Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 1831856, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1831856
Research Article

Crosslinguistic Intelligibility of Russian and German Speech in Noisy Environment

Institute of Applied and Mathematical Linguistics, Moscow State Linguistic University, Ostozhenka 38, Moscow 119034, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed to Maria Grigorieva; ur.liam@211mavonavi

Received 19 June 2016; Revised 26 January 2017; Accepted 26 February 2017; Published 13 July 2017

Academic Editor: Alexey Karpov

Copyright © 2017 Rodmonga Potapova and Maria Grigorieva. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Anderson, E. Skoe, B. Chandrasekaran, S. Zecker, and N. Kraus, “Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children,” Hearing Research, vol. 270, no. 1-2, pp. 151–157, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Anderson, A. Parbery-Clark, H.-G. Yi, and N. Kraus, “A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 750–757, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Cunningham, T. Nicol, S. G. Zecker, A. Bradlow, and N. Kraus, “Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 758–767, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Poeppel, W. J. Idsardi, and V. Van Wassenhove, “Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 363, no. 1493, pp. 1071–1086, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. H. Song, E. Skoe, K. Banai, and N. Kraus, “Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1180–1190, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. D. R. Drager and J. E. Reichle, “Effects of discourse context on the intelligibility of synthesized speech for young adult and older adult listeners: applications for AAC,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1052–1057, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. King, J. Yamagishi, and C. Valentini-Botinhao, “Evaluating speech intelligibility enhancement for HMM-based synthetic speech in noise,” in Proceedings of the SAPA-SCALE Workshop on Statistical and Perceptual Audition (SAPA-SCALE '12), Portland, Ore, USA, 2012.
  8. S. Kamath and P. Loizou, “A multi-band spectral subtraction method for enhancing speech corrupted by colored noise,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '02), vol. 4, pp. 4160–4164, Orlando, Fla, USA, May 2002.
  9. G. Kim, Y. Lu, Y. Hu, and P. C. Loizou, “An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 1486–1494, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Zoghlami and Z. Lachiri, “Application of perceptual filtering models to noisy speech signals enhancement,” Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 282019, 12 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. A. Parbery-Clark, E. Skoe, C. Lam, and N. Kraus, “Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 653–661, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Slater, E. Skoe, D. L. Strait, S. O'Connell, E. Thompson, and N. Kraus, “Music training improves speech-in-noise perception: longitudinal evidence from a community-based music program,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 291, pp. 244–252, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Pinet, P. Iverson, and B. G. Evans, “Perceptual adaptation for l1 and l2 accents in noise by monolingual British English listeners,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, August 2011.
  14. M. J. Munro and T. M. Derwing, “Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners,” Language Learning, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 285–310, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. J. Munro, “The effects of noise on the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech,” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 139–154, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Song and P. Iverson, “Measuring speech-in-noise intelligibility for spontaneous speech: the effect of native and non-native accents,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, UK, August 2015.
  17. T. Bent and A. R. Bradlow, “The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 1600–1610, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. S. Bykov, Theory of speech intelligibility and improving the efficiency of telephone communications, Moscow, Russia, 1959 (Russian).
  19. N. B. Pokrovskiy, “Calculation and measurement of speech intelligibility,” Moscow, 1962 (Russian).
  20. M. A. Sapozhkov, “Speech signal in cybernetics and communication,” Moscow, 1963 (Russian).
  21. L. V. Zlatoustova, R. K. Potapova, V. V. Potapov, and V. N. Trunin-Donskoy, General and Applied Phonetics: Textbook, MSU, Moscow, Russia, 2nd edition, 1997 (Russian).
  22. R. K. Potapova and O. N. Statsenko, “Preliminary results of the investigation of oral speech material considering code-switching,” in Proceedings of the 16th Session of the Russian Acoustical Society, Moscow, Russia, November 2005.
  23. R. Potapova and V. Potapov, “Associative mechanism of foreign language perception (forensic phonetic aspect),” in Proceedings of the Speech and Computer. SPECOM 2014, A. Ronzhin, R. Potapova, and V. Delic, Eds., vol. 8773 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 113–122, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. R. Potapova and V. Potapov, “Cognitive mechanism of semantic content decoding of spoken discourse in noise,” in Proceedings of the Speech and Computer. SPECOM 2015, A. Ronzhin, R. Potapova, and N. Fakotakis, Eds., vol. 9319 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 153–160, Springer Internartional Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. R. K. Potapova, “Syllabic phonetics of the Germanic languages: textbook,” Moscow, 1986 (Russian).
  26. R. K. Potapova, Speech: Communication, Information, Cybernetics, Moscow, Russia, 4th edition, 2010 (Russian).
  27. Council of Europe, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR), http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf.
  28. O. V. Ivanov, “Statistics/Training course for sociologists and managers. Part 2. Confidence intervals. Hypothesis testing. Methods and their application,” Moscow, 2005 (Russian).
  29. N. Sh. Kremer, Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics: Textbook for Universities, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, 2nd edition, 2004 (Russian).
  30. Online program for creating “word clouds” Wordle™, http://www.wordle.net.
  31. O. N. Lyashevskaya and S. A. Sharov, New frequency dictionary of Russian vocabulary. The Frequency dictionary of modern Russian language (on the materials of the National corpus of the Russian language), (Russian), http://dict.ruslang.ru/freq.php.