Research Article
Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Differences of China’s Power Carbon Footprint
Table 2
TPIC and PCFD of China’s power deficit provinces in 2008 and 2018.
| Deficit area | 2008 | 2018 | IRTP (%) | AUH (h) | PCFD (%) | IRTP (%) | AUH (h) | PCFD (%) |
| Liaoning | 85.87 | 4851 | 24.5 | 72.20 | 4251 | 31.81 | Hebei | 86.93 | 5650 | 42.93 | 67.21 | 5056 | 62.89 | Beijing | 81.46 | 3920 | 18.44 | 88.34 | 3754 | 35.90 | Tianjin | 99.73 | 4325 | 20.06 | 93.49 | 4147 | 33.56 | Shandong | 96.06 | 5410 | 83.71 | 82.31 | 4660 | 115 | Henan | — | — | — | 83.29 | 3825 | 80.97 | Chongqing | — | — | — | 66.35 | 3020 | 13.13 | Hunan | — | — | — | 53.02 | 3564 | 18.65 | Jiangxi | — | — | — | 61.05 | 5023 | 20.89 | Jiangsu | 93.88 | 5469 | 110.22 | 83.77 | 4909 | 1.25 | Shanghai | 99.19 | 4941 | 112.25 | 94.62 | 3731 | 118.85 | Zhejiang | 76.21 | 5536 | 57.34 | 74.43 | 4165 | 76.39 | Guangdong | 74.33 | 5338 | 80.56 | 78.93 | 4069 | 99.43 | China | 75.87 | 3856 | 15.81 | 57.14 | 2010 | 28.77 |
|
|