A Review of the Ergonomic Issues in the Laparoscopic Operating Room

Abstract

This review paper discusses the ergonomic challenges associated with laparoscopy in the operating room (OR) and summarizes the practical ergonomic solutions. The literature search was conducted in the fields of laparoscopy and applied ergonomics. Findings indicated that laparoscopic OR staff (surgeons, perioperative nurses and technicians) commonly experienced physical and mental ergonomic risks while working in prolonged static and awkward body positions. This study highlighted the need for more ergonomic interventions in OR environment in order to improve the efficiency of laparoscopy. Ergonomic solutions included utilizing adjustable equipment, placing computer peripherals in optimal locations, providing ergonomic instruments, and improving communication. Understanding the job- or task-related ergonomic risks and hazards could help identify intervention requirements to meet the challenges associated with increased dependency on advanced high technology in the OR.

References

1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. U. S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Career Guide to Industries, 2012-13 edition, 2010, http://www.bls.gov/ooh/about/career-guide-to-industries.htm, Accessed July 30, 2012.
2. E. G. Verdaasdonk, L. P. Stassen, M. van der Elst, T. M. Karsten, and J. Dankelman, “Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery: an observational study,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 21, pp. 275–279, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
3. G. Szeto, P. Ho, A. Ting, J. Poon, S. Cheng, and R. Tsang, “Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons,” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, vol. 19, pp. 175–184, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
4. J. R. Wilson and N. Corlett, Evaluation of Human Work, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 3rd edition, 2005.
5. L. S. Wauben, A. Albayrak, and R. H. M. Goossens, “Ergonomics in the Operating Room – An Overview,” in Ergonomics: Design, Integration, and Implementation, B. N. Brinkerhoff, Ed., pp. 79–118, Nova Science Publishers, NY, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
6. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Ergonomic Guidelines For Manual Material Handling, DHHS Publication No. 2007–131, US, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 2007.
7. R. Berguer, G. Rab, H. Abu-Ghaida, A. Alarcon, and J. Chung, “A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 11, pp. 139–142, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
8. R. Berguer, “Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 12, pp. 458–462, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
9. S. Koneczny, “The operating room: architectural conditions and potential hazards,” WORK, vol. 33, pp. 145–164, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
10. M. A. Van Veelen, E. A. L. Nederlof, R. H. M. Goossens, C. J. Schot, and J. J. Jakimowicz, “Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 17, pp. 1077–1081, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
11. M. Patkin, “History of ergonomy in surgery,” in New Aspects of High Technology in Medicine, H. P. Bruch, F. Kockerling, R. Bouchard, and C. Schuss-Pass, Eds., pp. 239–46, Monduzzi Editore, Hanover, Germany, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
12. R. Berguer, S. Gerber, G. Klipatrick, M. Remler, and D. A. Beckley, “Comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp,” Ergonomics, vol. 42, pp. 1634–1645, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
13. U. Matern and P. Waller, “Instruments for minimally invasive surgery: principles of ergonomic handles,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 13, pp. 174–182, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
14. G. B. Hanna, S. M. Shimi, and A. Cuschieri, “Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 227, pp. 481–484, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
15. M. A. Van Veelen, J. J. Jakimowicz, R. H. M. Goossens, D. W. Meijer, and J. B. Bussmann, “Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems during laparoscopy,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 16, pp. 674–678, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
16. R. Berguer, S. Gerber, G. Kilpatrick, and D. Beckley, “An ergonomic comparison of in-line vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 12, pp. 805–808, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
17. R. Berguer, D. L. Forkey, and W. D. Smith, “Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 466–468, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
18. R. H. M. Goossens and M. A. Van Veelen, “Assessment of ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery,” Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technology, vol. 10, pp. 175–179, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
19. M. O. Schurr, G. F. Buess, F. Wieth, H. J. Saile, and M. Botsch, “Ergonomic surgeon's chair for use during minimally invasive surgery,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 9, pp. 244–247, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
20. M. A. Van Veelen, D. W. Meijer, R. H. M. Goossens, and C. J. Snijders, “New ergonomic design criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forceps,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
21. M. A. Van Veelen, G. Kazemier, J. Koopman, R. H. M. Goossens, and D. W. Meijer, “Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
22. A. Albayrak, G. Kazemier, D. W. Meijer, and H. J. Bonjer, “Current state of ergonomics of Dutch hospitals in the endoscopic era,” Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 156–160, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
23. A. G. Gallagher and C. D. Smith, “Human-factors lessons learned from the minimally invasive surgery revolution,” Seminars in Laparoscopic Surgery, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 127–139, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
24. R. Berguer, “The application of ergonomics in the work environment of general surgeons,” Reviews on Environmental Health, vol. 12, pp. 99–106, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
25. H. C. Polk, D. S. Vitale, and M. Qadan, “The very busy urban surgeon: another face of the evermore obvious shortage of general surgeons,” The American College of Surgeons, vol. 209, pp. 144–147, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
26. A. Park, G. Lee, F. J. Seagull, N. Meenaghan, and D. Dexter, “Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: An impending epidemic,” The American College of Surgeons, vol. 210, no. 3, pp. 306–313, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
27. M. W. Stomberg, S. E. Tronstad, K. Hedberg et al., “Work-related musculoskeletal disorders when performing laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
28. B. Loring and E. A. Lemieux, “User research improves laparoscopic instruments,” Ergonomics in Design, vol. 18, pp. 18–23, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
29. K. H. Fuchs, “Minimally invasive surgery,” Endoscopy, vol. 34, pp. 154–159, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
30. G. Nilsson, S. Larsson, and F. Johnsson, “Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 87, pp. 873–878, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
31. R. Berguer, W. D. Smith, and Y. H. Chung, “Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 15, pp. 1204–1207, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
32. S. D. Schwaitzberg, C. Godinez, S. M. Kavic et al., “Training and working in high-stakes environments: lessons learned and problems shared by aviators and surgeons,” Surg Innov, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 187–195, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
33. B. Zheng, E. Rieder, M. A. Cassera et al., “Quantifying mental workloads of surgeons performing natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1352–1358, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
34. A. Alarcon and R. A. Berguer, “Comparison of operating room crowding between open and laparoscopic operations,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 10, pp. 916–919, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
35. T. Coles, D. Meglan, and N. John, “The role of haptics in medical training simulators: A survey of the state of the art,” IEEE Transactions on Haptics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–66, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
36. R. M. Satava, J. C. Bowersox, M. Mack, and T. M. Krummel, “Robotic surgery: state of the art and future trends,” Contemporary Surgery, vol. 57, pp. 489–499, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
37. U. Matern, “Ergonomic deficiencies in the operating room: examples from minimally invasive surgery,” WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, and Rehabilitation, vol. 33, pp. 165–168, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
38. U. Matern, G. Kuttler, C. Giebmeyer, P. Waller, and M. Faist, “Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1231–1241, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
39. R. Berguer, J. Chen, and W. D. Smith, “A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 138, pp. 967–970, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
40. T. A. Emam, G. Hanna, and A. Cuschieri, “Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 16, pp. 267–271, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
41. F. J. Pérez-Duarte, F. M. Sánchez-Margallo, I. Díaz-Güemes, M. A. Sánchez-Hurtado, M. Lucas-Hernández, and J. Usón Gargallo, “Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery and its importance in surgical training,” Cir Esp, 2011, June 22. View at: Google Scholar
42. P. P. Reddy, T. P. Reddy, J. Roig-Francoli et al., “The Impact of the Alexander technique on improving posture and surgical ergonomics during minimally invasive surgery: pilot study,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 186, no. 4, pp. 1658–1662, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
43. G. Szeto, S. Cheng, J. Poon, A. Ting, R. Tsang, and P. Ho, “Surgeons' static posture and movement repetitions in open and laparoscopic surgery,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. e19–e31, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
44. Y. Youssef, G. Lee, C. Godinez et al., “Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing position,” Surg Endosc, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 2168–2174, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
45. M. A. Van Veelen, J. J. Jakimowicz, and G. Kazemier, “Improved physical ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery,” Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 161–166, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
46. U. Matern, P. Waller, C. Giebmeyer, K. Ruckauer, and E. Farthmann, “Ergonomics: requirements for adjusting the height of the laparoscopic operating tables,” Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 5, pp. 7–12, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
47. R. Berguer, W. D. Smith, and S. Davis, “An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 16, pp. 416–421, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
48. L. Kranenburg and D. Gossot, “Ergonomic problems encountered during video-assisted thoracic surgery,” Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 147–155, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
49. N. T. Nguyen, H. S. Ho, W. D. Smith et al., “An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons' axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 182, no. 6, pp. 720–724, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
50. L. S. Wauben, M. A. Van Veelen, D. Gossot, and R. H. M. Goossens, “Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire amongst 284 surgeons,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1268–1274, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
51. J. Zehetner, A. Kaltenbacher, W. Wayand, and A. Shamiyeh, “Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery.,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 20, pp. 139–141, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
52. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1997, http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/97-141/, Accessed August 31, 2012.
53. U. Matern and S. Koneczny, “Safety, hazards and ergonomics in the operating Room,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 21, pp. 1965–1969, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
54. J. C. Lotz, “The suffering surgeon,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 11:548, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
55. T. A. Emam, T. G. Frank, G. B. Hanna, and A. Cuschieri, “Influence of handle design on the surgeon's upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturing,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 15, pp. 667–672, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
56. P. V. Patil, G. B. Hanna, T. G. Frank, and A. Cuschieri, “Effect of fixation of shoulder and elbow joint movement on the precision of laparoscopic instrument manipulations,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 19, pp. 366–368, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
57. M. L. Uhrich, R. A. Underwood, J. W. Standeven, N. J. Soper, and J. R. Engsberg, “Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 16, pp. 635–639, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
58. N. Y. Mehta, R. S. Haluck, M. I. Frecker, and A. J. Snyder, “Sequence and task analysis of instrument use in common laparoscopic procedures,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 16, pp. 280–285, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
59. C. J. Lin, H. J. Chen, and Y. C. Lo, “Ergonomic investigation of weight distribution of laparoscopic instruments,” Journal of Laparoendosc Advanced Surgical Technology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 411–415, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
60. D. A. G. Reyes, B. Tang, and A. Cuschieri, “Minimal access surgery (MAS)-related surgeon morbidity syndromes,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 20, pp. 1–13, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
61. R. Berguer and A. Hrelijac, “The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: a survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 18, pp. 508–512, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
62. W. J. Lee and Y. S. Chae, “Superficial nerve damage of thumb of laparoscopic surgeon,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 11, pp. 207–208, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
63. G. R. Verma, “Pressure sore and digital neuropraxia of the thumb in laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 14, pp. 178–179, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
64. N. E. Quick, J. C. Gillette, R. Shapiro, G. L. Adrales, D. Gerlach, and A. E. Park, “The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive training procedures,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 17, pp. 462–465, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
65. M. A. Van Veelen, C. J. Snijders, E. Van Leeuwen, R. H. Goossens, and G. Kazemier, “Improvement of foot pedals used during surgery based on new ergonomic guidelines,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1086–1091, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
66. K. T. den Boer, J. L. Herder, W. Sjoerdsma, D. W. Meijer, D. J. Gouma, and H. G. Stassen, “Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors: what can you feel?” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 869–873, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
67. M. A. Van Veelen, D. W. Meijer, I. Uijttewaal, R. H. M. Goossens, C. J. Snijders, and G. Kazemier, “Improvement of the laparoscopic needle holder based on new ergonomic guidelines,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 17, pp. 699–703, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
68. U. Matern, M. Faist, K. Kehl, C. Giebmeyer, and G. Buess, “Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 19, pp. 436–440, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
69. A. Sheikhzadeh, C. Gore, J. Zuckerman, and M. Nordin, “Perioperating nurses and technicians' perceptions of ergonomic risk factors in the surgical environment,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 40, pp. 833–839, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
70. A. Gerbrands, A. Albayrak, and G. Kazemier, “Ergonomic evaluation of the work area of the scrub nurse,” Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 142–146, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
71. Y. S. Chang, Y. H. Wu, C. Y. Hsu, S. H. Tang, L. L. Yang, and S. F. Su, “Impairment of perceptual and motor abilities at the end of a night shift is greater in nurses working fast rotating shifts,” Sleep Medicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 866–869, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
72. P. L. Johnston, “Occupational stress in the operating theatre suite: should employers be concerned?” Australian Health Review, vol. 22, pp. 60–80, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
73. M. A. Sauter, D. Boyle, D. Wallace et al., “Psychometric evaluation of the Organizational Job Satisfaction Scale,” J. Nurs. Meas., vol. 5, pp. 53–69, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
74. N. J. Girard, “Does violence still occur in the OR?” AORN J., vol. 80, pp. 407–408, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
75. K. H. E. Kroemer, H. B. Kroemer, and K. E. Kroemer-Elbert, Ergonomics: How to Design for Ease and Efficiency, Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey, 2nd edition, 2001.
76. S. I. Brown, T. G. Frank, A. Cuschieri, R. Sharpe, and C. Cartwright, “Optimization of the projection screen in a display system for minimal access surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 17, pp. 1251–1255, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
77. S. I. Brown, C. White, K. Wipat, G. B. Hanna, T. G. Frank, and A. Cuschieri, “Characterizing the, "Gold Standard" image for laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 18, pp. 1192–1195, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
78. A. Szold, “Seeing is believing: visualization systems in endoscopic surgery (video, HDTV, stereoscopy, and beyond),” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 730–733, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
79. M. A. Van Veelen, D. W. Meijer, R. H. M. Goossens, C. J. Snijders, and J. J. Jakimowicz, “Improved usability of a new handle design for laparoscopic dissection forceps,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 16, pp. 201–207, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
80. R. Lafreniere, R. Berguer, P. Seifert et al., “Preparation of the operating room,” ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice, pp. 1–14, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
81. E. Sutton, Y. Youssef, N. Meenaghan et al., “Gaze disruptions experienced by the laparoscopic operating surgeon,” Surg Endosc, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1240–1244, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
82. R. Franson, F. H. Khabbaz, A. Kapoor, and A. Patriciu, “A system for laparoscopic surgery ergonomics and skills evaluation,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1111–1114, 2011. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2012 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.