Journal of Healthcare Engineering

Journal of Healthcare Engineering / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2 |Article ID 754619 |

Barbara Cherry, Ken Carpenter, "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Electronic Medical Records in a Long Term Care Facility Using Process Analysis", Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2, Article ID 754619, 12 pages, 2011.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Electronic Medical Records in a Long Term Care Facility Using Process Analysis

Received01 Jul 2010
Accepted01 Nov 2010


This study was conducted to determine the effect of the electronic medical record (EMR) system on work process efficiencies in a long-term care facility. Apre-post intervention study design was used with process flow analysis conducted as part of the data collection methodology. Work processes were measured through direct observation and recording of steps taken as nurses completed their daily work. Observed work processes were documented in the form of process flow charts. Process flow charts detail every step in a process and provide a unique and accurate method of evaluating the impact that EMR systems have on work flow in the healthcare setting. The study demonstrated that the EMR can lead to a reduction in the number of steps required to complete several daily work processes, allowing nurses the opportunity to dedicate more time to direct care of the facility's residents and thus contribute to improved quality care.


  1. P. Kemper, H. L. Komisar, and L. Alecxih, “Long-term care over an uncertain future: What can current retirees expect?” Inquiry, vol. 42, pp. 335–350, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  2. National Commission for Quality Long-Term Care, The long-term care workforce: Can the crisis be fixed? January, 2007. Institute for the Future of Aging Services. Available online at
  3. B. Cherry, M. Carter, D. Owen, and C. L. Lockhart, “Factors affecting electronic health record adoption in long-term care facilities,” Journal for Healthcare Quality, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 37–47, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  4. Institute of Medicine, Key capabilities of an electronic health record system, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2003.
  5. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st Century, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2001.
  6. B. Chaudhry, J. Wang, S. Wu, M. Maglione, W. Mojica, E. Roth et al., “Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 144, no. 10, pp. 742–752, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  7. C. L. Goldzweig, A. Towfigh, M. Maglione et al., “Costs and benefits of health information technology: New trends from the literature,” Health Affairs, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. w282–w93, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  8. C. M. DesRoches, E. G. Campbell, S. R. Rao et al., “Electronic health records in ambulatory care: A national survey of physicians,” New England Journal of Medicine, 2008, vol. 359, pp. 50–60, July 3, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. Parente and J. McCullough, “Health information technology and patient safety: Evidence from panel data,” Health Affairs, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 357–360, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. K. Jha, C. M. DesRoches, E. G. Campbell et al., “Use of electronic health records in U. S. hospitals,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, pp. 1628–38, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  11. A. K. Jha, C. M. DesRoches, A. Shields et al., “Evidence of an emerging digital divide among hospitals that care for the poor,” Health Affairs, vol. 28, pp. w1160–w1170, November 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  12. F. Mostashari, M. Tripathi, and M. Kendall, “A tale of two large community electronic health record extension projects,” Health Affairs, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 345–356, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  13. R. Kaushal, D. Bates, C. Jenter, S. Mills, L. Volk, E. Burdick et al., “Imminent adopters of electronic health records in ambulatory care,” Informatics in Primary Care, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J. Stevenson, G. Nilsson, G. Petersson, and P. Johanssson, “Nurses' experience of using electronic patient records in everyday practice in acute/inpatient ward settings: A literature review,” Health Informatics Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  15. T. Greenhalgh, K. Stramer, T. Bratan, E. Byrne, Y. Mohammad, and J. Russell, “Introduction of shared electronic records: Multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory,” BMJ, vol. 337, a1786, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  16. E. M. Campbell, K. P. Guappone, D. F. Sittig, R. H. Dykstra, and J. S. Ash, “Computerized provider order entry adoption: implications for clinical workflow,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  17. A. Kushniruk, E. Borycki, S. Kuwata, and J. Kannry, “Predicting changes in workflow resulting from healthcare information systems: ensuring the safety of healthcare,” Healthcare Quarterly, vol. 9, Spec No, pp. 114–118, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  18. Report to Congress, The Future supply of long-term care workers in relation to the aging baby boom generation. 2003. Report prepared by staff from the United States Department of Health and Human Services' Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
  19. National Commission on Nursing Workforce for Long-Term Care, Act now for your tomorrow. 2005. Retrieved from
  20. Institute of Medicine, Improving the quality of long-term care, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2001.
  21. J. Davidson, “Electronic medical records: what they are and how they will revolutionize the delivery of resident care,” Canadian Nursing Home, 2009, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 15–16, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  22. B. Cherry, E. W. Ford, and L. T. Peterson, “Experiences with electronic health records: Early adopters in long-term care facilities,” Health Care Management Review (tentatively Volume 36, number 3, 2011), (in press). View at: Google Scholar
  23. C. Pearce, A. Shachak, A. Kushniruk, and S. de Lusignan, “Usability: a critical dimension for assessing the quality of clinical systems,” Informatics in Primary Care, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 195–198, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  24. B. Kaplan and K. D. Harris-Salamone, “Health IT success and failure: Recommendations from literature and an AMIA Workshop,” JAMIA, vol. 16, pp. 291–299, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  25. E. M. Campbell, D. F. Sittig, J. S. Ash, K. P. Guappone, and R. H. Dykstra, “Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 547–556, 2006. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.