Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Diabetes Research
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1702454, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1702454
Research Article

Optimal Revascularization Strategy on Medina 0,1,0 Left Main Bifurcation Lesions in Type 2 Diabetes

1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
2Soft Matter and Interdisciplinary Research Center, College of Physics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China

Received 6 December 2015; Accepted 18 February 2016

Academic Editor: Hiroshi Okamoto

Copyright © 2016 Xuwei Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Kornowski, “The complexity of stenting in bifurcation coronary lesions,” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 696–697, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. F. Lassen, N. R. Holm, G. Stankovic et al., “Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings,” EuroIntervention, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 545–560, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Zimarino, A. Corazzini, F. Ricci, M. Di Nicola, and R. De Caterina, “Late Thrombosis after double versus single drug-eluting stent in the treatment of coronary bifurcations: a meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies,” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 687–695, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Maeng, N. R. Holm, A. Erglis et al., “Long-term results after simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: nordic bifurcation study 5-year follow-up results,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 30–34, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. B. Song, J.-Y. Hahn, J. H. Yang et al., “Differential prognostic impact of treatment strategy among patients with left main versus non-left main bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II,” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 256–263, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H.-M. Lee, C.-W. Nam, Y.-K. Cho et al., “Long-term outcomes of simple crossover stenting from the left main to the left anterior descending coronary artery,” Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 597–602, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Karrowni, N. Makki, A. S. Dhaliwal et al., “Single versus double stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 229–233, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Capranzano, A. Sanfilippo, F. Tagliareni et al., “Long-term outcomes after drug-eluting stent for the treatment of ostial left anterior descending coronary artery lesions,” American Heart Journal, vol. 160, no. 5, pp. 973–978, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Burzotta, G. P. Talarico, C. Trani et al., “Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography findings in patients with bifurcated lesions undergoing provisional stenting,” European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 547–555, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Watanabe, S. Uemura, Y. Sugawara et al., “Side branch complication after a single-stent crossover technique: prediction with frequency domain optical coherence tomography,” Coronary Artery Disease, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 321–329, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. G. Katritsis, A. Theodorakakos, I. Pantos, M. Gavaises, N. Karcanias, and E. P. Efstathopoulos, “Flow patterns at stented coronary bifurcations: computational fluid dynamics analysis,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 530–539, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Y. Chen, I. D. Moussa, C. Davidson, and G. S. Kassab, “Impact of main branch stenting on endothelial shear stress: role of side branch diameter, angle and lesion,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 9, no. 71, pp. 1187–1193, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Wang, J. Liu, X. Zheng et al., “Three-dimensional virtual surgery models for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization strategies,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, Article ID 10945, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. G. Finet, M. Gilard, B. Perrenot et al., “Fractal geometry of arterial coronary bifurcations: a quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound analysis,” EuroIntervention, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 490–498, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. X. He and D. N. Ku, “Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 74–82, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. C. Campbell, L. H. Timmins, D. P. Giddens et al., “Computational fluid dynamics simulations of hemodynamics in plaque erosion,” Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 464–473, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. M. Malek, S. L. Alper, and S. Izumo, “Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 282, no. 21, pp. 2035–2042, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Cheng, D. Tempel, R. van Haperen et al., “Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress,” Circulation, vol. 113, no. 23, pp. 2744–2753, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y.-S. Koh, P.-J. Kim, K. Chang et al., “Long-term clinical outcomes of the one-stent technique versus the two-stent technique for non-left main true coronary bifurcation disease in the era of drug-eluting stents,” Journal of Interventional Cardiology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 245–253, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. J. Gil, D. Vassilev, R. Formuszewicz, T. Rusicka-Piekarz, and A. Doganov, “The carina angle—new geometrical parameter associated with periprocedural side branch compromise and the long-term results in coronary bifurcation lesions with main vessel stenting only,” Journal of Interventional Cardiology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. E1–E10, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. C. Chaudhry, K. P. Dauerman, C. L. Sarnoski, C. S. Thomas, and H. L. Dauerman, “Percutaneous coronary intervention for major bifurcation lesions using the simple approach: risk of myocardial infarction,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S.-J. Kang, J.-M. Ahn, W.-J. Kim et al., “Functional and morphological assessment of side branch after left main coronary artery bifurcation stenting with cross-over technique,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 545–552, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Biondi-Zoccai, I. Sheiban, S. De Servi, C. Tamburino, G. Sangiorgi, and E. Romagnoli, “To kiss or not to kiss? Impact of final kissing-balloon inflation on early and long-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions,” Heart and Vessels, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 732–742, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Yamawaki, T. Muramatsu, K. Kozuma et al., “Long-term clinical outcome of a single stent approach with and without a final kissing balloon technique for coronary bifurcation,” Circulation Journal, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 110–121, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. A. R. Williams, B.-K. Koo, T. J. Gundert, P. J. Fitzgerald, and J. F. LaDisa Jr., “Local hemodynamic changes caused by main branch stent implantation and subsequent virtual side branch balloon angioplasty in a representative coronary bifurcation,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 532–540, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Vassilev and R. J. Gil, “Relative dependence of diameters of branches in coronary bifurcations after stent implantation in main vessel—importance of carina position,” Kardiologia Polska, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 371–378, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Xiu, S.-Y. Choi, G. S. Mintz et al., “Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound evaluation of carina and plaque shift at the distal left main coronary artery bifurcation after treatment with a one-stent cross-over technique,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 1142–1149, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Xiu, W. Liao, B. Liu et al., “Mechanism of lumen loss of the left circumflex ostium after main vessel stent implantation: observations by intravascular ultrasound,” Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1045–1048, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. A. Dishmon, A. Elhaddi, K. Packard, V. Gupta, and T. A. Fischell, “High incidence of inaccurate stent placement in the treatment of coronary aorto-ostial disease,” Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 322–326, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. Jaffe, D. A. Halon, A. Shiran, and R. Rubinshtein, “Percutaneous treatment of aorto-ostial coronary lesions: current challenges and future directions,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 186, pp. 61–66, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. J. H. Yang, Y. B. Song, P. S. Song et al., “Impact of coronary bifurcation angle on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in real-world practice: results from the COBIS registry,” Cardiology, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 216–224, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. Zhang, B. Xu, D. Yin et al., “How bifurcation angle impacts the fate of side branch after main vessel stenting: a retrospective analysis of 1,200 consecutive bifurcation lesions in a single center,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 85, supplement 1, pp. 706–715, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. A. V. Finn, G. Nakazawa, M. Joner et al., “Vascular responses to drug eluting stents: importance of delayed healing,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1500–1510, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. Guagliumi, V. Sirbu, G. Musumeci et al., “Examination of the in vivo mechanisms of late drug-eluting stent thrombosis: findings from optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound imaging,” JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. Girasis, V. Farooq, R. Diletti et al., “Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery),” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1250–1260, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus