Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Volume 2 (2011), Issue 1, Pages 25-41
http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2040-2295.2.1.25
Research Article

Understanding Contrasting Approaches to Nationwide Implementations of Electronic Health Record Systems: England, the USA and Australia

Zoe Morrison,1 Ann Robertson,1 Kathrin Cresswell,1 Sarah Crowe,2 and Aziz Sheikh1

1eHealth Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK
2School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK

Received 1 July 2010; Accepted 1 November 2010

Copyright © 2011 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. A. Massaro, “Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: 1. Impact on organizational culture and behaviour,” Acad Med, vol. 68, pp. 20–25, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Sicotte, J. L. Denis, and P. Lehoux, “The Computer Based Patient Record: A Strategic Issue in Process Innovation,” Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 431–443, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Southon, C. Sauer, and K. Dampney, “Lessons from a failed information systems initiative: issues for complex organisations,” Int J Med Inform, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 33–46, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Robertson, K. Cresswell, A. Takian et al., “Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation,” BMJ, vol. 341, c4564, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. K. M. Cresswell and A. Sheikh, “The NHS Care Record Service (NHS CRS): recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption,” Inform Prim Care, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 161–4, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  6. E. Coiera, “Building a National Health IT System from the middle out,” J Am Med Inform Assoc, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 271–273, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Car, C. Anandan, A. Black, K. Cresswell, C. Pagliari, B. McKinstry et al., The Impact of eHealth on the Quality & Safety of Healthcare - A systematic overview and synthesis of the literature. Report for the NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme. 2008.
  8. A. Majed, J. Car, and A. Sheikh, “Accuracy and completeness of electronic patient records in primary care,” Family Practice, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 213–214, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Adler-Milstein and D. W. Bates, “Paperless healthcare: Progress and challenges of an IT-enabled healthcare system,” Business Horizons, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 119–130, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Berg, “Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 64, no. 2-3, pp. 143–156, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Classen, D. W. Bates, and C. R. Denham, “Meaningful Use of Computerized Prescriber Order Entry,” Journal of Patient Safety, vol. 6, no. 1, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  12. T. Greenhalgh, K. Stramer, T. Bratan, E. Byrne, J. Russell, S. Hinder et al., The Devil's in the Detail: Final Report of the independent evaluation of the Summary Care Record and HealthSpace programmes, University College London, London, 2010.
  13. T. Greenhalgh, K. Stramer, T. Bratan, E. Byrne, Y. Mohammad, and J. Russell, “Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory,” BMJ, vol. 337, no. oct23_1, a1786, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Boonstra and M. Broekhuis, “Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians From systematic review to taxonomy and interventions,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 10, 231, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  15. D. Protti, T. Bowden, and I. Johansen, “Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, part 1: healthcare system comparisons,” Inform Prim Care, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 183–187, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  16. D. Protti, T. Bowden, and I. Johansen, “Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, part 2: historical comparisons,” Inform Prim Care, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 189–193, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  17. D. Protti, T. Bowden, and I. Johansen, “Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, Part 3: Medical record environment comparisons,” Inform Prim Care, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 285–290, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  18. D. Protti, T. Bowden, and I. Johansen, “Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, Part 4: Benefits comparisons,” Inform Prim Care, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 291–296, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  19. D. Protti, T. Bowden, and I. Johansen, “Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, part 5: final comparisons,” Inform Prim Care, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  20. D. Protti, I. Johansen, and F. Perez-Torres, “Comparing the application of Health Information Technology in primary care in Denmark and Andalucia, Spain,” Int J Med Inform, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 270–283, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  21. “Canada's electronic health records initiative stalled by federal funding freeze,” Canadian Medical Association, 2010, (last accessed 21/06/10). View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Health Information Technology: Initial Set of standards, Implementation specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology (Interim Final Rule), Department of Health and Human Services, 2009, http://www.scribd.com/doc/26297852/Health-Information-Technology-Initial-Set-of-Standards-Implementation-Specifications-and-Certification-Criteria, (Accessed on 18.06.10).
  23. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, The ONC-Coordinated Federal Health IT Strategic Plan: 2008–2012, Department of Health and Human Services, 2008, Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/resources/HITStrategicPlan.pdf, (last accessed 18.06.10), 2010.
  24. Certification Commission for Health Information Technology Website, Available from: http://www.cchit.org/, (last accessed 18.06.10), 2010.
  25. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Department of Health and Human Services: 2010. Available from: http://healthit.hhs.gov, (last accessed 18.06.10), 2010.
  26. R. Pollack, Executive Vice President, American Hospital Association. Available from: www.aha.org/aha/letter/2010/100315-cl-EHRIFR.pdf, 2010.
  27. C. B. Wilson, American Medical Association. Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/news/speeches.shtml, (last accessed: 15.10.10), 2008.
  28. A. K. Jha, C. M. DesRoches, P. D. Kravovec, and M. S. Joshi, “A Progress Report on Electronic Health Records in U. S. Hospitals,” Health Affairs. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. Australian Government, A national health and hospitals network for Australia's future. Delivering better health and better hospitals. Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/report-redbook/$File/HRT_report3.pdf, 2010.
  30. Department of Health and Ageing, Building a 21st Century Primary Health Care System. Australia's First National Primary Health Care Strategy. 2010. Available at: http://www.yourhealth.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/550436A8DA6839ECCA25771B00220E23/$File/6552%20NPHC%201205.pdf, 2010.
  31. NEHTA, NEHTA Strategic Plan, 2009–12. Available at: http://www.nehta.gov.au/about-us/strategy, (last accessed 26.06.10), 2009.
  32. M. Harrison, Implementing Change in Health Systems, Sage Publications, London, 2004.
  33. S. Hamilton, G. Huby, A. Tierney, A. Powell, T. Kielmann, A. Sheikh et al., “Mind the gap between policy imperatives and service provision: a qualitative study of the process of respiratory service development in England and Wales,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 8, no. 1, 248, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  34. Department of Health, Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS, The Stationery Office, 2010.
  35. World Health Organisation, World Health Statistics 2009. Available from http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2009/en/index.html, (last accessed 24.06.10), 2009.
  36. C. DeNavas-Walt, B. D. Proctor, and J. C. Smith, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2007 U. S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration, U. S. Census Bureau. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf, (last accessed 24.06.10), 2008.
  37. E. MacAskill, Barack Obama's healthcare bill passed by Congress. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/22/us-healthcare-bill-passes-congress, (last accessed 29.11.10), 2010.
  38. D. H. Taylor Jr., “What price for-profit hospitals?” CMAJ, vol. 166, no. 11, pp. 1418–1419, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  39. P. J. Devereaux, P. T. L. Choi, C. Lacchetti, B. Weaver, H. J. Schunemann, T. Haines et al., “Asystematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals,” CMAJ, vol. 166, no. 11, pp. 1399–1406, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  40. P. J. Devereaux, D. Heels-Ansdell, C. Lacchetti, T. Haines, K. E. A. Burns, D. J. Cook et al., “Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ, vol. 170, no. 12, pp. 1817–1824, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  41. Institute of Medicine, The computer-based patient record: An essential technology for health care, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C., 1991.
  42. SmartHealthcare, Informatics Directorate takes over from CfH. http://www.smarthealthcare.com/informatics-directorate-05mar09, last accessed 13.09.10, 2010.
  43. T. Young, NHS IT to be reorganised. http://www.computing.co.uk/computing/news/2238260/nhs-reorganised, last accessed 13.09.10, 2009.
  44. J. Hoeksma, Bacon says ‘prove value of NPfIT deals’. http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/5767/bacon_says_%27prove_value_of_npfit_deals%27, last accessed 13.09.10, 2010.
  45. F. Barr, ICO issues guidance on SCR opt-outs. http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/6122/ico_issues_guidance_on_scr_opt-outs, last accessed 13.09.10, 2010.
  46. eHealth Insider, Urgent review of SCR consent model recommended. http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/3720/urgent_review_of_scr_consent_model_recommended, last accessed 13.09.10, 2008.
  47. T. Greenhalgh, G. W. Wood, T. Bratan, K. Stramer, and S. Hinder, “Patients attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative study,” BMJ, vol. 336, no. 7656, pp. 1290–1295, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  48. T. Greenhalgh, K. Stramer, T. Bratan, E. Byrne, J. Russell, and H. W. W. Potts, “Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study,” BMJ, vol. 340, no. jun16_4, c3111, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  49. SmartHealthcare, NPfIT goes to the country. http://www.smarthealthcare.com/england-patient-records, last accessed 13.09.10, 2010.
  50. T. Collins, Cerner and BT in Royal Free NPfIT rescue plan - but a setback for NPfIT vision of standard systems. http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/11/new-setback-for-npfit-vision-o.html, last accessed 13.09.10, 2008.
  51. Department of Health, The future of the National Programme for IT. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/MediaCentre/Pressreleases/DH_119293, last accessed: 04.10.2010, 2010.
  52. Kaiser Permanente, Connected for Health: using electronic health records to transform care delivery, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2010.
  53. S. H. Brown, M. J. Lincoln, P. J. Groen, and R. M. Kolodner, “VistA—U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs national-scale HIS,” Int J Med Inform, vol. 69, no. 2-3, pp. 135–156, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  54. Congressional Budget Office, The Health Care System for Veterans: An interim Report 2007. Available at: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/88xx/doc8892/12-21-VA_Healthcare.pdf, (last accessed 19.06.10), 2007.
  55. C. Johnson, R. Carlson, C. Tucker, and C. Willette, “Using BCMA software to improve patient safety in veterans administration medical centers,” Journal of Healthcare Information Management, vol. 16, no. 1, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  56. Department of Health and Ageing, Health Identifiers Service. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/5137E02F08412623CA2575ED008386B8/$File/20100202%20HI%20SERVICE%20-%20FAQs.pdf, last accessed 13.09.10, 2010.
  57. C. M. Byrne, L. M. Mercincavage, E. C. Pan, A. G. Vincent, D. S. Johnston, and B. Middleton, “The value from investments in health information technology at the U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs,” Health Aff (Millwood), vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 629–638, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  58. R. J. Lilford, J. Foster, and M. Pringle, “Evaluating eHealth: How to Make Evaluation More Methodologically Robust,” PLoS Med, vol. 6, no. 11, e1000186, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. R. J. Lilford, P. Chilton, K. Hemming, A. Girling, C. Taylor, and P. Barach, “Evaluating policy and service interventions: framework to guide selection and interpretation of study end points,” British Medical Journal, vol. 341, c4413, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. Office for National Statistics, Population Estimates. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=6, last accessed 21.06.10, 2010.
  61. American Hospital Association, HIT Incentive Payment Program: Definition of ‘Meaningful Use’ Available from: http://www.aha.org/aha/content/2010/pdf/10-ib-def-meaning-use.pdf, last accessed 19.06.10. 2010.
  62. Worldbank databank, World development indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?cid=GPD_1, last accessed 21.06.10, 2010.