Research Article
3D Curvelet-Based Segmentation and Quantification of Drusen in Optical Coherence Tomography Images
Table 3
Comparison of automatic versus manual results of drusenoid region segmentation.
| In comparison to | Dice coefficient (DC) | TPVF | FPVF |
| Grader 1 | 89.45% ± 3.46% | 89.21% ± 4.61% | 0.15% ± 0.21% | Grader 2 | 89.85% ± 4.34% | 90.12% ± 4.43% | 0.12% ± 0.26% | Graders 1 & 2 | 90.23% ± 4.12% | 89.15% ± 3.76% | 0.17% ± 0.18% |
|
|