Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 584656, 29 pages
Research Article

The Kansei Design Characteristics towards Learning Style

Fakulti Kejuruteraan Pembuatan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Melaka, Malaysia

Received 11 December 2012; Revised 5 April 2013; Accepted 9 April 2013

Academic Editor: Khoa Le

Copyright © 2013 Haeryip Sihombing et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. S. Dunn and K. J. Dunn, “Learning styles/teaching styles: should they….can they…be matched?” Educational Leadership, pp. 238–244, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  2. N. F. Horn, “Esophoria and exophoria in relation to personality,” Senior Honors Projects Paper no. 213, 2011, View at Google Scholar
  3. C. E. Cornett, What You Should Know about Teaching and Learning Styles, Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, Bloomington, India, 1983.
  4. E. S. Smith, “Learning styles: a holistic approach,” Journal of European Industrial Training, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 29–36, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  5. H. Pashler, M. McDaniel, D. Rohrer, and R. Bjork, “Learning styles concepts and evidence,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 105–119, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. F. Grasha, “Using traditional versus naturalistic approaches to assessing learning styles in college teaching,” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, vol. 1, pp. 23–38, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. E. Dyer, “Teaching to Different Learning Styles. UF IFAS Extension,” no. WC083, 2008,
  8. R. M. Felder and B. A. Soloman, “Learning Styles and Strategies,” 1999,
  9. R. E. Miller, “Student performance: conduct and behavior concerns,” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 248–251, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  10. R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Understanding student differences,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 57–72, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Choi and S. Sardar, “An empirical investigation of the relationships among cognitive abilities, cognitive style, and learning preferences in students enrolled in specialized degree courses at a Canadian college,” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  12. A. Gregoroc, Gregorc Style Delineator: Development, Technical, and Administration Manual, Gregorc Associates, Columbia, Conn, USA, 1982.
  13. R. Dunn and S. A. Griggs, Practical Approaches to Using Learning Styles in Higher Education, Bergin & Garvey, Westport, Conn, USA, 2000.
  14. A. Duff, E. Boyle, K. Dunleavy, and J. Ferguson, “The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1907–1920, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. Mariani, “Learning styles: an approach to individual differences,” in Learning Paths—Tante Vie Per Imprare. British Council, Milan Conference, pp. 147–153, 1995,
  16. G. Pask, “Styles and strategies of learning,” British Journal of Education. Psychology, vol. 46, pp. 128–148, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Heenaye, B. A. Gobin, and N. A. M. Khan, “Analysis of Felder-Soloman index of learning styles of students from management and engineering at the University of Mauritius,” Journal of Education and Vocational Research, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 244–249, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, “Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education,” Engineering Education, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 674–681, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  19. J. F. Glass and G. P. Muthu, “Learning and individual differences: a systems approach,” in Proceedings of HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, Australia, July 1999.
  20. L. D. Crane, The Alert Scale of Cognitive Style, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Mich, USA, 1989.
  21. M. Bernasconi, C. Choirat, and R. Seri, “The analytic hierarchy process and the theory of measurement,” Management Science, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 699–711, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Nagamachi, “Perspectives of Kansei engineering/ Kansei ergonomics,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Human—Computer Interaction, pp. 315–319, Singapore, 2001.
  23. S. H. Lee, A. Harada, and P. J. Stappers, “Pleasure with products: design based on Kansei,” in Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability, W. S. Green, Ed., chapter 16, pp. 219–230, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, UK, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  24. C. Wei, M. Y. Ma, and Y. C. Lin, “Applying Kansei engineering to decision making in fragrance form design,” in Intelligent Decision Technologies, vol. 10 of Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, pp. 85–94, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  25. T. L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 1994.
  26. P. R. Drake, “Using the analytic hierarchy process in engineering education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 191–196, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Lee, S. J. Lou, R. C. Shuh, and K. H. Tse, “An AHP-based analysis of network knowledge management platforms for elementary school students,” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 52–59, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  28. R. Dunn and K. Dunn, Teaching Students through Their Individual Learning Styles, Reston Publishing, Reston, Va, USA, 1978.
  29. L. Curry, “Patterns of learning styles across selected medical specialities,” Educational Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 247–278, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. S. Cassidy, “Learning styles: an overview of theories, models, and measures,” Educational Psychology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 419–444, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus