Research Article

Metabolic Syndrome in Iranian Youths: A Population-Based Study on Junior and High Schools Students in Rural and Urban Areas

Table 1

Prevalence of different components of metabolic syndrome in high school students based on urbanization and intervention, reference area.

High schoolGirlsBoys
UrbanRural valueUrbanRural value

Number of participants
 Intervention1962720223
 Reference1718416684
High BP
 Intervention19 (9.8)00.14 32 (15.9)1 (4.3)0.21
 Reference50 (29.4)14 (17.9)0.05535 (21.1)19 (22.9)0.74
High TG IDF
 Intervention12 (6.2)5 (18.5)0.04 26 (13.0)00.08
 Reference7 (4.8)5 (6.0)0.76 11 (6.6)20 (23.8)<0.001
High TG de Ferranti
 Intervention74 (37.9)14 (51.9)0.1778 (39.0)3 (13.6)0.019
 Reference52 (35.9)39 (46.4)0.1157 (34.3)61 (72.6)<0.001
Low HDL
 Intervention46 (23.6)9 (36.0)0.1861 (30.5)6 (30.0)0.96
 Reference31 (21.4)16 (19.0)0.6749 (29.5)31 (36.9)0.24
High FBS
 Intervention10 (5.1)3 (11.1)0.198 26 (13.0)1 (4.5)0.49
 Reference1 (0.7)1 (1.2)1.00 1 (0.6)01.0
High WC de Ferranti
 Intervention40 (20.6)8 (29.6)0.2964 (32.2)00.001
 Reference29 (17.1)15 (18.3)0.8141 (25.0)3 (3.6)<0.001
High WC IDF
 Intervention18 (9.3)4 (14.8)0.32 33 (16.6)00.03
 Reference10 (5.9)3 (3.7)0.55 16 (9.8)00.003
Metabolic syndrome (IDF)
 Intervention7 (3.6)0 (0)0.620 (10.1)0 (0)0.23
 Reference3 (2.1)1 (1.2)1.04 (2.4)4 (4.8)0.45
Metabolic syndrome (de Ferranti)
 Intervention22 (11.3)3 (11.1)1.038 (19.1)0 (0)0.017
 Reference19 (13.0)8 (9.5)0.4314 (8.4)9 (10.7)0.56

Data are expressed as number (%).
value obtained from Chi-square test or if required.