Research Article

Worldwide Research Trends on Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2004–2020): Suggestions for Researchers

Table 2

Top 10 most cited articles.

RankYearArticleIF(2019)Total citationsType of study

12017David G. Armstrong, et al. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017, 376 (24): 2367-237574.69674Review
22015Robert G. Frykberg, et al. Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds. Advance in Wound Care. 2015, 4 (9): 560-5824.73559Review
32014Joseph L. Mills, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery lower extremity threatened limb classification system: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI). Journal Vascular Surgery. 2014, 59 (1):2203.40498Review
42012P. T. Sudheesh Kumar, et al. Flexible and microporous chitosan hydrogel/Nano ZnO composite bandages for wound dressing: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.2012, 4 (5): 2618-26298.75460Basic medical study
52012Brian M. Peters, et al. Polymicrobial interactions: impact on pathogenesis and human disease. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2012, 25 (1): 193-+22.55374Review
62013Liane I.F. Moura, et al. Recent advances on the development of wound dressings for diabetic foot ulcer treatment—a review. Acta Materialia Inc. 2013, 9 (7):7093-71147.24344Review
72015Boateng, Joshua, et al. Advanced therapeutic dressings for effective wound healing—a review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015, 104 (11): 3653-36802.99339Review
82017Pengzi Zhang, et al. Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Medicine. 2017, 49 (2): 106-1163.24323Review
92011Stephen R. Thom, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen – its mechanisms and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surgery. 2011, 127 (1): 131S-141S4.20316Review
102011Debin Lu, et al. Comparison of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells with bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells for treatment of diabetic critical limb ischemia and foot ulcer: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2011, 92 (1): 26-364.23275Clinical research