Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 409357, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/409357
Research Article

Randomized SVD Methods in Hyperspectral Imaging

1Department of Mathematics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA
2Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
3Departments of Mathematics and Computer Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA

Received 16 May 2012; Accepted 2 August 2012

Academic Editor: Heesung Kwon

Copyright © 2012 Jiani Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. T. Eismann, Hyperspectral Remote Sensing, SPIE Press, 2012.
  2. H. F. Grahn and E. Paul Geladi, Techniques and Applications of Hyperspectral Image Analysis, Wiley, 2007.
  3. J. M. Bioucas-Dias, A. Plaza, N. Dobigeon et al., “Hyperspectral unmixing overview: geometrical, statistical, and sparse regression-based approaches,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 354–379, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. C. Harsanyi and C. I. Chang, “Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 779–785, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Castrodad, Z. Xing, J. Greer, E. Bosch, L. Carin, and G. Sapiro, “Learning discriminative sparse models for source separation and mapping of hyperspectral imagery,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 49, pp. 4263–4281, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  6. C. Li, T. Sun, K. F. Kelly, and Y. Zhang, “A compressive sensing and unmixing scheme for hyperspectral data processing,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1200–1210, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. X. Tang and W. Pearlman, “Three-dimensional wavelet-based compression of hyperspectral images,” Hyperspectral Data Compression, pp. 273–308, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  8. H. Wang, S. D. Babacan, and K. Sayood, “Lossless hyperspectral-image compression using context-based conditional average,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 4187–4193, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. H. Golub and C. F. V. Loan, Matrix Computations, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 3rd edition, 1996.
  10. I. Jolliffe, Principal Component Analysis, Springer, 2nd edition, 2002.
  11. J. E. Fowler, “Compressive-projection principal component analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2230–2242, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Drineas and M. W. Mahoney, “A randomized algorithm for a tensor-based generalization of the singular value decomposition,” Linear Algebra and Its Applications, vol. 420, no. 2-3, pp. 553–571, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Trefethen and D. Bau, Numerical Linear Algebra, Society For Industrial Mathematics, 1997.
  14. N. Halko, P. G. Martinsson, and J. A. Tropp, “Finding structure with randomness: probabilistic algorithms for constructing approximate matrix decompositions,” SIAM Review, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 217–288, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Q. Zhang, R. Plemmons, D. Kittle, D. Brady, and S. Prasad, “Joint segmentation and reconstruction of hyperspectral data with compressed measurements,” Applied Optics, vol. 50, no. 22, pp. 4417–4435, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. E. Gehm, R. John, D. J. Brady, R. M. Willett, and T. J. Schulz, “Single-shot compressive spectral imaging with a dual-disperser architecture,” Optics Express, vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 14013–14027, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Wagadarikar, R. John, R. Willett, and D. Brady, “Single disperser design for coded aperture snapshot spectral imaging,” Applied Optics, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. B44–B51, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Chen, N. M. Nasrabadi, and T. D. Tran, “Effects of linear projections on the performance of target detection and classification in hyperspectral imagery,” Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID 053563, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Martinsson, “Randomized methods for computing the singular value decomposition of very large matrices,” in Workshop on Algorithms for Modern Massive Data Sets, 2012.
  20. A. D. Meigs, L. J. Otten, and T. Y. Cherezova, “Ultraspectral imaging: a new contribution to global virtual presence,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, vol. 2, pp. 5–12, March 1998. View at Scopus
  21. A. Berk, G. P. Anderson, P. K. Acharya et al., “MODTRAN 5, a reformulated atmospheric band model with auxiliary species and practical multiple scattering options: update,” in Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XI, vol. 5806 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 662–667, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. Parlett, The Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem, vol. 20, Society for Industrial Mathematics, 1998.
  23. M. A. O'Neil and M. Burtscher, “Floating-point data compression at 75 Gb/s on a GPU,” in Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on General Purpose Processing on Graphics Processing Units (GPGPU '11), p. 7, March 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. C. Olsen, S. Bergman, and R. G. Resmini, “Target detection in a forest environment using spectral imagery,” in Imaging Spectrometry III, vol. 3118 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 46–56, July 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. I. Chang, “Target signature-constrained mixed pixel classification for hyperspectral imagery,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1065–1081, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. Thai and G. Healey, “Invariant subpixel material detection in hyperspectral imagery,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 599–608, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus