Research Article

Stakeholder Perceptions of Sustainable Infrastructure Project Delivery: A Comparative Analysis between Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao

Table 5

Sustainability concerns with conflicting ratings as evaluated by paired stakeholder groups.
(a)

Items related to infrastructure project sustainability
Paired stakeholder groupsECO1ECO2ECO3ECO4ECO5SOC1SOC2SOC3SOC4SOC5SOC6SOC7SOC8SOC9ENV1ENV2ENV3ENV4Sum

Government department vs. owners7
Government department vs. designers15
Government department vs. contractors15
Government department vs. supervising engineers16
Government department vs. operators10
Government department vs. end-users11
Government department vs. NGOs5
Owners vs. designers16
Owners vs. contractors14
Owners vs. supervising engineers13

(b)

Items related to infrastructure project sustainability
Paired stakeholder groupsECO1ECO2ECO3ECO4ECO5SOC1SOC2SOC3SOC4SOC5SOC6SOC7SOC8SOC9ENV1ENV2ENV3ENV4Sum

Owners vs. operators4
Owners vs. end-users7
Owners vs. NGOs4
Designers vs. contractors4
Designers vs. supervising engineers4
Designers vs. operators13
Designers vs. end-users15
Designers vs. NGOs13
Contractors vs. supervising engineers2
Contractors vs. operators15

(c)

Items related to infrastructure project sustainability
Paired stakeholder groupsECO1ECO2ECO3ECO4ECO5SOC1SOC2SOC3SOC4SOC5SOC6SOC7SOC8SOC9ENV1ENV2ENV3ENV4Sum

Contractors vs. end-users15
Contractors vs. NGOs13
Supervising engineers vs. operators16
Supervising engineers vs. end-users15
Supervising engineers vs. NGOs14
Operators vs. end-users5
Operators vs. NGOs5
End-users vs. NGOs9
Overall1816161881618201812181922201481816295