Application of Unit Commitment with Market Pool in a Peaking Power Generation Firm in the Philippines for a Cost Reduction Case Study

Table 3

Sample of weekly dispatch schedule.

Week	Generator (load)
	1 (MW)	2 (MW)	3 (MW)	4 (MW)	WESM (MW)	Demand (MW)	Total cost (Php)	Actual cost (Php)	Difference (Php)
1	21.97	121	95.64	30	828.84	1,097.44	2,316,497.78	2,801,130.72	484,632.94
2	28.6	121	117	18	1,154.05	1,438.65	3,370,173.06	4,698,580.92	1,328,407.86
3	8.9	88	43.4	6.42	1,066.64	1,213.36	2,176,095.62	3,252,604.52	1,076,508.90
4	101.49	374.5	245.28	60.26	956.98	1,738.50	4,065,746.59	5,623,952.25	1,558,205.66
Total							11,928,513.05	16,376,268.41	4,447,755.36