Review Article

Efficacy of Intermittent or Continuous Very Low-Energy Diets in Overweight and Obese Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

Table 4

The GRADE evidence of VLEDs compared to bariatric surgery for overweight and obese people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Quality assessmentNo. of patientsEffectQualityImportance
No. of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsVLEDBariatric surgeryRelative (95% CI)Absolute

Weight
 4Randomized trialsSerious1No serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessSerious2None4242MD -3.14 lower (-10.04 lower to 3.67 higher)Low9
Glucose (better indicated by lower values)
 5Randomized trialsSerious1No serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessSerious2None6955MD 0.37 higher (-0.22 lower to 0.96 higher)Low8
TG (better indicated by lower values)
 4Randomized trialsSerious1No serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessSerious2None5740MD -0.04 lower (-0.25 lower to 0.17 higher)Low7
HOMA-IR (better indicated by lower values)
 4Observational studies3No serious risk of biasSerious4No serious indirectnessSerious2None60Very low6
46MD -1 lower (-2.7 lower to 0.7 higher)

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio. GRADE Working Group grades of evidence: high quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect; moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate; low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate; very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate. 1Some studies were nonrandomized controlled trials. 2The ratio of 95% CI to the effect is more than 50%. 95% CI is wider and its accuracy is poor, so it decreases one level. 3Case-control. 4The value of the combined results is larger, and there is statistical heterogeneity, so it falls by one grade.