Research Article
Stakeholder Perceptions of Sustainable Infrastructure Project Delivery: A Comparative Analysis between Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao
Table 5
Sustainability concerns with conflicting ratings as evaluated by paired stakeholder groups.
(a) |
| Items related to infrastructure project sustainability | Paired stakeholder groups | ECO1 | ECO2 | ECO3 | ECO4 | ECO5 | SOC1 | SOC2 | SOC3 | SOC4 | SOC5 | SOC6 | SOC7 | SOC8 | SOC9 | ENV1 | ENV2 | ENV3 | ENV4 | Sum |
| Government department vs. owners | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | | | | √ | | | | | | | | 7 | Government department vs. designers | √ | √ | √ | √ | | | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 15 | Government department vs. contractors | √ | √ | √ | √ | | | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 15 | Government department vs. supervising engineers | √ | √ | √ | √ | | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 16 | Government department vs. operators | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | | | | √ | √ | √ | √ | | | √ | | | 10 | Government department vs. end-users | √ | √ | | √ | | √ | √ | | √ | | √ | | √ | √ | | √ | √ | | 11 | Government department vs. NGOs | √ | √ | √ | √ | | | | | | | | | √ | | | | | | 5 | Owners vs. designers | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 16 | Owners vs. contractors | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | 14 | Owners vs. supervising engineers | √ | | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | | 13 |
|
|
(b) |
| Items related to infrastructure project sustainability | Paired stakeholder groups | ECO1 | ECO2 | ECO3 | ECO4 | ECO5 | SOC1 | SOC2 | SOC3 | SOC4 | SOC5 | SOC6 | SOC7 | SOC8 | SOC9 | ENV1 | ENV2 | ENV3 | ENV4 | Sum |
| Owners vs. operators | | | | | √ | | | | | | √ | √ | √ | | | | | | 4 | Owners vs. end-users | | | √ | | √ | | | √ | √ | | | | √ | √ | | | √ | | 7 | Owners vs. NGOs | | | | | √ | √ | | | | | √ | | √ | | | | | | 4 | Designers vs. contractors | | √ | | | | | | √ | | √ | | | | √ | | | | | 4 | Designers vs. supervising engineers | | √ | | | | | | √ | | √ | | | | | | | | √ | 4 | Designers vs. operators | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | | √ | | | √ | √ | 13 | Designers vs. end-users | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | 15 | Designers vs. NGOs | √ | | | √ | | | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 13 | Contractors vs. supervising engineers | | | | | | | | | | √ | | | | | | | | √ | 2 | Contractors vs. operators | √ | | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | 15 |
|
|
(c) |
| Items related to infrastructure project sustainability | Paired stakeholder groups | ECO1 | ECO2 | ECO3 | ECO4 | ECO5 | SOC1 | SOC2 | SOC3 | SOC4 | SOC5 | SOC6 | SOC7 | SOC8 | SOC9 | ENV1 | ENV2 | ENV3 | ENV4 | Sum |
| Contractors vs. end-users | √ | | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | 15 | Contractors vs. NGOs | √ | | | √ | | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | 13 | Supervising engineers vs. operators | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | 16 | Supervising engineers vs. end-users | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | √ | 15 | Supervising engineers vs. NGOs | √ | | | | | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | 14 | Operators vs. end-users | | | | | | | √ | √ | | | | √ | √ | √ | | | | | 5 | Operators vs. NGOs | | √ | | | | √ | | | | | √ | √ | √ | | | | | | 5 | End-users vs. NGOs | | √ | √ | | | √ | √ | √ | √ | | √ | | | √ | | | √ | | 9 | Overall | 18 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 20 | 18 | 12 | 18 | 19 | 22 | 20 | 14 | 8 | 18 | 16 | 295 |
|
|