disjoint paths
() Less number of paths |
HLEAR [50]
IEEE 2011 | Flat | () Hop count
() Current traffic load
() Residual energy | √ | — | √ | — | — | Event | — | — | — | √ | √ | √ | — | — | — | — | — | NS-2
[87] | TINY AODV | () Increasing throughput
() Traffic load aware
() Avoid creation of
holes near sink | () At low data rates more energy consumption
() Partial node-disjoint paths |
Kim et al.
[36]
Springer 2011 | Hierarchical | () Residual energy
() Distance
() Bandwidth | √ | — | √ | √ | — | — | — | — | — | — | √ | √ | √ | — | — | — | — | — | — | () Secure
() Congestion control support
() Separate control and data paths | () More energy consumption
() Less N/w lifetime
() More complexity |
AMPMCR
[51]
IEEE 2012 | Hierarchical | () Delay
() PLR
() Remaining energy | √ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | √ | √ | — | √ | — | — | — | NS-2
[87] | HQAX [62] | () Low delay
() High PDR
() Less packet drops
() Adaptive multiconstraint | () Clock synchronization problem
() More energy consumption due to flooding |
SPEA [69]
Elsevier 2015 | Flat | () Node delay
() ETX
() Number of hops | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | √ | — | √ | — | — | √ | NS-2
[87] | DSR [102] | () Multiobjective
() High throughput
(3) Low delay | () Less N/w lifetime
() More complexity |
MAEE [52]
IEEE 2015 | Flat | () Remaining energy
() ETX
() Buffer size | √ | — | √ | — | — | Event | — | — | — | √ | √ | √ | — | √ | √ | — | — | NS-2
[87] | EEPMQR [103] | () Reliable
() Low delay | () Not scalable
() Not completely efficient |
EEQAR [53]
IEEE 2015 | Hierarchical | () Remaining energy
() Trust value
() Data correlation coefficient | √
Only intercluster | — | √ | — | √ | — | — | — | √ | √ | √ | — | — | — | — | √ | — | NS-2
[87] | — | () Improve N/w lifetime
() Mobility support | () Complex
() No priority
() No comparison with previous schemes |
CUDAR [54]
Springer 2015 | Flat | () Average PST
() Channel utilization
() Remaining energy | — | — | √ | — | — | Event | √ | √ | — | — | √ | √ | √ | √ | — | — | — | NS-2
[87] | GPSR [74]
HLEAR [50] | () Multisource
() High throughput
() Low delay | () Less N/W lifetime
() No service differentiation |
|
