Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice in respect of Medical Waste Management among Healthcare Workers in Clinics

Table 1

Interpretation of the mean KAP item scores in this study.

Questionnaire	Interpretation method
Part A: sociodemographic characteristics	(i) Checklist: a list of items to-tick-off
Part B: general information of the MWM
Part C: knowledge of MWM	(i) Low if scores <33%
Part D: attitudes towards MWM	(ii) Medium if scores 33–66%
Part E: practice in respect of MWM	(iii) High if scores >66%
Categorization of the scores for KAP
High K, positive A, and good P	(+, +, +)
Low K, negative A, and poor P	(−, −, −)
High K, positive A, and poor P	(+, +, −)
High K, negative A, and poor P	(+, −, −)
High K, negative A, and good P	(+, −, +)
Low K, positive A, and good P	(−, +, +)
Low K, negative A, and good P	(−, −, +)
Low K, positive A, and poor P	(−, +, −)