Research Article

Synergistic Effect of the MTHFR C677T and EPHX2 G860A Polymorphism on the Increased Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Chinese Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Table 3

Odds ratios and 95% confidence interval for ischemic stroke under three genetic models.

Genetic modelsUnadjustedAdjustedAdjusted
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)

MTHFRAdditive1.39 (1.10–1.74).0051.40 (1.11–1.77).0051.42 (1.11–1.81).004
Dominant1.62 (1.06–2.48).0271.60 (1.04–2.48).0331.62 (1.04–2.52).034
Recessive1.51 (1.07–2.11).0171.56 (1.10–2.20).0121.60 (1.12–2.29).01
CT versus CC1.42 (0.90–2.23).1351.38 (0.87–2.20).1731.37 (0.86–2.21).189
TT versus CC1.93 (1.20–3.10).0061.96 (1.21–3.17).0062.00 (1.22–3.29).006
EPHX2Additive0.75 (0.55–0.95).020.72 (0.54–0.95).020.72 (0.55–0.97).031
Dominant0.67 (0.48–0.93).0160.65 (0.47–0.91).0120.67 (0.48–0.95).023
Recessive0.72 (0.36–1.45).360.75 (0.37–1.52).4180.74 (0.36–1.56).432
GA versus GG0.68 (0.48–0.95).0250.65 (0.46–0.93).0180.68 (0.47–0.97).033
AA versus GG0.62 (0.30–1.26).1820.63 (0.31–1.30).210.64 (0.30–1.35).239

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Adjusted for age and sex.
Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, history of hypertension, TC, TG, and HDL-C.