Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 1048385, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1048385
Research Article

An Online Causal Inference Framework for Modeling and Designing Systems Involving User Preferences: A State-Space Approach

1Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
2Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to Ibrahim Delibalta

Received 2 March 2017; Revised 20 April 2017; Accepted 3 May 2017; Published 22 June 2017

Academic Editor: Zhixin Yang

Copyright © 2017 Ibrahim Delibalta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Gupta, D. Varshney, H. Jhamtani, D. Kedia, and S. Karwa, “Identifying purchase intent from social posts,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM '14), June 2014. View at Scopus
  2. D. Ruta, “Automated trading with machine learning on big data,” in Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress '14), pp. 824–830, July 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Wang and P. M. Djurić, “Social learning with heterogeneous agents and sequential decision making,” Digital Signal Processing, vol. 47, pp. 17–24, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. L. Bottou and Y. Le Cun, “On-line learning for very large data sets,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 137–151, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. L. Bottou and O. Bousquet, “The tradeoffs of large scale learning,” In Advances in Neural Information Processing (NISP), pp. 1–8, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Yan, N. Liu, G. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. Jiang, and Z. Chen, “How much can behavioral targeting help online advertising?” in Proceedings of the 18th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW '09), pp. 261–270, April 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Peng, D. Liang, and C. Choi, “Evaluating parallel logistic regression models,” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data '13), pp. 119–126, October 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Bottou, J. Peters, J. Quiñonero-Candela et al., “Counterfactual reasoning and learning systems: the example of computational advertising,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 14, pp. 3207–3260, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. C. Sübakan, B. Kurt, A. T. Cemgil, and B. Sankur, “Probabilistic sequence clustering with spectral learning,” Digital Signal Processing: a Review Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Achbany, I. J. Jureta, S. Faulkner, and F. Fouss, “Continually learning optimal allocations of services to tasks,” IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 141–154, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Jahrer, A. Töscher, and R. Legenstein, “Combining predictions for accurate recommender systems,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '10), pp. 693–701, July 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Töscher, M. Jahrer, and R. Legenstein, “Improved neighborhood-based algorithms for large-scale recommender systems,” in Proceedings of the 2nd KDD Workshop on Large-Scale Recommender Systems and the Netflix Prize Competition (NETFLIX '08), August 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Chan, R. Ge, O. Gershony, T. Hesterberg, and D. Lambert, “Evaluating online ad campaigns in a pipeline: causal models at scale,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '10), pp. 7–15, July 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Epstein and R. E. Robertson, “The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 33, pp. E4512–E4521, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. A. Salah, B. Lepri, F. Pianesi, and A. S. Pentland, “Human behavior understanding for inducing behavioral change: application perspectives,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Human Behavior Understanding, vol. 7065, pp. 1–15, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Z. Zarsky, Thinking outside The Box: considering Transparency, Anonymity, and Pseudonymity as Overall Solutions to the Problems of Information Privacy in the Internet Society, vol. 58, University of Miami Law Review, 2004.
  17. P. Wang, D. Yin, M. Meytlis, J. Yang, and Y. Chang, “Rethink targeting: detect 'smart cheating' in online advertising through causal inference,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '15), pp. 133-134, May 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Wang, W. Sun, D. Yin, J. Yang, and Y. Chang, “Robust tree-based causal inference for complex ad effectiveness analysis,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '15), pp. 67–76, February 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. H. Brodersen, F. Gallusser, J. Koehler, N. Remy, and S. L. Scott, “Inferring causal impact using bayesian structural time-series models,” Annals of Applied Statistics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 247–274, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. W. Sun, P. Wang, D. Yin, J. Yang, and Y. Chang, “Causal inference via sparse additive models with application to online advertising,” in Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '15), 2015.
  21. C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2006. View at MathSciNet
  22. B. D. O. Anderson and J. B. Moore, Optimal Filtering, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 1979.
  23. S. S. Kozat, A. C. Singer, and G. C. Zeitler, “Universal piecewise linear prediction via context trees,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 3730–3745, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. D. Vanli and S. S. Kozat, “A comprehensive approach to universal piecewise nonlinear regression based on trees,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 62, no. 20, pp. 5471–5486, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. A. C. Singer, S. S. Kozat, and M. Feder, “Universal linear least squares prediction: upper and lower bounds,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 2354–2362, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus