Timed Bromocriptine-QR Therapy Reduces Progression of Cardiovascular Disease and Dysglycemia in Subjects with Well-Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Table 3
Effect of bromocriptine-QR versus placebo on odds of losing glycemic control (HbA1C going above 7.0) and odds of requiring intensification of concomitant diabetes treatment regimen to maintain HbA1C ≤7.0.
ITT: last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis
Week 52 completer analysis
Effect of B-QR versus placebo on odds of losing good glycemic control (HbA1c exceeding 7.0) at study completion
Study Group
% subjects with HbA1c exceeding 7.0
Odds Ratioa (CI), value
% Subjects with HbA1c exceeding 7.0
Odds Ratioa (CI), value
Placebo
B-QR
Placebo
B-QR
All subjectsb (baseline HbA1C ≤7.0)
24.7
15.2
0.505 (0.390, 0.653),
28.5
21.1
0.632 (0.471, 0.849),
B-QR versus P Δ = −38.5%
B-QR versus P Δ = −26.0%
Subset of all subjects with no change in concomitant diabetes regimen during the study periodc
22.1
13.2
0.469 (0.341, 0.644),
25.6
17.7
0.558 (0.389, 0.800),
B-QR versus P Δ = −40.3%
B-QR versus P Δ = −30.9%
Effect of B-QR versus placebo on odds of requiring intensification of concomitant diabetes treatment regimen to maintain HbA1C ≤7.0
Study Group
% Subjects intensifying regimen
Odds Ratio (CI), value
% Subjects intensifying regimen
Odds Ratio (CI), value
Placebo
B-QR
Placebo
B-QR
Subset of all subjects that stayed in good glycemic control (HbA1c ≤ 7) during the study periodd