Research Article
A Kalman Filtering and Nonlinear Penalty Regression Approach for Noninvasive Anemia Detection with Palpebral Conjunctiva Images
Table 1
Performance comparison between the methods with and without KF.
| | Sensitivity | Specificity | Number of suspect samples | Sensitivity change | Specificity change | Number of suspect samples change |
| R + linear regression (adopted from [38]) | 0.8333 | 0.8261 | 65 | +2.86% | −6.62% | −32.31% | KF + R + linear regression (adopted from [38]) | 0.8571 | 0.7714 | 44 | Erythema index + linear regression [10] | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 74 | 0% | −4.35% | −24.34% | KF + erythema index + linear regression [10] | 1.0000 | 0.9565 | 56 | Hue + nonlinear penalty regression [39] | NAN | NAN | 100 | NAN | NAN | −42% | KF + hue + nonlinear penalty regression [39] | 0.8462 | 0.5862 | 58 | R + nonlinear penalty regression | 0.7647 | 0.8158 | 45 | −0.36% | −0.89% | −28.89% | KF + R + nonlinear penalty regression (proposed algorithm) | 0.7619 | 0.8085 | 32 |
|
|
NAN: there is no data, which means all test samples are considered to be suspect samples.
|