Research Article
A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness
Table 8
Predictor variables for active transport to school, student baseline data.
| | Variable | Student use of active transport | | No active transport
(no trips)
(%) | Active transport
(1–10 trips)
(%) |
| | School location | | | | | Regional | 110 (31.8) | 236 (68.2) | 0.043 | | Metropolitan | 29 (22.3) | 101 (77.7) | | Child gender | | | | | Male | 62 (27.6) | 163 (72.4) | 0.455 | | Female | 77 (30.7) | 174 (69.3) | | Child grade | | | | | Grade 4 | 48 (34.8) | 90 (65.2) | | | Grade 5 | 48 (29.1) | 117 (70.9) | 0.160 | | Grade 6 | 43 (24.9) | 130 (75.1) | | | Whether student cycles after school hours | | | | | Never/sometimes | 71 (33.2) | 143 (66.8) | 0.077 | | Quite often/most days | 67 (25.8) | 193 (74.2) | | Whether adults in the household cycle | | | | | No | 58 (33.5) | 115 (66.5) | 0.114 | | Yes | 80 (26.7) | 220 (73.3) | | Whether student had participated in Bike Ed. | | | | | No | 59 (26.1) | 167 (73.9) | 0.158 | | Yes | 80 (32.0) | 170 (68.0) |
|
|
Number of students.
Bold: .
|
