Review Article
Prevalence of Oral Mucosal Disorders in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Compared with a Control Group
Table 3
JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for studies reporting prevalence data.
| | Guggenheimer et al., 2000 [20] | Saini et al., 2010 [21] | Bastos et al., 2011 [22] | Mohsin et al., 2014 [23] |
| (1) Was the sample representative of the target population? | Y | Y | Y | U | (2) Were study participants recruited in an appropriate way? | U | U | U | U | (3) Was the sample size adequate? | U | Y | U | Y | (4) Were the study subjects and setting described in detail? | U | U | U | U | (5) Is the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample? | U | U | U | U | (6) Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | U | U | N | N | (7) Was the condition measured reliably? | U | U | U | U | (8) Was there appropriate statistical analysis? | Y | Y | Y | Y | (9) Are all the important confounding factors/subgroups/differences identified and accounted for? | N | N | N | N | (10) Were subpopulation identified using objective criteria? | U | Y | Y | U | Total number of “Y” | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | Quality assessment | low | low | low | low |
|
|
Y: yes; N: no; U: unclear; N/A: not applicable.
|