Review Article

The Role of Recombinant Proteins and Growth Factors in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Table 10

Other growth factor and recombinant proteins: outcomes of RCTs.

RefType of growth factorWound closureMean time to heal in treatment groupsMechanism mentioned as complete healingConfoundersFurther outcomes
Granulation tissueReepithelializationSexBaseline HbA1cWound sizeOffloadingRecurrence rateAmputation rate

[29]Topical rhVEGF (telbermin)A positive however nonsignificant trend towards healing in the treated group32.5-43 daysNMNMNMNMNMNM27% in the VEGF group versus 33% in the placebo groupNM
[30]Erythropoietin, epoetin betaNo significant results. 26.7% of patients receiving EPO achieved complete wound closure within 12 weeks, whereas only 14.3% in the placebo control arm44 daysNMNMNMNMNMNMNMNM
[31]Talactoferrin gelThe active arms showed a trend toward improvement over placebo () 33% complete healing after 30 days in the active group versus 19% in the placebo group30 daysNMNMNMNMNMNMNMNM
[32]Chrysalin® (TP508 or rusalatide)More than doubled the incidence of complete healing (), increased the mean closure rate 80% (), and decreased the median time to 100% closure by 40% ().80 days to 100% closure in 10 μg Chrysalin®YYNMNMNMNMNM1 in 1 μg Chrysalin®
[33]TGF beta2Proportion of patients with wound closure increased in TGF-β2 at doses of 0.05 μg/cm2 () and 0.5 μg/cm2 () and group with standardized care treatment (). In total, the mean time to complete wound closure was shorter in TGF-β 0.5 μg/cm2 () compared with the placebo group13 weeks in high-dose TGF betaNMNMNNY(-)NMNMNM

VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; TGF-β: transforming growth factor β; Y: yes; N: no; NM: not mentioned.