Research Article  Open Access
R. I. Barabash, V. Agarwal, S. Koric, I. Jasiuk, J. Z. Tischler, "Finite Element Simulation and XRay Microdiffraction Study of Strain Partitioning in a Layered Nanocomposite", Journal of Crystallography, vol. 2016, Article ID 4351347, 11 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4351347
Finite Element Simulation and XRay Microdiffraction Study of Strain Partitioning in a Layered Nanocomposite
Abstract
The depthdependent strain partitioning across the interfaces in the growth direction of the NiAl/Cr(Mo) nanocomposite between the Cr and NiAl lamellae was directly measured experimentally and simulated using a finite element method (FEM). Depthresolved Xray microdiffraction demonstrated that in the asgrown state both Cr and NiAl lamellae grow along the direction with the formation of asgrown distinct residual ~0.16% compressive strains for Cr lamellae and ~0.05% tensile strains for NiAl lamellae. Threedimensional simulations were carried out using an implicit FEM. First simulation was designed to study residual strains in the composite due to cooling resulting in formation of crystals. Strains in the growth direction were computed and compared to those obtained from the microdiffraction experiments. Second simulation was conducted to understand the combined strains resulting from cooling and mechanical indentation of the composite. Numerical results in the growth direction of crystal were compared to experimental results confirming the experimentally observed trends.
1. Introduction
Strain partitioning is the most important phenomenon responsible for unique properties of composites [1–7]. The role of interfaces in strain partitioning in composites was emphasized by a number of authors [8, 9]. In particular, Nibased [3] and especially NiAlbased composites are the focus of current research because they can operate at high temperatures (up to 1300°C) in corrosive environments [10–17]. They can be used for high temperature applications including structural components in energy conversion facilities, for example. It was shown that small additions of Mo (up to 6 at%) change the morphology of the Cr phase from rodlike to lamellar [11, 18]. Therefore, NiAl/Cr(Mo) system has recently attracted attention because both phases grow into lamellae during crystallization [10, 11, 18–22]. However, the mechanism of strain partitioning in these alloys and the role of interfaces in load transfer from one phase to another are still poorly understood. These open issues provided motivation for this study.
Spherical indentation is one of the possible techniques to study the strain partitioning under loading in these alloys. The advantage of using spherical indentation as compared to uniaxial tension/compression measurements is that during indentation the deformation is changing from the maximum under an indent to zero in the area not affected by the indentation. Therefore, all information about the indentationinduced strain partitioning is confined in a relatively small volume which can be both assessed experimentally and simulated with FE. The spherical shape of the indent was chosen in order to prevent the interplay between the specific shape of the indent with the crystal lattice anisotropy.
2. Materials and Experimental Procedures
2.1. Growth of NiAl/Cr(Mo) Eutectic Alloys
The NiAlCr phase diagram has a eutectic composition at 34 at% Cr at the temperature °C. The eutectic temperature is lower than the melting temperature of Cr (°C) and of NiAl (°C) [13]. The elastic moduli of pure NiAl and Cr single crystals along the directions are 277 and 248 GPa, respectively [11]. The lattice parameters mismatch is ~0.1%. In this study, the NiAl/Cr alloys were additionally alloyed by 3 at% Mo to obtain a lamellar microstructure of the composite. Therefore, the lattice parameters of the NiAl and Cr(Mo) lamellae were measured in this study before indentation. The NiAl/Cr(Mo) samples were directionally crystallized leading to the formation of the wellaligned NiAl and Cr lamellae (Figure 1(a)). The details of the alloy preparation and eutectic growth can be found elsewhere [10, 11]. The spacing and relative size of lamellae depend on the growth rate and composition, and under the conditions of this experiment, they resulted in approximately parallel lamellae with nearly equal thickness with periodicity of ~1.2 μm. Cr (3% Mo) lamellae have a BCC structure while intermetallic NiAl lamellae have an ordered CsCltype B2 structure [5]. Both NiAl and Cr (3% Mo) lamellae grow along the direction, forming heterointerfaces parallel to type planes in both phases [11]. Mo is mainly found in the Cr lamellae, although small traces of Mo are also present in NiAl lamellae. Thus, lattice parameters of the two lamellae types differ from those of pure NiAl and Cr.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Sample preparation was as follows. Samples were cut from a directionally solidified Cr(Mo)NiAl eutectic rod perpendicular to the growth direction (cross section), mounted in epoxy, and then polished. Two kinds of samples were prepared: (1) in the first sample, the matrix was etched away at the depth of ~5 μm; this sample was used to determine residual asgrown stresses in the lamellae; (2) the second sample was only slightly etched (several nm) to reveal the microstructure (Figure 1(a)). This sample was further indented and studied for strain partitioning between lamellae. The orientations of the lamellae along the growth direction were determined from the Laue pattern.
The alternating Cr/NiAl lamellae are visible on the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the sample cross section (Figure 1(a)). The orientation of the surface normal was along the direction for both Cr and NiAl lamellae.
2.2. Indentation
Spherical indentation on the polished surface perpendicular to the growth direction was conducted with an MTS Nano Indenter XP equipped with a sapphire tip with radius of 100 μm to a prescribed load of mN. Loaddisplacement curves were recorded for each indentation (Figure 1(b)). The maximum force during indentation reached 1,000 mN and the displacement during indentation did not exceed 1100 nm. These parameters were further used in simulations of the indentationinduced deformations.
2.3. DepthResolved XRay Strain Microscopy
Synchrotron polychromatic Xray microdiffraction (PXM) was performed at the 34IDE beamline of the Advanced Photon Source at the Argonne National Laboratory with a focused ~0.3 × 0.4 μm beam with an energydependent penetration depth ~30–50 μm. The energy range of the polychromatic microbeam was within 5–27 keV. PXM allowed studying orientation spread within the irradiated volume using a modified Laue technique. The experimental setup of the beamline permits moving the monochromator into the beam and working with monochromatic radiation as well. Measurements with monochromatic radiation provide information about dilatational strain gradients. Measurements with both polychromatic (Laue) and monochromatic radiation were performed. In this setup, the Xray microbeam intercepts the sample surface at ~45° and penetrates into the depth of the NiA/Cr(Mo) sample reaching ~50 μm. Therefore, the diffracted radiation integrates inputs from all depths and lamellae intercepted by the beam. To disentangle this depthintegrated intensity and to obtain depthresolved information about individual submicronsize lamellae, a special differentialaperture Xray microscopy (DAXM) technique was applied [11, 23–27]. With the DAXM technique, a platinum wire with a diameter of ~50 μm serves as a differential aperture. During the depthresolved measurements, the wire is moving parallel to the sample surface in the diffracted radiation field and shadows portion by portion the Laue patterns, depending on the relative position of the wire and the sample surface. Typically, for each measured location, about ~400 partially shadowed images are taken. Together with initial depthintegrated Laue pattern, these 400 patterns are analyzed using a raytracing algorithm. As a result, complete depthresolved information on the intensity from each micrometer of depth is recovered.
The DAXM technique can be performed using a polychromatic (PDAXM) or monochromatic (MDAXM) radiation [28]. Both techniques allow obtaining information with a 1 μm depth resolution. PDAXM reveals lattice orientation gradients with depth, while MDAXM gives information about dilatational strain gradients with depth. In order to perform MDAXM measurements, first the complete Laue pattern should be obtained and indexed using a depthintegrated PXM. After indexation, the energy corresponding to a maximal intensity of the specific , , reflection, , is determined and is used as a mean energy for the energyscans. The energyscan can be performed in steps within the above energy range around the mean value. Furthermore, for each energy value, the depthresolved measurements with platinum wire were performed. Such depthresolved energyscans, MDAXM, provided unique detailed information about the phasespecific dilatational strain gradient with depth. Both PDAXM and MDAXM were used in this study.
For spherical indentation, it is important that the depthresolved Xray strain microscopy allows for resolving strains with 1 μm steps in the depth along the beam path. The 0.3 × 0.4 μm size of the beam is smaller than the thickness of individual lamellae allowing for resolving strain information separately from NiAl and Cr lamellae. The characteristic length of strain changes, socalled “slip zone,” typically extends over 10–20 μm in depth. Therefore, the 1 μm step size gives a unique possibility of measuring the depthresolved strain gradients and further compare them with strains obtained using FE simulations.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Residual asGrown Stresses
An SEM image of the cross section of the sample shows alternating NiAl and Cr lamellae with the total thickness of 1200 nm (Figure 1(a)). The area of the indent is marked by a dashed circle (Figure 1(a)). Stereographic projection obtained from an undeformed region with PDAXM method (Figure 1(c)) unambiguously indicates that both kinds of lamellae grow along the crystallographic direction. Both NiAl and Cr lamellae contain small amounts (up to 3%) of Mo which affects the value of the lattice spacing. The reference samples for these compositions of lamellae cannot be prepared and measured independently because the melting point of Mo is much higher than, for example, the boiling point of Al. Therefore, it is practically impossible to prepare these compositions without crystallizing a composite. In order to determine strains in the composite constituents, it was necessary first to measure the strainfree lattice spacing of both phases as they differ from theoretical values for pure NiAl and Cr. With the synchrotron PXM and DAXM measurements, the differences of the reciprocal lattice spacings for , , reflection, , are determined more precisely than their absolute values. The reciprocal lattice spacings of the NiAl and Cr(Mo) are relatively close and it was possible to measure them simultaneously in one scan, which essentially improved the accuracy of the result. To get information about the possible asgrown residual strains, the depthresolved reciprocal lattice spacings were measured with MDAXM in the first sample, where matrix was etched away at the depth of ~5 micrometers. As both lamellae kinds grow along the crystallographic direction, the reflection for both lamellae kinds was chosen to study the strain gradients. The reflections for both NiAl and Cr(Mo) lamellae are close in both the orientation space and their absolute values. The relatively small difference between the NiAl and Cr inverse lattice spacing, corresponding to reflection, allowed for measuring both of them in one scan. Therefore, the mean energy value for this energyscan was chosen in the middle between the energies corresponding to the NiAl and Cr reflections. The energy of the beam was scanned in the range corresponding to the reflection with a step of 3 eV for both samples within the range of keV including the reflections for both phases (Figure 2(a)). The small Xray beam size (<0.5 μm) allowed nondestructive measurements of lattice rotations and strains in the individual phasespecific mesoscale lamellae at different depths. The protruding out of the matrix Cr(Mo) lamellae are strain/stressfree. The beam coming at 45° to the sample surface is intercepting Cr(Mo) lamellae onebyone as it penetrates the sample (Figure 1(d)). First, the beam probes several Cr(Mo) lamellae tops before penetrating the depth of the sample. All of them are stressfree and have the same strainfree reciprocal lattice spacing distinct from the bulk value. It results in the plateau of values at nm^{−1} corresponding to the strain/stressfree reciprocal lattice spacing of Cr(Mo) lamellae (Figure 2(a)). Initially, in this depth region, the zero intensity is diffracted from NiAl, as the matrix is etched away. Therefore, no signal from the NiAl matrix is observed in the area of etched matrix. Eventually, the beam is penetrating into the depth of the sample probing simultaneously Cr and NiAl lamellae (Figure 1(d)). In the bulk of the composite, the NiAl and Cr(Mo) lamellae constrain each other and have distinct constrained reciprocal lattice spacings (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). As the thickness of lamellae is less than a micron, the intensity diffracted by both lamellae kinds alternates. This relates to two other plateaus of values with depth determined by the asgrown strained value of the reciprocal lattice spacing for both kinds of lamellae at and nm^{−1} for Cr(Mo) and NiAl lamellae, correspondingly. Line profiles corresponding to the two distinct depths are shown in Figure 2(b). One profile (green open circles) corresponds to the nearsurface stressfree values for both lamellae kinds, while another one (red filled squares) corresponds to deep bulk values for both phases (Figure 2(b)). The level of residual asgrown stresses estimated from the difference between these two values results in a 0.16% compressive stress for the Cr(Mo) lamellae and almost three times smaller, ~0.05%, tensile stress for the NiAl matrix. These values are almost an order of magnitude smaller than those in the NiAl/Mo composite [12].
(a)
(b)
3.2. Axial Texture
Indentationinduced strain partitioning was studied on the second sample without etching of the NiAl matrix. While both kinds of lamella grow along the direction, an axial texture is observed in the cross section. It is visible on both the SEM image of the cross sections (Figure 1(a)) and the pole figure calculated from the whitebeam diffraction for the pole (Figure 3(a)). The inplane direction of the lamellae colonies slightly varies from colony to colony. The axial texture also varies with depth which is indicated by a different color of the threedimensional (3D) slice of the sample (Figure 3(b)). Each color at this figure corresponds to a different orientation. The purple color corresponds to one colony of lamellae which was chosen for the analysis and represents mainly the area unaffected by the indentation. Deeper, below this colony, an orange color corresponds to the lamellae colony with a different orientation. Both purple and orange colors refer to the colors at the inverse pole figure (Figure 3(a)). Above the purple grain, no definitive orientation can be detected; different colors are all mixed; this corresponds to the highly deformed nearsurface indented area.
(a)
(b)
The triple junction between the three colonies was chosen for indentation to compare if there is any significant dependence of the depthresolved straingradients partitioning on the axial reorientation between different colonies. The indented area was first mapped in 3D with depthresolved whitebeam measurements and the regions of the largest deformation were found, region of mixed colors (Figure 3(b)). The probed area corresponds to the colony marked with purple color underneath the indent. In the most damaged nearsurface indented area, the orientation of the affected lamellae changes stochastically and does not show any definitive orientation indicated by different colors.
3.3. IndentationInduced Strain Partitioning along the Growth Direction between the Cr and NiAl Lamellae
Strain partitioning was characterized by 3D depthresolved monochromatic measurements of the reciprocal lattice spacing with the Xray microbeam probing the sample along the two beam paths marked as (1) and (2) in Figure 1(a). The measurement starting at location 1 is taken in the most affected area while measurement starting at location (2) probes mostly unaffected area and is used as reference.
The measured misfit between the two lamellae along the growth direction in the strainfree nearsurface region is ~1.6%, while in the bulk of the composite it is ~0.86% due to residual strains.
Starting at location 1, the beam intercepts the sample surface in the area of largest deformation near the center of the indent (Figure 1(a)). Depthdependent reciprocal lattice spacing measurements for Cr solid solution and NiAl lamellae (Figure 4(a)) demonstrate distinct signs and amplitudes of strain distributions between these two phases: the NiAl reciprocal lattice spacing decreases ~0.26% near the surface revealing that the nearsurface deformed NiAl lamellae are slightly under compression. At the same deformed location, the Cr lamellae are under tension compared to the bulk composite value for Cr. The Cr lattice parameter in the affected region is 0.47% larger than that in the bulk of the composite (Figure 4(b)). Tensile strains in the Cr lamellae first slightly increase with depth and reach their maximum value of ~0.54% at a depth of 6 μm; then, the strain amplitude decreases, and at a depth of ~20 μm, they saturate at their undeformed bulk values for both lamellae phases.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
The observation of distinct sign and amplitude strain distributions in the neighboring Cr and NiAl lamellae likely depends on the ratio between the elastic moduli of the Cr and NiAl neighboring lamellae and on the existing asgrown residual stresses.
3.4. Numerical Implementation and Computational Challenges: Simulation of Indentation in NiAlCr Composite
In parallel with the experiments described above, finite element simulations were conducted in order to compute residual strains and indentationinduced strains in the NiAlCr composite. 3D numerical simulations were carried out with the implicit finite element method (FEM) using a software Abaqus/Standard [29].
In order to identify the optimum mesh size, a mesh refinement study was performed. The domains were discretized using 20node quadratic hexahedral elements with two levels of refinement: coarse and refined. The coarse mesh had more than 730,000 degrees of freedom (DOFs), while the refined mesh had almost 5 million DOFs. Material nonlinearities arising from anisotropic plastic material properties, geometric nonlinearities from large deformations, and complex contact conditions lead to increased illconditioning due to the element shape distortion in the mesh refinement. This made the numerical analysis of the refined model extremely difficult even on the latest high performance computing platforms. Within each quasistatic time step, a system of nonlinear equations was linearized and solved with a NewtonRaphson (NR) iteration scheme [30, 31] in Abaqus which required several linear solver solutions or global equilibrium iterations. Due to the complexity of this problem (material and geometric nonlinearities, threedimensional problem involving multiple layers, and complex boundary conditions), the direct multifrontal solver in Abaqus/Standard with hybrid parallelization was used. Koric et al. [32] have recently showed that this type of solver has enough scalability and robustness to perform computations on large illconditioned problems on many hundreds of cores. In this approach, its hybrid Message Passing Interface (MPI)/Threaded implementation can take full advantage of large amount of memory and modern multicore processors. It is known that the wall clock time for direct solution of sparse symmetric systems is approximately proportional to the square of the number of unknowns or degrees of freedom (DOFs) [33]. While this is somewhat offset by a more efficient parallel execution on larger domains, it still imposes a severe restriction on the size of the domain that can feasibly be modeled with highly nonlinear quasistatic problems even on the latest supercomputing platforms. Whereas the coarse mesh size takes 7 hours on 6 computational nodes (120 CPU cores), the refined case would require more than two weeks of dedicated supercomputer time on 15 computational nodes (300 CPU cores).
We used the high performance computing (HPC) cluster called iForge [34]. The iForge computer at the National Center for Supercomputer Applications at the University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign is specifically built and tuned to accelerate some of the toughest industrial HPC workflows. The current configuration consists of 144 dual socket Dell PowerEdge M620 nodes, each with two Intel Xeon E7 4890v2 CPUs (Ivy Bridge) and 20 cores operating at 2.8 GHz and 256 GB of RAM. They are connected with QDR Infiniband networking fabric.
3.4.1. Initial Thermomechanical Simulations
The geometry used for simulations of residual stresses and indentation consisted of a rectangular block of dimensions 10 μm × 10 μm × 5.6 μm. Alternating layers of NiAl and Cr, 0.8 μm and 0.4 μm thick, respectively, were modeled by partitioning the block into parallel layers, as shown in Figure 5. Layers were assumed to be perfectly bonded to each other with no possibility of delamination. The domain was meshed using cubic elements of size 0.1 μm (Figure 5).
Layers were assumed to have cubic symmetry to match the experimental results and were given different anisotropic elastic properties, shown in Table 1. The zdirection in simulations corresponded to the direction for both crystal layers and it was also the direction of growth. The ydirection, which is the normal to the probed surface, was oriented along the direction. Local coordinate system was defined accordingly to provide direction specific elastic constants.

Thermal expansion coefficients were assumed to be constant over the temperature range used for simulations. Elastic moduli and thermal expansion coefficients are given in Table 1. The zsymmetry boundary conditions were applied to the model as the block was cooled down from 1400°C to 0°C.
Strains in the direction of crystal growth (along the axis) were the focus of the analysis. It was observed that NiAl lamellae were under forward compressive stresses whereas Cr lamellae were under tensile back stress (Figure 6). Away from the boundaries, strains in both the layers were fairly uniform, giving a value of 0.19% in NiAl and −0.047% in Cr. The strains were visualized on the plane of symmetry of the model.
Xray diffraction studies have suggested strain values of 0.1% and −0.025% in NiAl and Cr, respectively. It was observed that cooling the model in simulations from 700°C to 0°C yielded strain values very close to the experimental values.
3.4.2. Thermal Simulation Followed by Indentation
From initial simulations, it was established that, to obtain the residual strain state of NiAlCr, the finite element model should be run assuming cooling down by about 700°C. Then, a second simulation which included thermal and indentation steps was conducted. Residual thermal strains were generated by cooling the model by 700°C, followed by indentation.
In the simulations, the geometry consisted of two parts: composite cubic block with edge length 12 μm and indenter of radius 100 μm. Composite block had similar properties as adopted in the earlier model. Only a quarter of the block and indenter were modeled and symmetric boundary conditions were imposed (Figure 7). Direction of the growth or the zdirection corresponds to orientation for both crystals. Simulations were performed for the two distinct orientations of the indentation direction: (1) The normal to the surface on which indentation was performed (ydirection) was oriented along the direction; (2) the indentation was performed along the direction coinciding with the growth direction. The same elastic constants were adopted for the model as in the previous simulation and a constant yield stress of 200 MPa was used for both materials to denote the unset of plastic deformation.
In the thermal step, the model was cooled down from 700°C to 0°C, followed by an indentation step, in which the indenter was pushed into the block by 1 μm at a constant velocity, followed by retraction of indenter at the same velocity.
As stated before, two different element sizes were used for meshing, 0.1 μm and 0.2 μm, and results were analyzed. It was observed at the end of the thermal step as well as at 10% of the indentation step that the coarser mesh resulted in very similar strain results as the finer mesh. Thus, the problem was fully solved with a coarser mesh. The coarser mesh was used for further simulations.
3.5. Comparison between the Simulations and Experimental Results
In the 3D simulations during loading, the crystal under indent within the half of the contact radius yields first and the plastic zone increases with applied load. Resulting elastic stress field in the simulations has an arclike shape centered near the contact center. After unloading in the simulations, the plastically deformed material in the area affected by indentation tends to preserve its shape in the simulations, while the surrounding elastic material springs back and transmits compressive stress into the plastic zone. However, in contrast to the indentation of the single phase materials, the residual asgrown stresses, which are already present in the bulk of the composite material, overlap with the indentationinduced stresses and are partitioned between the two phases of the composite material. As a result, after simulation of cooling and indentation of the composite, it was observed that the NiAl and Cr lamellae were in different stress states than those before indentation. The NiAl lamellae were under forward compressive stresses along the direction of growth whereas the Cr lamellae were under backward tensile stresses in agreement with the experiment; compare Figure 8(a) to Figure 4(a). Moreover, the 3D simulation of indentation along different crystallographic directions shows difference in the amplitude of the indentationinduced strains in both phases. For a better comparison between the simulated and experimental results, the strain distribution along the specific lines was extracted from the simulations and compared to the experimental strain distribution along the same lines.
(a)
(b)
Figure 9 shows the positions of the two lines (1 and 2) in the simulated model corresponding to the experimentally measured intensities along the similar lines shown in Figure 4. Because of the large volume needed for simulations, only a quarter of the indented volume was simulated assuming that strains around the spherical indent are symmetric. To obtain strains along the line starting at the very center of the indented area, line 1 was chosen. To obtain strains along the line starting 10 μm from the indented center, the strains were calculated along line 2. The simulated depthdependent strains along these lines, 1 and 2, are shown in Figures 10 and 11. The strains in both lamellae kinds were calculated for indented (deformed) and not indented (undeformed) states. The ratio was calculated using the undeformed state as a reference for each state. Near the surface for line 1, the simulated strains demonstrate the change in the strain sign for both phases (Figure 10). For Cr lamellae near the surface, the strains are positive and then turn to negative at the depth of approximately 3 μm. For NiAl, the strain dependence on depth is more complicated. For line 1, the strains are negative near the surface; then, they turn to positive at the short distance in depth and then turn negative again. For line 2, the simulated strains are negative in NiAl and positive in Cr lamellae near the surface (Figure 11). These trends confirm the experimentally observed results (Figure 4). The strain ratio calculated for strain values of the indented (deformed) relative to the initial undeformed state at the same depth was calculated for both lines (Figures 10 and 11). The simulated results unambiguously show that near the surface in the most deformed area the strain ratio for NiAl and Cr demonstrates distinct trends as those observed experimentally (Figure 4).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
(b)
(c)
4. Conclusions
We find that in the NiAl/Cr(Mo) nanocomposite the indentationinduced strain partitioning between the individual lamellae results in alternating tensile/compressive strains in the submicronsize Cr and NiAl lamellae. 3D simulations confirm the experimentally observed alternating tensile/compression strains in the neighboring Cr and NiAl lamellae. Formation of these regions can be understood as a result of the compatibly constrained lamellae deformations and load partitioning through the interfaces between the harder and softer parts of the composite. These results provide new insights into the strain partitioning and the role of interfaces in this nanocomposite.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
Research was sponsored by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UTBattelle, LLC, for the US Department of Energy, and the funding from the NSF I/UCRC (IIP1362146) grant. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract no. DEAC0206CH11357. Data was collected on beamline 34IDE at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. The authors would also like to thank the Private Sector Program at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) for its computational and software resources. The authors thank H. Bei (ORNL) for sample preparation.
References
 C. Dietrich, M. H. Poech, H. F. Fischmeister, and S. Schmauder, “Stress and strain partitioning in a AgNi fibre composite under transverse loading Finite element modelling and experimental study,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 195–202, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Wang, R. G. Hoagland, and A. Misra, “Mechanics of nanoscale metallic multilayers: from atomicscale to microscale,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 1067–1072, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Dannemann, N. S. Stoloff, and D. J. Duquette, “High temperature fatigue of three nickelbase eutectic composites,” Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 95, pp. 63–71, 1987. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Needleman, “Computational mechanics at the mesoscale,” Acta Materialia, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 105–124, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Frommeyer and R. Rablbauer, “High temperature materials based on the intermetallic compound NiAI reinforced by refractory metals for advanced energy conversion technologies,” Steel Research International, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 507–512, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. W. Hutchinson and A. G. Evans, “Mechanics of materials: topdown approaches to fracture,” Acta Materialia, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 125–135, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. G. Evans, “Design and life prediction issues for hightemperature engineering ceramics and their composites,” Acta Materialia, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 23–40, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Li, Z. Zhang, R. Vogt, J. M. Schoenung, and E. J. Lavernia, “Boundaries and interfaces in ultrafine grain composites,” Acta Materialia, vol. 59, no. 19, pp. 7206–7218, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. J. Beyerlein, N. A. Mara, D. Bhattacharyya, D. J. Alexander, and C. T. Necker, “Texture evolution via combined slip and deformation twinning in rolled silvercopper cast eutectic nanocomposite,” International Journal of Plasticity, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 121–146, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Yu, H. Bei, Y. Chen, E. P. George, and K. An, “Phasespecific deformation behavior of a relatively tough NiAl–Cr(Mo) lamellar composite,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 8485, pp. 59–62, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. I. Barabash, W. Liu, J. Z. Tischler, H. Bei, and J. D. Budai, “Phasespecific elastic/plastic interface interactions in layered NiAl–Cr(Mo) structures,” Acta Materialia, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 3279–3286, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. I. Barabash, H. Bei, Y. F. Gao, and G. E. Ice, “Interface strength in NiAlMo composites from 3D Xray microdiffraction,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 900–903, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Frommeyer, R. Rablbauer, and H. J. Schäfer, “Elastic properties of B2ordered NiAl and NiAl–X (Cr, Mo, W) alloys,” Intermetallics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 299–305, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Bei, E. P. George, and G. M. Pharr, “Smallscale mechanical behavior of intermetallics and their composites,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 483484, no. 12, pp. 218–222, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. M. Tartaglia and N. S. Stoloff, “Fatigue of NiAlMo aligned eutectics at elevated temperatures,” Metallurgical Transactions A, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1891–1898, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Rablbauer, G. Frommeyer, and F. Stein, “Determination of the constitution of the quasi–binary eutectic NiAl–Re system by DTA and microstructural investigations,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 343, no. 12, pp. 301–307, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. T. Guo, K. W. Huai, Q. Gao, W. L. Ren, and G. S. Li, “Effects of rare earth elements on the microstructure and mechanical properties of NiAlbased eutectic alloy,” Intermetallics, vol. 15, no. 56, pp. 727–733, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L.Z. Tang, Z.G. Zhang, S.S. Li, and S.K. Gong, “Mechanical behaviors of NiAlCr(Mo)based near eutectic alloy with Ti, Hf, Nb and W additions,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 212–216, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Y. Sheng, W. Zhang, J. T. Guo, L. Z. Zhou, and H. Q. Ye, “Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties' improvement of NiAl–Cr(Mo)–Hf eutectic alloy during suction casting and subsequent HIP treatment,” Intermetallics, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1115–1119, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Y. Sheng, Y. Xie, T. F. Xi, J. T. Guo, Y. F. Zheng, and H. Q. Ye, “Microstructure characteristics and compressive properties of NiAlbased multiphase alloy during heat treatments,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 528, no. 2930, pp. 8324–8331, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Huai, J. Guo, Z. Ren, Q. Gao, and R. Yang, “Effect of Nb on the microstructure and mechanical properties of cast NiAlCr(Mo) eutectic alloy,” Journal of Materials Science and Technology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 164–168, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 J.M. Yang, S. M. Jeng, K. Bain, and R. A. Amato, “Microstructure and mechanical behavior of insitu directional solidified NiAl/Cr(Mo) eutectic composite,” Acta Materialia, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 295–305, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. I. Barabash and G. E. Ice, Eds., Strain and Dislocation Gradients from Diffraction, Imperial College Press, London, UK, 1st edition, 2014.
 R. Barabash, G. E. Ice, B. C. Larson, G. M. Pharr, K.S. Chung, and W. Yang, “White microbeam diffraction from distorted crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 749–751, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Yang, B. C. Larson, G. E. Ice et al., “Spatially resolved poisson strain and anticlastic curvature measurements in Si under large deflection bending,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82, no. 22, pp. 3856–3858, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. E. Ice, J. D. Budai, and J. W. L. Pang, “The race to Xray microbeam and nanobeam science,” Science, vol. 334, no. 6060, pp. 1234–1239, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Wang, R. Barabash, T. Bieler, W. Liu, and P. Eisenlohr, “Study of {112 1} twinning in αTi by EBSD and laue microdiffraction,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 3664–3674, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. I. Barabash, O. M. Barabash, M. Ojima et al., “Interphase strain gradients in multilayered steel composite from microdiffraction,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 98–108, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Abaqus, Abaqus/Standard Analysis User's Manual, Version 6.13, 2013.
 S. Koric and B. G. Thomas, “Efficient thermomechanical model for solidification processes,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 1955–1989, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH
 C. Zienkiewicz and L. T. Taylor, The Finite Element Method for Fluid Dynamics, ButterworthHeinemann, Boston, Mass, USA; Elsevier, Burlington, Mass, USA, 6th edition, 2005.
 S. Koric, Q. Lu, and E. Guleryuz, “Evaluation of massively parallel linear sparse solvers on unstructured finite element meshes,” Computers and Structures, vol. 141, pp. 19–25, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Fish and T. Belytschko, A First Course in Finite Elements, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  MathSciNet
 iForge, iForgeNCSA's Exclusive Industrial HPC Resource, 2013, http://www.ncsa.illinois.edu/News/12/0709NCSAiForge.html.
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 R. I. Barabash et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.