Table 6:
The performance comparison between our approach and methods in [
8
,
10
,
13
,
14
].
Method
AR (%)
FNR (%)
FPR (%)
TO (s)
Shi et al. [
8
]
95.75
4.29
6.62
42.68
Ma et al. [
10
]
91.04
2.65
7.11
18.92
Wu et al. [
13
]
91.52
8.48
1.50
32.08
Song et al. [
14
]
93.47
4.42
7.43
38.27
Our approach
94.04
7.42
6.14
31.75