S1P Signaling Pathways in Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes

He, Qiong; Bo, Jiaqi; Shen, Ruihua; Li, Yan; Zhang, Yi; Zhang, Jiaxin; Yang, Jing; Liu, Yunfeng

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1341750

Journal of Diabetes Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 1341750 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1341750

S1P Signaling Pathways in Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes

Qiong He,¹Jiaqi Bo,²Ruihua Shen,²Yan Li,²Yi Zhang,^3,4Jiaxin Zhang,¹Jing Yang,¹and Yunfeng Liu¹

Academic Editor: Eusebio Chiefari

Received21 Jun 2020

Revised24 Dec 2020

Accepted04 Jan 2021

Published19 Jan 2021

Abstract

The pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is very complicated. The currently well-accepted etiology is the “Ominous Octet” theory proposed by Professor Defronzo. Since presently used drugs for T2DM have limitations and harmful side effects, studies regarding alternative treatments are being conducted. Analyzing the pharmacological mechanism of biomolecules in view of pathogenesis is an effective way to assess new drugs. Sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P), an endogenous lipid substance in the human body, has attracted increasing attention in the T2DM research field. This article reviews recent study updates of S1P, summarizing its effects on T2DM with respect to pathogenesis, promoting β cell proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis, reducing insulin resistance, protecting the liver and pancreas from lipotoxic damage, improving intestinal incretin effects, lowering basal glucagon levels, etc. With increasing research, S1P may help treat and prevent T2DM in the future.

1. Introduction

Approximately 9% of adults have diabetes worldwide, and approximately 90% of patients with diabetes have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [1]. T2DM is a chronic disease that seriously endangers human health; thus, it is imperative to improve our understanding of T2DM.

The pathogenesis of T2DM is complex. One of the most acceptable pathogeneses of T2DM is the “Ominous Octet” theory proposed by Professor Defronzo [2] (Figure 1). “Ominous Octet” is a supplement to the previous “Triumvirate” diabetes pathogenesis theory. The updated theory states that the mechanism of T2DM can be provided in the following eight aspects: (1) defects in islet β cell secretion, including endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation, together lead to islet β cell failure [3]; (2) decreased glucose uptake in muscle tissue: a high-sugar and high-fat environment destroys the insulin signaling pathway in muscle tissue; thus, glucose uptake is reduced [4, 5]; (3) increased liver glycogen output: hepatic glucose production is enhanced; thus, glucose levels are increased [6]; (4) disturbance of lipid metabolism: excessive free fatty acids mediate insulin resistance in the liver and pancreas [7]; (5) impaired incretin effect: GLP-1 deficiency leads to decreased insulin secretion and increased glucagon secretion [8]; (6) basal glucagon levels are elevated, causing the levels of fasting blood glucose to increase [9]; (7) dysregulation of glucose in the kidneys: the dysfunction of kidney-sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 and other molecules leads to the disordered reabsorption of glucose [10]; (8) neurotransmitter dysfunction: the inhibitory effect of the appetite is weakened and excessive energy intake triggers T2DM [11]. For patients with T2DM, these eight pathogenic factors can exist alone or intertwined, eventually leading to the development of T2DM.

Sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P) is a protective lipid molecule for T2DM. In the central nervous system, S1P suppresses appetite by inhibiting related signal transmission. In peripheral organs, S1P has an effect on resisting inflammation and oxidative stress, delaying the progress of insulin resistance, enhancing GLP-1 secretion and effects, and protecting the kidneys. Based on various studies of S1P in recent years, S1P and its related molecular signaling pathways play a crucial role in the multiple pathogenesis of T2DM. S1P is an emerging research hotspot for the prevention and treatment of T2DM. This review summarizes the physiological and pharmacological effects of S1P in the pathogenesis of T2DM to provide new research ideas for future studies.

2. Overview of S1P

S1P is a lysophospholipid with various biological activities. The synthesis of S1P begins with sphingomyelin and glycosphingolipids, both of which are localized in the lysosome and plasma membrane microregions. Sphingomyelin and glycosphingolipid degrade to form the intermediate product ceramide, ceramide then converts to sphingosine, and sphingosine is finally phosphorylated by sphingosine kinase 1 and 2 to form S1P [12, 13]. When S1P is synthesized, it is decomposed into hexadecenal (Hex) and phosphoethanolamine (PE) by S1P lyase and other specific S1P phosphohydrolases. Hex and PE then enter the biosynthetic pathway of triglyceride [14]. S1P is also dephosphorylated and enters the ceramide synthesis pathway [15].

Ceramide is converted to sphingosine, and sphingosine is phosphorylated to form S1P; conversely, S1P is dephosphorylated and catalyzed by ceramide synthase to form ceramide. The metabolic pathway between ceramide and S1P is called “sphingolipid rheostat” [12]. The synthesis and decomposition of S1P in cells are strictly regulated in time and space [16]. The main targets of intracellular S1P are histone deacetylase, TNF receptor-associated factor 2, and Spns2 transporters [17, 18]. In addition, S1P can be transported to the outside of cells through the ABC/Spns2 transporter to act on the S1P receptor (S1PR). After combination with S1PR1-5, S1P mainly activates ERK, SAPK/JNK, p38-MAPK, and ROCK/Rho signaling pathways to regulate the proliferation of islet β cells, promote insulin secretion, reduce the complications of large vessels, and relieve diabetic nephropathy (see Figure 2 for details).

Extracellular S1P binds to S1PR_1~5 on the cell surface and activates downstream signaling pathways. S1PRs are part of the G protein-coupled receptor family.

S1PR₁ can activate intracellular regulatory protein kinase (ERK) through Gi [19] and inhibit adenylate cyclase [20]. S1PR₂ and S1PR₃ are mainly coupled with Gq to activate phospholipase C (PLC), which induces Ca²⁺ mobilization [21, 22] and vitalizes ERK, c-Jun amino terminal kinase (JNK), p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38-MAPK) [23], and Rho-associated protein kinase/Rho protein (ROCK/Rho) [24]. Activation of these pathways regulates cell growth, differentiation, and proliferation as well as inhibits inflammation and apoptosis. The mechanisms of S1PR₄ and S1PR₅ have not yet been fully clarified (see Table 1 for details).

3. The Role of S1P in the Pathogenesis of T2DM from the View of the Ominous Octet

3.1. S1P Protects β Cell Function

3.1.1. S1P Promotes β Cell Proliferation and Reduces Apoptosis

The decrease in the number of islet β cells is a hallmark of T2DM. Increasing the concentration of S1P or upregulating the expression of S1PR has a hypoglycemic effect by increasing the number of β cells and insulin levels.

FTY720, a S1PR agonist, can effectively promote pancreatic β cell proliferation as well as inhibit its apoptosis in T2DM mice. The S1P signaling pathway promotes proliferation by activating intracellular phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K), regulating cyclin D3 and p57KIP2, and mediating β cell regeneration [25].

In addition, studies regarding islet β cell apoptosis have confirmed that the diabetic mice treated with S1P significantly reduced glucose tolerance level, insulin resistance, and the number of β cell apoptotic cells compared with the untreated group. These results indicated that S1P has a protective effect on β cells. In addition, S1PR₁ and S1PR₂ expression in the S1P treatment group significantly increased, indicating that S1P plays a role in antagonizing β islet cell failure by upregulating S1PRs [26].

3.1.2. S1P Delays β Cell Failure by Improving Mitochondrial Function

Chronic hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia are the main factors leading to β cell energy metabolism damage, which mainly injures the normal function of the mitochondrial membrane, cytochrome c release, and caspase-3 activation, leading to β cell failure [27–29].

The mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR) is a mechanism that maintains mitochondrial homeostasis in an adverse environment. UPR, activated by misfolded or unfolded protein accumulation, upregulates the translation of molecular chaperones and proteases, thereby maintaining protein homeostasis [30]. When UPR occurs, sphingosine kinase activates then catalyzes sphingosine to produce S1P. The newly formed S1P may be involved in the initiation of UPR in the cytoplasm or the assembly of proteins in mitochondria [31]. S1P amplifies the protective function of UPR on β cells under stress conditions, such as hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia.

3.1.3. S1P Antagonizes β Cell Apoptosis

Extracellular S1P can antagonize inflammatory cytokine-induced mitochondrial cytochrome c release and inhibit caspase-3 activity in rat pancreatic islet cells, suggesting that S1P can antagonize inflammatory factor-mediated β cell apoptosis [32].

3.2. S1P Improves the Negative Effects of Insulin Resistance in Muscle

Skeletal muscle is the major organ involved in glucose processing in the body. Impaired glucose transport in the skeletal muscle is an important cause of insulin resistance in T2DM. This defect can be attributed to abnormal insulin signal transduction in the skeletal muscle tissue. Insulin normally binds to insulin receptors on the plasma membrane of skeletal muscle cells, activates the Akt pathway, and improves glycogen synthesis and transport [33]. Ceramide can activate atypical protein kinase ζ (protein phosphatase ζ (PKCζ)), phosphorylate Akt, reduce its affinity with phosphatidylinositol triphosphate, and reduce Akt recruitment to the plasma membrane [34, 35]. The upstream kinase 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) and TORC2 must activate the Akt recruited to the plasma membrane to promote glucose utilization. Ceramide blocks the downward transmission of PDK1 and TORC2 signals and antagonizes the Akt signaling pathway [33]. Ceramide also activates protein phosphatase 2A, an enzyme associated with Akt dephosphorylation [36], which inhibits IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation [37] and attenuates downstream insulin signaling [38, 39]. High glucose levels directly stimulate ceramide catabolism and S1P formation [40], whereas S1P inhibits ceramide’s function by blocking the Akt pathway.

3.2.1. Ceramide Induces Insulin Resistance through Multiple Pathways

Ceramide blocks the Akt pathway, after which the effects of the Akt pathway on promoting glycogen synthesis and glucose transport are also impaired [36]. Ceramide inhibits the activation of insulin receptors. When treated with ceramide, insulin receptor tyrosine phosphorylation is reduced [39], leading to weakening of the insulin signal. Moreover, ceramide inhibits the translocation of glucose transporter protein 4 (GLUT4) to the cell membrane [41].

Furthermore, ceramide damages mitochondria, which leads to impaired glucose and fat utilization. The specific process is as follows: ceramide directly inhibits the electron transport of respiratory chain enzyme complex I and reduces the activity of enzyme complex III [37]. Ceramide increases the permeability of the mitochondrial membrane to form the ceramide channel and promotes ions and protein release [42]. Finally, the structure of mitochondria and the function of the respiratory chain are destroyed, resulting in impaired glucose and lipid utilization [43].

3.2.2. S1P Improves the Negative Effects of Insulin Resistance in Muscle

The effect of S1P on ceramide is reflected in the sphingolipid rheostat, which is the metabolic pathway between ceramide and S1P. As mentioned in the overview [44], S1P can be degraded to ceramide, and ceramide can also generate S1P [12]. Ceramide induces insulin resistance. However, when S1P increases, that is, more ceramide converts to S1P, ceramide’s effect of inducing insulin resistance is weakened. The balance between intracellular ceramide and S1P is essential for the development of cellular insulin resistance.

3.2.3. S1P As a Key Factor Involved in the Function of Adiponectin Reversing Insulin Resistance

Adiponectin activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). The activation of AMPK promotes fatty acid oxidation and decomposition, reducing the level of ceramide [45, 46]. In addition, activated AMPK stimulates GLUT4 translocation and increases glucose transport [47, 48].

When adiponectin and insulin are combined, the tyrosine phosphorylation level of insulin receptors in muscle increases [49], which helps to improve insulin sensitivity. Adiponectin can also act as an autocrine and paracrine factor to inhibit the secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 inflammatory factors as well as chemoattractant protein. Moreover, adiponectin accelerates ceramide degradation and increases S1P concentration independent of the AMPK pathway.

S1P is a key factor in the antiapoptotic effect of adiponectin on pancreatic β cells. In in vitro experiments, adiponectin prevented ceramide accumulation and reduced ceramide-induced apoptosis; however, the addition of sphingosine kinase inhibitors counteracted the antiapoptotic effect. The results showed that adiponectin needs to rely on S1P to achieve its functions [40].

3.3. S1P Inhibits Hepatic Glucose Production

The liver is an important organ for regulating blood glucose concentration, and it is the main function that includes regulating glycogen synthesis and gluconeogenesis. When fasting plasma insulin levels increase by 2.5-3 times, the liver produces excessive glucose to compensate for insulin’s lowering glucose function [2]. Furthermore, lipotoxicity and glycotoxicity can increase hepatic glucose output. For example, pyruvate carboxylase is the rate-limiting enzyme of gluconeogenesis but is overexpressed when lipids accumulate, resulting in high blood glucose [50, 51]. Lipotoxicity and glycotoxicity lead to enhanced gluconeogenesis and increased hepatic glucose output, which causes diabetes.

S1P inhibits hepatic glucose output by activating the Akt pathway. Experimental results have confirmed that sphingosine kinase enhances Akt phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner [52]. Activation of the Akt signaling pathway plays the following roles: first, it increases the level of GLUT2 mRNA in hepatocytes and promotes the expression of GLUT2 in hepatocytes [53]; second, it promotes the expression of GLUT1 and GLUT3; third, phosphorylating phosphofructokinase 2 to promote glycolysis, thereby lowering blood glucose levels.

However, S1P improves UPR to rival cellular stress. The increase in S1P concentration, by knocking out the homologous Spgg1 gene, can improve the ER response and basal insulin secretion of various types of cultured cells [54]. In conclusion, S1P weakens the endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated glucose output in the liver via the Akt pathway [55].

3.4. S1P Withstands the Damage Effects of Lipotoxicity

The prominent role of lipids in organisms is to store energy and function as the main component of cell membranes [56]. When the content of free fatty acids is higher than normal for a prolonged period of time, it damages the functions of important organs, such as the pancreas and liver. This effect is called lipotoxicity [3, 57].

Experiments at the pancreatic cell and tissue levels suggest that S1P maintains the normal activity of β cells and pancreatic tissue in a high-fat environment [32, 58]. Other animal experiments have further confirmed that under high-fat conditions, S1P can mobilize a large amount of insulin secretion and delay the occurrence of diabetes [59]. Feeding sphingosine kinase 1 gene-deficient and wild-type mice a high-fat diet results in sphingosine kinase 1 gene-deficient mice suffering from diabetes, while wild-type mice only show mildly impaired blood glucose regulation. Insulin levels in the circulation of wild-type mice approached three times that of sphingosine kinase 1 gene-deficient mice [59]. More experimental results have revealed that under high-fat conditions, the accumulation of a large number of reactive oxygen species is the main cause of cell damage, and S1P can fight cytotoxic substances produced during oxidative stress and play a protective role [60].

Lipid toxicity damages the normal structure and function of liver cells. Abnormal liver function aggravates the disorder of lipid metabolism, forming a vicious circle, which eventually induces diabetes. In Sphk1 gene-deficient liver cells, the proportion of liver cell death increases with the increase in lipotoxicity. In contrast, liver cells overexpressing the sphingosine kinase 1 gene are protected from lipotoxic damage, which may be related to S1P in reducing JNK phosphorylation and inhibiting the C/EBP homologous protein signaling pathway [61].

3.5. S1P Enhances the Incretin Effect

Incretin is a type of gut-derived hormone secreted by intestinal epithelial endocrine cells, mainly including glucose-dependent insulin-like polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Intestinal endocrine L and K cells secrete GLP-1 and GIP, respectively. After eating, food enters the intestine and stimulates cells to secrete secretin [62].

Oral glucose can stimulate more insulin secretion than intravenous glucose [63], and this effect is called the incretin effect. The incretin effect accounts for 60% of the total insulin release after a meal. When the incretin effect is weakened, insulin release decreases, causing postprandial blood sugar to rise and blood sugar fluctuations to increase, eventually leading to diabetes. GLP-1 and GIP are mainly included in incretin. For the effect on gut secretion of two types of incretin, GLP-1 plays a major role, while the effect of GIP is relatively weak. In patients with T2DM, the physiological function of GLP-1 is not affected. However, a significant reduction in secretion leads to T2DM [64].

S1P increases the secretion of GLP-1 by activating the PLC-PKC signaling pathway. Under normal circumstances, food intake activates the Gq protein-coupled receptor on intestinal L cells, enabling the G protein-PLC-PKC signaling pathway. S1P can activate the PLC pathway in this process, after which PLC catalyzes the hydrolysis of plasma membrane lipid phosphatidylinositol diphosphate to generate 1,4,5-triphosphate inositol (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DG). IP3 and DG, acting as second messengers, increase the Ca²⁺ concentration and activate PKC, respectively. Finally, the secretion of GLP-1 increases [65].

Activating the S1P signaling pathway not only promotes the secretion of GLP-1 but also produces the same biological effects as GLP-1. In pancreatic islet β cells, GLP-1 binds to its receptor to activate adenylate cyclase (AC), increase intracellular cAMP content, and initiate protein kinase A, triggering Ca²⁺ release and releasing insulin [66, 67]. GLP-1 can also improve the survival of islet β cells by activating the PI3K and Akt signaling pathways [68, 69]. S1P can directly activate pathways, such as AC and Akt, and exhibit physiological functions similar to those of GLP-1 [58].

3.6. S1P Inhibits Glucagon

The blood glucose balance is mainly regulated by glucagon and insulin. The high glucagon level causes an increase in blood glucose and increases the secretion of insulin, which increases the burden of islet β cells and causes cell damage and apoptosis. Insulin secretion is reduced after islet β cell damage, which eventually leads to T2DM.

The fasting glucagon level of patients with T2DM can be increased by 50% compared to those of nondiabetic patients [70]. There are two reasons for the increase in basal glucagon levels. One is that the high glucose state cannot inhibit the secretion of glucagon from pancreatic islet α cells so they continue to secrete glucagon [71]. The other is that α cells are not regulated by insulin, that is, insulin resistance exists [72].

S1P promotes the synthesis of GLP-1 by activating the PLC-PKC signaling pathway [65]. That is, S1P enhances the inhibitory effect of GLP-1 on glucagon secretion. Increased GLP-1 production plays an important role in maintaining the reactivity of islet α cells. GLP-1 can indirectly inhibit the secretion of glucagon by promoting the secretion of somatostatin by islet δ cells. GLP-1 can also directly inhibit glucagon secretion by islet α cells [73].

In addition, S1P alleviates insulin resistance in α cells in patients with T2DM. In the pancreatic islet α cells of T2DM patients, the insulin signaling pathways, such as Akt, are blocked, which leads to insulin resistance. When the S1P signaling pathway is activated, the Akt pathway can be activated to weaken insulin resistance [74].

3.7. S1P Improves the Imbalance of Glucose Processing in the Kidneys

The kidneys process glucose through glomerular filtration, proximal tubule reabsorption, and gluconeogenesis, which play an important role in glucose regulation [75]. Renal tubular glucose reabsorption is the most important mechanism for regulating blood glucose homeostasis. After culturing in a high-sugar environment, intracellular sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 mRNA and protein levels are significantly higher than in controls, and the reabsorption of glucose by the kidneys also increases significantly [76].

S1P protects and repairs glomerular and renal tubular cells. High glucose-induced proliferation of mesangial cells and accumulation of the extracellular matrix are the most important pathological changes in the early stage of diabetic kidney injury [77]. Studies have confirmed that S1P can promote glomerular hyperplasia [78]. In the diabetic nephropathy mouse S1PR₁ agonist, the renal tubular epithelial cell barrier and relaxation function are improved; meanwhile, the damaged epithelial cells are impaired, all of which improve kidney microcirculation [79].

Otherwise, S1P reduces the inflammatory response of the kidney and prevents the occurrence of kidney damage under high glucose levels. The lack of S1PR₁ in endothelial cells damages renal blood vessels and increases their permeability. Tubular necrosis, apoptosis, and inflammation are intertwined to exacerbate kidney injury [80, 81]. Therefore, S1P can protect the kidney from injury by reducing inflammation, weakening inflammation, and protecting renal proximal tubule cells [82].

3.8. S1P Regulates Neurotransmitter Function

The hypothalamus is an important center for regulating appetite and controlling glucose balance [83]. Obese individuals are characterized by insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinemia. In obese and insulin-resistant patients, the degree of appetite suppression response decreases after glucose intake, and the time to reach the maximum suppression response is delayed. The patients’ inhibitory effect on appetite in the hypothalamus is significantly weakened. Neurotransmitters, such as neuropeptides, reach the peripheral muscles, fat, and other tissues through body fluid transport to regulate glucose metabolism [84].

Depolarization of nerve cells induces the rapid generation of S1P. It is speculated that the increase in S1P concentration during depolarization may contribute to the release of norepinephrine and the increase of intracellular Ca²⁺ [85]. In addition, S1P is involved in the secretion of glutamate in hippocampal neurons through autocrine or paracrine means; nanomolar S1P causes glutamate secretion in hippocampal neurons, while picomolar S1P increases glutamate secretion. This indicates that S1P promotes neurotransmitter release [86]. Therefore, S1P enhances the function of neurotransmitters in the energy conversion of glucose in the liver, kidneys, muscle, and other organs.

4. Discussion

4.1. The Role of Sphingolipid Rheostat in Regulating T2DM

A possible reason for the contradicting function of S1P may be its relative levels instead of S1P directly determining the direction of cell and tissue metabolism [87]. The relevance of “sphingolipid rheostat” and its role in regulating T2DM have been carried out by numerous research groups using different cell types and experimental manipulations. The sphingolipid metabolites ceramide, sphingosine, and S1P constitute the S1P axis, which plays an important role in various organs, such as the pancreas and blood vessels. These metabolites are interconvertible (Figure 3) but usually have different functions. Active S1P stimulates growth and suppresses apoptosis [88], while ceramide and sphingosine usually inhibit proliferation and promote apoptosis [89–91]. On the onset of diabetes, not only should we pay attention to the impact of S1P but also the concentration of S1P in the circulation as well as the content of other molecules on the S1P axis. The combined effect of these factors is the effect of S1P.

This suggests that in the S1P research field, a specific S1PR agonist or antagonist should be selected to study the effects of S1PR_1-5. If only S1P is used for physiological or pharmacological experiments, it will be activated at the same time, and the effects of different signal pathways will appear superimposed, affecting the authenticity and accuracy of the experimental results. When entering the stage of clinical drug research and development, attention should be paid to the development of selective S1PR ligands to try to avoid the adverse effects of S1PR₁ and S1PR₂.

4.2. Progress of Recent S1P Studies on Diabetes

S1P can directly promote β cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis, indirectly reduce insulin resistance through adiponectin, and protect islets [25, 26, 92]. These findings confirm the beneficial effect of S1P on T2DM and provide a theoretical reference for promoting the application of S1P in clinical treatment. In addition, S1P can reduce mesangial cell inflammation through the SphK1 and S1PR₂ pathways, reduce renal damage, and regulate glucose excretion, indicating that S1P also has a positive effect on the prevention and treatment of T2DM complications.

Studies regarding the S1PR₂ signaling pathway in C2C12 skeletal muscle myoblasts suggest that the roles of S1PR may be diverse and even antagonistic to each other. The activation of S1PR₂ can reduce the activity of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B, a major regulator of insulin receptor signal transduction, thereby promoting glucose uptake in skeletal muscle cells [93] and lowering blood glucose. The S1PR₁ and S1PR₂ signaling pathways may also have an effect on inhibiting glycometabolism and promoting insulin resistance. The SphK1/S1PR₁/STAT3 axis may enhance and amplify insulin resistance [94]. Therefore, the role of S1P is not only beneficial for T2DM, especially in the activation of S1PR₁ and S1PR₂; it may destroy lipogenesis and promote the secretion of cytokines, thereby inhibiting the differentiation of fat cells and insulin signal transduction, inhibiting the proliferation of β cells and inducing their apoptosis. In addition, S1P has antiproliferative properties in rat liver cells by activating S1P2, suggesting that S1P is a negative regulator of liver regeneration. It cannot be excluded that the improvement of S1P-mediated insulin signal transduction is the result of changes in ceramide relative to the rheostat of S1P. Therefore, the role of SIP in hepatic insulin resistance is not yet fully understood [53, 95].

Furthermore, activation of specific S1PRs can inhibit adipose tissue production and promote lipolysis, which means higher free fatty acid concentration and more serious lipotoxicity. Jun et al. found that high concentrations of S1P can induce lipolysis through the cAMP PKA signaling pathway associated with S1PRs in cultured rat white adipocytes [96], which can also induce the downregulation of adipocyte-specific transcription factors, such as PPAR, C/EBP, and adiponectin, thereby ceasing adipogenesis and inhibiting lipid deposition [97]. The decomposition effect of S1P on adipose tissue mainly depends on the activation of S1PR1,2.

Jeong et al. found that in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, adenovirus-mediated S1P2 overexpression can inhibit the JNK pathway and induce the downregulation of PPAR expression [98]. This indicates that the lipolysis of S1P may be mediated by the S1P2 and JNK signaling pathways.

FTY720, a S1PR agonist, inhibits adipogenesis and promotes lipolysis in DIO mice. The lipophilic effect of FTY720 phosphate involves increasing the phosphorylation of Ser563 and transcription of hormone-sensitive lipase, fatty triglyceride lipase, and perilipin [99]. In addition, FTY720 can promote insulin resistance in mature adipocytes and reduce glucose uptake [100].

4.3. Progress of Recent S1P Studies in Other Diseases

In addition to T2DM, recent studies regarding S1P have shown many interesting results in various areas.

FTY720/fingolimod, a functional S1PR1 antagonist, used clinically for nonpain conditions, is being utilized as nonnarcotic analgesics and may hopefully help reduce the abuse of opioids [101].

In March 2020, ozanimod capsules, agonists for S1PR1 and S1PR5, were approved for application in the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis by the US FDA, involving clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease in adults. In addition, CHMP recommended the approval of ozanimod in the EU for the therapy of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with active disease defined by clinical or imaging features in adults. Furthermore, ozanimod has recently been assessed for its curative effect in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, which has been undergoing multinational phase III trials [102].

Olesch et al. [103] found that the ablation of the immune cell-specific receptor S1PR4, which leads to increased CD8+ T cell abundance, delays tumor development and increases treatment success in murine models of breast carcinoma and colitis-associated colorectal cancer.

Regulating SphK, S1P, and S1PR pathways may have significant beneficial effects against acute and chronic life-threatening complications associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection [104].

4.4. Development of S1P-Related Drugs

FTY720 (fingolimod) is the first FDA-approved S1P-related drug. It is an immunomodulatory drug for treating multiple sclerosis that inhibits lymphocyte egress from lymphoid tissues by downregulating S1PR [105]. For FTY720, the main effect may be the internalization and continuous signal transduction of S1P1 [106].

However, S1P-related compounds have not yet been used to treat diabetes. Through the analysis of the role of S1P in the pathogenesis of diabetes, we found that S1P and its related molecules can increase the tissue’s sensitivity to insulin, protect islet β cells, and regulate appetite, thus having the potential to be developed as drugs for T2DM. More importantly, if S1P is used as a drug, it may reduce the side effects caused by compound compatibility because S1P is an endogenous lipid molecule present in the human body.

5. Conclusion

The theory of “Ominous Octet” proposed by Professor Defronzo is a comprehensive conclusion on T2DM pathogenesis, and the role of S1P and its related metabolites in the development of T2DM has attracted increased attention. Therefore, we reviewed the role of S1P in each pathogenesis from the perspective of “Ominous Octet.” Overall, S1P plays an active role in preventing and delaying the development of T2DM.

The effects of S1P on T2DM can be summarized as follows: (1) S1P can promote β cell proliferation and antagonize its apoptosis; (2) S1P antagonizes insulin resistance in muscle tissue; (3) S1P enhances the Akt pathway and promotes hepatic glucose uptake and glycolysis, thereby reducing blood sugar; (4) it protects the liver and pancreas from lipotoxic damage; (5) it improves intestinal incretin effects; (6) it lowers basal glucagon levels; (7) it protects the barrier function of renal tubular epithelial cells and reverses kidney injury; (8) it promotes neurotransmitter release and transport to target organs, such as the liver, kidneys, and muscles to increase glucose utilization.

S1P is involved in multiple mechanisms of T2DM pathogenesis, and the broadness of its effects represents its great value in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of T2DM. However, the safety of S1P-related drugs for humans needs to be further investigated. The mechanisms of S1P and T2DM have not yet been fully elucidated, and further studies are needed both in laboratories and in clinics.

Data Availability

The data supporting this systematic review are from previously reported studies and datasets, which have been cited.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Qiong He and Jiaqi Bo were responsible for data curation. Jing Yang and Yunfeng Liu were responsible for funding acquisition. Yi Zhang and Yunfeng Liu were responsible for supervision. Qiong He, Jiaqi Bo, Ruihua Shen, Yan Li, and Jiaxin Zhang contributed in writing the original draft. Qiong He, Jiaqi Bo, Ruihua Shen, Yan Li, Yi Zhang, Jiaxin Zhang, Jing Yang, and Yunfeng Liu contributed in writing, review, and editing.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81770776 and 82073909), Research Project Supported by Shanxi Scholarship Council of China (2020-172), and Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (No. 201901D111353).

References

Y. Zheng, S. H. Ley, and F. B. Hu, “Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications,” Nature Reviews. Endocrinology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 88–98, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Defronzo, “From the triumvirate to the ominous octet: a new paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 773–795, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Prentki and C. J. Nolan, “Islet cell failure in type 2 diabetes,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116, no. 7, pp. 1802–1812, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bajaj and R. A. Defronzo, “Metabolic and molecular basis of insulin resistance,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 311–323, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Cusi, K. Maezono, A. Osman et al., “Insulin resistance differentially affects the Pi 3-kinase- and map kinase-mediated signaling in human muscle,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 311–320, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Consoli, N. Nurjhan, J. J. Reilly Jr., D. M. Bier, and J. E. Gerich, “Mechanism of increased gluconeogenesis in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Role of alterations in systemic, hepatic, and muscle lactate and alanine metabolism,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 2038–2045, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Roden, T. B. Price, G. Perseghin et al., “Mechanism of free fatty acid-induced insulin resistance in humans,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 2859–2865, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Drucker and M. A. Nauck, “The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes,” Lancet, vol. 368, no. 9548, pp. 1696–1705, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gastaldelli, S. Baldi, M. Pettiti et al., “Influence of obesity and type 2 diabetes on gluconeogenesis and glucose output in humans: a quantitative study,” Diabetes, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1367–1373, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Rahmoune, P. W. Thompson, J. M. Ward, C. D. Smith, G. Hong, and J. Brown, “Glucose transporters in human renal proximal tubular cells isolated from the urine of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 3427–3434, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Matsuda, Y. Liu, S. Mahankali et al., “Altered hypothalamic function in response to glucose ingestion in obese humans,” Diabetes, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1801–1806, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Spiegel and S. Milstien, “Sphingosine-1-phosphate: an enigmatic signalling lipid,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 397–407, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Merrill Jr., “Sphingolipid and glycosphingolipid metabolic pathways in the era of sphingolipidomics,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 6387–6422, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Schulze and K. Sandhoff, “Sphingolipids and lysosomal pathologies,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1841, no. 5, pp. 799–810, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Le Stunff, P. Giussani, M. Maceyka, S. Lepine, S. Milstien, and S. Spiegel, “Recycling of sphingosine is regulated by the concerted actions of sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphohydrolase 1 and sphingosine kinase 2,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 47, pp. 34372–34380, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Le Stunff, S. Milstien, and S. Spiegel, “Generation and metabolism of bioactive sphingosine-1-phosphate,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 882–899, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Alvarez, K. B. Harikumar, N. C. Hait et al., “Sphingosine-1-phosphate is a missing cofactor for the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRAF2,” Nature, vol. 465, no. 7301, pp. 1084–1088, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. C. Hait, J. Allegood, M. Maceyka et al., “Regulation of histone acetylation in the nucleus by sphingosine-1-phosphate,” Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 325, no. 5945, pp. 1254–1257, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Lee, J. R. Van Brocklyn, S. Thangada et al., “Sphingosine-1-phosphate as a ligand for the G protein-coupled receptor Edg-1,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5356, pp. 1552–1555, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Van Brocklyn, M. J. Lee, R. Menzeleev et al., “Dual actions of sphingosine-1-phosphate: extracellular through the Gi-coupled receptor Edg-1 and intracellular to regulate proliferation and survival,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 229–240, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Ancellin and T. Hla, “Differential pharmacological properties and signal transduction of the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors Edg-1, Edg-3, and Edg-5,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 27, pp. 18997–19002, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sato, J. Kon, H. Tomura et al., “Activation of phospholipase C-Ca2+system by sphingosine 1-phosphate in Cho cells transfected with Edg-3, a putative lipid receptor,” FEBS Letters, vol. 443, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Gonda, H. Okamoto, N. Takuwa et al., “The novel sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor Agr16 is coupled via pertussis toxin-sensitive and -insensitive G-proteins to multiple signalling pathways,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 337, no. 1, pp. 67–75, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sanchez, A. Skoura, M. T. Wu, B. Casserly, E. O. Harrington, and T. Hla, “Induction of vascular permeability by the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-2 (S1p2r) and its downstream effectors Rock and Pten,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1312–1318, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhao, J. Choi, C. Zhao, and Z. A. Ma, “FTY720 normalizes hyperglycemia by stimulating β-Cellin VivoRegeneration indb/dbMice through regulation of cyclin D3 and p57KIP2,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 8, pp. 5562–5573, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. He, B. Shi, X. Zhao, and J. Sui, “Sphingosine-1-phosphate induces islet Β-cell proliferation and decreases cell apoptosis in high-fat diet/streptozotocin diabetic mice,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 3415–3424, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
R. P. Robertson, “β-Cell deterioration during diabetes: what's in the gun?” Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 388–393, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Sidarala and A. Kowluru, “The regulatory roles of mitogen-activated protein kinase (Mapk) pathways in health and diabetes: lessons learned from the pancreatic β-Cell,” Recent Patents on Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Drug Discovery, vol. 10, no. 999, p. 1, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. G. Khadija, F. Chen, T. Hadden, R. L. Commissaris, and A. Kowluru, “Biology and regulatory roles of nuclear lamins in cellular function and dysfunction,” Recent Patents on Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Drug Discovery, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Qureshi, C. M. Haynes, and M. W. Pellegrino, “The mitochondrial unfolded protein response: signaling from the powerhouse,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 292, no. 33, pp. 13500–13506, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kurano, K. Tsukamoto, T. Shimizu et al., “Protection against insulin resistance by apolipoprotein M/sphingosine 1-phosphate,” Diabetes, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 867–881, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. G. Laychock, S. M. Sessanna, M. H. Lin, and L. D. Mastrandrea, “Sphingosine 1-phosphate affects cytokine-induced apoptosis in rat pancreatic islet β-cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 147, no. 10, pp. 4705–4712, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lipina and H. S. Hundal, “Sphingolipids: agents provocateurs in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance,” Diabetologia, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1596–1607, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Bandet, S. Tan-Chen, O. Bourron, H. Le Stunff, and E. Hajduch, “Sphingolipid metabolism: new insight into ceramide-induced lipotoxicity in muscle cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 3, p. 479, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Mahfouz, R. Khoury, A. Blachnio-Zabielska et al., “Characterising the inhibitory actions of ceramide upon insulin signaling in different skeletal muscle cell models: a mechanistic insight,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 7, article e101865, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Stratford, K. L. Hoehn, F. Liu, and S. A. Summers, “Regulation of insulin action by ceramide,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 35, pp. 36608–36615, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Di Paola, T. Cocco, and M. Lorusso, “Ceramide interaction with the respiratory chain of heart mitochondria†,” Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 22, pp. 6660–6668, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Hage Hassan, A. C. Pacheco de Sousa, R. Mahfouz et al., “Sustained action of ceramide on the insulin signaling pathway in muscle cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 291, no. 6, pp. 3019–3029, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. MohammadTaghvaei, G. Taheripak, M. Taghikhani, and R. Meshkani, “Palmitate-induced PTP1B expression is mediated by ceramide-JNK and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1964–1970, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. L. Holland, R. A. Miller, Z. V. Wang et al., “Receptor-mediated activation of ceramidase activity initiates the pleiotropic actions of adiponectin,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. JeBailey, O. Wanono, W. Niu, J. Roessler, A. Rudich, and A. Klip, “Ceramide- and oxidant-induced insulin resistance involve loss of insulin-dependent Rac-activation and actin remodeling in muscle cells,” Diabetes, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 394–403, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Colombini, “Ceramide channels and their role in mitochondria-mediated apoptosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1797, no. 6-7, pp. 1239–1244, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. R. Koves, J. R. Ussher, R. C. Noland et al., “Mitochondrial overload and incomplete fatty acid oxidation contribute to skeletal muscle insulin resistance,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. F. Jessup, C. S. Bonder, S. M. Pitson, and P. T. Coates, “The sphingolipid rheostat: a potential target for improving pancreatic islet survival and function,” Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders Drug Targets, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 262–272, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Yadav, M. A. Kataria, V. Saini, and A. Yadav, “Role of leptin and adiponectin in insulin resistance,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 417, pp. 80–84, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Yamauchi, J. Kamon, H. Waki et al., “The fat-derived hormone adiponectin reverses insulin resistance associated with both lipoatrophy and obesity,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 941–946, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. B. Kahn, T. Alquier, D. Carling, and D. G. Hardie, “AMP-activated protein kinase: ancient energy gauge provides clues to modern understanding of metabolism,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Yamauchi, Y. Nio, T. Maki et al., “Targeted disruption of AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 causes abrogation of adiponectin binding and metabolic actions,” Nature Medicine, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 332–339, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Stefan, B. Vozarova, T. Funahashi et al., “Plasma adiponectin concentration is associated with skeletal muscle insulin receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, and low plasma concentration precedes a decrease in whole-body insulin sensitivity in humans,” Diabetes, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1884–1888, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Matsuda, R. A. Defronzo, L. Glass et al., “Glucagon dose-response curve for hepatic glucose production and glucose disposal in type 2 diabetic patients and normal individuals,” Metabolism, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1111–1119, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Bays, L. Mandarino, and R. A. DeFronzo, “Role of the adipocyte, free fatty acids, and ectopic fat in pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor agonists provide a rational therapeutic approach,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 463–478, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Ma, J. L. Chen, G. G. Wang et al., “Sphingosine kinase 1 participates in insulin signalling and regulates glucose metabolism and homeostasis in Kk/Ay diabetic mice,” J Diabetologia, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 891–900.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Osawa, E. Seki, Y. Kodama et al., “Acid sphingomyelinase regulates glucose and lipid metabolism in hepatocytes through AKT activation and AMP‐activated protein kinase suppression,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1133–1144.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lépine, J. C. Allegood, M. Park, P. Dent, S. Milstien, and S. Spiegel, “Sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphohydrolase-1 regulates ER stress-induced autophagy,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 350–361, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-Y. Lee, I.-K. Hong, B.-R. Kim et al., “Activation of sphingosine kinase 2 by endoplasmic reticulum stress ameliorates hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance in mice,” Hepatology, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 135–146.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Cartier and T. Hla, “Sphingosine 1-phosphate: lipid signaling in pathology and therapy,” Science, vol. 366, no. 6463, article eaar5551, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Unger, “Lipotoxicity in the pathogenesis of obesity-dependent NIDDM: genetic and clinical implications,” Diabetes, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 863–870, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Veret, N. Coant, I. A. Gorshkova et al., “Role of palmitate-induced sphingoid base-1-phosphate biosynthesis in INS-1 β-cell survival,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1831, no. 2, pp. 251–262, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Qi, J. Chen, A. Lay, A. Don, M. Vadas, and P. Xia, “Loss of sphingosine kinase 1 predisposes to the onset of diabetes via promoting pancreatic β-cell death in diet-induced obese mice,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 4294–4304, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Botta, Y. Liu, S. Wannaiampikul et al., “An adiponectin-S1p axis protects against lipid induced insulin resistance and cardiomyocyte cell death via reduction of oxidative stress,” Nutrition & Metabolism, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 14, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Qi, W. Wang, J. Chen et al., “Sphingosine kinase 1 protects hepatocytes from lipotoxicity via down-regulation of IRE1α protein expression,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 290, no. 38, pp. 23282–23290, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Nauck and J. J. Meier, “Incretin hormones: their role in health and disease,” Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, vol. 20, Suppl 1, pp. 5–21, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Holst and J. Gromada, “Role of incretin hormones in the regulation of insulin secretion in diabetic and nondiabetic humans,” American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 287, no. 2, pp. E199–E206, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Toft-Nielsen, M. B. Damholt, S. Madsbad et al., “Determinants of the impaired secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 in type 2 diabetic patients,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 3717–3723, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. E. Parker, F. Reimann, and F. M. Gribble, “Molecular mechanisms underlying nutrient-stimulated incretin secretion,” Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, vol. 12, p. e1, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. E. Fridlyand, M. C. Harbeck, M. W. Roe, and L. H. Philipson, “Regulation of camp dynamics by Ca2+ and G protein-coupled receptors in the pancreatic β-cell: a computational approach,” American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology, vol. 293, no. 6, pp. C1924–C1933, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Kang, O. G. Chepurny, and G. G. Holz, “cAMP-regulated guanine nucleotide exchange factor ii (Epac2) mediates Ca2+-induced Ca2+release in Ins-1 pancreatic β-cells,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 536, no. 2, pp. 375–385, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Doyle and J. M. Egan, “Mechanisms of action of glucagon-like peptide 1 in the pancreas,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 546–593, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Miettinen, P. Ormio, E. Hakonen, M. Banerjee, and T. Otonkoski, “EGF receptor in pancreatic β-cell mass regulation,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 280–285, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Brereton, E. Vergari, Q. Zhang, and A. Clark, “Alpha-, delta- and PP-cells,” The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 575–591, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Brand, P. N. Jorgensen, U. Knigge et al., “Role of glucagon in maintenance of euglycemia in fed and fasted rats,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 269, no. 3, pp. E469–E477, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Mohan, Y. Mao, S. Zhang et al., “Differentially expressed microrna-483 confers distinct functions in pancreatic β- and α-cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 290, no. 32, pp. 19955–19966, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. B. Degn, B. Brock, C. B. Juhl et al., “Effect of intravenous infusion of exenatide (synthetic exendin-4) on glucose-dependent insulin secretion and counterregulation during hypoglycemia,” Diabetes, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2397–2403, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. A. Khan, P. B. Goforth, M. Zhang, and L. S. Satin, “Insulin activates Atp-sensitive K+ channels in pancreatic -Cells through a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent pathway,” Diabetes, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 2192–2198, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Alsahli and J. E. Gerich, “Renal glucose metabolism in normal physiological conditions and in diabetes,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 133, pp. 1–9, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Andrianesis and J. Doupis, “The role of kidney in glucose homeostasis--Sglt2 inhibitors, a new approach in diabetes treatment,” Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 519–539, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Ichinose, E. Kawasaki, and K. Eguchi, “Recent advancement of understanding pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes and potential relevance to diabetic nephropathy,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 554–564, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. A. Hannun, C. Luberto, and K. M. Argraves, Biochemistry, pp. 4893–4903, 2001.
S. Bekpinar, G. Yenidunya, F. Gurdol, Y. Unlucerci, E. Aycan-Ustyol, and N. Dinccag, “The effect of nephropathy on plasma sphingosine 1-phosphate concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 48, no. 18, pp. 1264–1267, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. H. Lien, K. C. Yong, C. Cho, S. Igarashi, and L. W. Lai, “S1p1-selective agonist, Sew2871, ameliorates ischemic acute renal failure,” Kidney International, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 1601–1608, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-W. Lai, K.-C. Yong, S. Igarashi, and Y.-H. H. Lien, “A sphingosine-1-phosphate type 1 receptor agonist inhibits the early T-cell transient following renal ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Kidney International, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 1223–1231.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Geoffroy, N. Wiernsperger, M. Lagarde, and S. El Bawab, “Bimodal effect of advanced glycation end products on mesangial cell proliferation is mediated by neutral ceramidase regulation and endogenous sphingolipids,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 33, pp. 34343–34352, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Obici, B. B. Zhang, G. Karkanias, and L. Rossetti, “Hypothalamic insulin signaling is required for inhibition of glucose production,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1376–1382.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Lei, R. N. Bone, T. Ali et al., “Evidence of contribution of Ipla2β-mediated events during islet Β-cell apoptosis due to proinflammatory cytokines suggests a role for Ipla2β in T1d development,” Endocrinology, vol. 155, no. 9, pp. 3352–3364, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Alemany, B. Kleuser, L. Ruwisch et al., “Depolarisation induces rapid and transient formation of intracellular sphingosine-1-phosphate,” FEBS Letters, vol. 509, no. 2, pp. 239–244, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Okada, T. Kajimoto, S. Jahangeer, and S. Nakamura, “Sphingosine kinase/sphingosine 1-phosphate signalling in central nervous system,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 7–13.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Maceyka, S. G. Payne, S. Milstien, and S. Spiegel, “Sphingosine kinase, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and apoptosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1585, no. 2-3, pp. 193–201, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Xia, L. Wang, J. R. Gamble, and M. A. Vadas, “Activation of sphingosine kinase by tumor necrosis factor-α inhibits apoptosis in human endothelial cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 48, pp. 34499–34505, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kolesnick and Y. A. Hannun, “Ceramide and apoptosis,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 224-225, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Mathias, L. A. Pena, and R. N. Kolesnick, “Signal transduction of stress via ceramide,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 335, no. 3, pp. 465–480, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. A. Hannun, C. R. Loomis, A. H. Merrill Jr., and R. M. Bell, “Sphingosine inhibition of protein kinase C activity and of phorbol dibutyrate binding in vitro and in human platelets,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 261, no. 27, pp. 12604–12609, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Lee, H. S. Park, S. H. Hong et al., “4-Deoxypyridoxine improves the viability of isolated pancreatic islets ex vivo,” Islets, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 116–121, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Rapizzi, M. L. Taddei, T. Fiaschi, C. Donati, P. Bruni, and P. Chiarugi, “Sphingosine 1-phosphate increases glucose uptake through trans-activation of insulin receptor,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 66, no. 19, pp. 3207–3218, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liang, M. Nagahashi, E. Y. Kim et al., “Sphingosine-1-phosphate links persistent STAT3 activation, chronic intestinal inflammation, and development of colitis-associated cancer,” Cancer Cell, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 107–120, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fayyaz, L. Japtok, and B. Kleuser, “Divergent role of sphingosine 1-phosphate on insulin resistance,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 134–147, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Jun, J. H. Lee, B. H. Choi et al., “Sphingosine-1-phosphate modulates both lipolysis and leptin production in differentiated rat white adipocytes,” Endocrinology, vol. 147, no. 12, pp. 5835–5844, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Moon, J. K. Jeong, Y. J. Lee, J. W. Seol, and S. Y. Park, “Sphingosine-1-phosphate inhibits the adipogenic differentiation of 3t3-L1 preadipocytes,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1153–1158, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Jeong, M. H. Moon, and S. Y. Park, “Modulation of the expression of sphingosine 1-phosphate 2 receptors regulates the differentiation of pre-adipocytes,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 7496–7502, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Moon, J. K. Jeong, J. H. Lee et al., “Antiobesity activity of a sphingosine 1-phosphate analogue FTY720 observed in adipocytes and obese mouse model,” Experimental & Molecular Medicine, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 603–614, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Beg, A. Srivastava, K. Shankar et al., “PPP2R5B, a regulatory subunit of PP2A, contributes to adipocyte insulin resistance,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 437, pp. 97–107, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Squillace, S. Spiegel, and D. Salvemini, “Targeting the sphingosine-1-phosphate axis for developing non-narcotic pain therapeutics,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 851–867, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. N. Lamb, “Ozanimod: first approval,” Drugs, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 841–848, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Olesch, E. Sirait-Fischer, M. Berkefeld et al., “S1PR4 ablation reduces tumor growth and improves chemotherapy via Cd8+ T cell expansion,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 130, no. 10, pp. 5461–5476, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. McGowan, N. Haddadi, N. T. Nassif, and Y. Lin, “Targeting the Sphk-S1p-Sipr pathway as a potential therapeutic approach for Covid-19,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 19, p. 7189, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Baer, W. Colon-Moran, and N. Bhattarai, “Characterization of the effects of immunomodulatory drug fingolimod (Fty720) on human T cell receptor signaling pathways,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, article 10910, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Kendall and C. J. Hupfeld, “Fty720, a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, reverses high-fat diet-induced weight gain, insulin resistance and adipose tissue inflammation in C57bl/6 mice,” Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 802–805, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Okamoto, N. Takuwa, K. Gonda et al., “EDG1 is a functional sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor that is linked via a Gi/oto multiple signaling pathways, including phospholipase C activation, Ca2+ mobilization, Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, and adenylate cyclase inhibition,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 42, pp. 27104–27110, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Cantrell Stanford, A. J. Morris, M. Sunkara, G. J. Popa, K. L. Larson, and S. Ozcan, “Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1p) regulates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic beta cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 16, pp. 13457–13464, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Brinkmann, “Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors in health and disease: mechanistic insights from gene deletion studies and reverse pharmacology,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 84–105, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Lee, S. Thangada, K. P. Claffey et al., “Vascular endothelial cell adherens junction assembly and morphogenesis induced by sphingosine-1-phosphate,” Cell, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 301–312, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kon, K. Sato, T. Watanabe et al., “Comparison of intrinsic activities of the putative sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor subtypes to regulate several signaling pathways in their Cdna-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 34, pp. 23940–23947, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Skoura, T. Sanchez, K. Claffey, S. M. Mandala, R. L. Proia, and T. Hla, “Essential role of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 2 in pathological angiogenesis of the mouse retina,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 9, pp. 2506–2516, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Okamoto, N. Takuwa, Y. Yatomi, K. Gonda, H. Shigematsu, and Y. Takuwa, “EDG3 is a functional receptor specific for sphingosine 1-phosphate and sphingosylphosphorylcholine with signaling characteristics distinct from EDG1 and AGR16,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 260, no. 1, pp. 203–208, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Li, W. El-Kholy, C. J. Rhodes, and P. L. Brubaker, “Glucagon-like peptide-1 protects beta cells from cytokine-induced apoptosis and necrosis: role of protein kinase B,” Diabetologia, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1339–1349, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Malek, R. E. Toman, L. C. Edsall et al., “Nrg-1 belongs to the endothelial differentiation gene family of G protein-coupled sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 8, pp. 5692–5699, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kohno, H. Matsuyuki, Y. Inagaki, and Y. Igarashi, “Sphingosine 1-phosphate promotes cell migration through the activation of Cdc42 in Edg-6/S1p4-expressing cells,” Genes to Cells, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 685–697, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. A. Blaho and T. Hla, “An update on the biology of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1596–1608, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yamazaki, J. Kon, K. Sato et al., “Edg-6 as a putative sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor coupling to Ca²⁺ signaling pathway,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 268, no. 2, pp. 583–589, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Van Brocklyn, M. H. Graler, G. Bernhardt, J. P. Hobson, M. Lipp, and S. Spiegel, “Sphingosine-1-phosphate is a ligand for the G protein-coupled receptor Edg-6,” Blood, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 2624–2629, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Graler, R. Grosse, A. Kusch, E. Kremmer, T. Gudermann, and M. Lipp, “The sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor S1P4 regulates cell shape and motility via coupling to Gi and G12/13,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 507–519, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Im, C. E. Heise, N. Ancellin et al., “Characterization of a novel sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor, Edg-8,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 19, pp. 14281–14286, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Qiong He et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1711

Downloads

1197

Citations