Comparison of Technological Options for Distributed Generation-Combined Heat and Power in Rajasthan State of India

<table>Comparison of annualised life cycle costs for different technological options when DG-CHP is considered (discount rate <svg height="15.1125" id="M21" style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 69.912498 15.1125" width="69.912498" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.162)"><path d="M300 -147l-18 -23q-106 71 -159 185.5t-53 254.5v1q0 139 53 252.5t159 186.5l18 -24q-74 -62 -115.5 -173.5t-41.5 -242.5q0 -130 41.5 -242.5t115.5 -174.5z" id="x28"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,5.944,12.162)"><path d="M530 686q-79 -330 -126 -595q-5 -24 4 -24q22 0 77 53l16 -24q-42 -49 -88 -78.5t-72 -29.5q-37 0 -19 83l21 99h-2q-62 -83 -153 -141q-65 -41 -97 -41q-28 0 -48 31.5t-20 91.5q0 71 32.5 144t88.5 118q36 30 94 52.5t94 22.5q38 0 68 -13l29 158q7 40 2 47.5t-38 7.5
h-35l1 26q39 4 76 13.5t58.5 17t27.5 7.5q16 0 9 -26zM387 375q-11 11 -38.5 20t-51.5 9q-45 0 -79 -23q-46 -32 -77.5 -107.5t-31.5 -143.5q0 -40 9.5 -58.5t23.5 -18.5q40 0 113.5 70t99.5 118z" id="x1D451"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,15.378,12.162)"><path d="M275 270q0 -296 -211 -440l-19 23q75 62 116.5 174t41.5 243t-42 243t-116 173l19 24q211 -144 211 -440z" id="x29"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,25.969,12.162)"><path d="M535 323h-483v50h483v-50zM535 138h-483v50h483v-50z" id="x3D"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,40.673,12.162)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,48.832,12.162)"><path d="M241 635q53 0 94 -28.5t63.5 -76t33.5 -102.5t11 -116q0 -58 -11 -112.5t-34 -103.5t-63.5 -78.5t-94.5 -29.5t-95 28t-64.5 75t-34.5 102.5t-11 118.5q0 58 11.5 112.5t34.5 103t64.5 78t95.5 29.5zM238 602q-32 0 -55.5 -25t-35.5 -68t-17.5 -91t-5.5 -105
q0 -76 10 -138.5t37 -107.5t69 -45q32 0 55.5 25t35.5 68.5t17.5 91.5t5.5 105t-5.5 105.5t-18 92t-36 68t-56.5 24.5z" id="x30"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,56.991,12.162)"><path d="M594 629l-404 -661l-31 23l402 661zM194 635q70 0 107 -56t37 -125t-37.5 -125.5t-107.5 -56.5t-107 56.5t-37 124.5q0 70 37.5 126t107.5 56zM193 605q-28 0 -45 -29t-21.5 -59.5t-4.5 -62.5t4.5 -63t22 -60t45.5 -29q22 0 37.5 16t22 42t9 48t2.5 45q0 152 -72 152z
M567 351q69 0 106 -56t37 -125t-37 -125.5t-107 -56.5t-107.5 56.5t-37.5 124.5q0 43 14.5 83t49 69.5t82.5 29.5zM566 322q-28 0 -45 -28.5t-22 -59.5t-5 -64q0 -23 3 -46t10.5 -48.5t23 -41.5t36.5 -16q28 0 45 29.5t21 59.5t4 62q0 24 -2.5 46.5t-9.5 48.5t-22 42t-37 16
z" id="x25"></path></g>
</svg>) for the month of January 2013.</table>

Journal of Energy

fig7

Figure 7

Figure 7: Comparison of Technological Options for Distributed Generation-Combined Heat and Power in Rajasthan State of India 