Research Article
Strategic Improvement for Quality and Satisfaction of Hospital Information Systems
Table 5
Reliability and validity.
| Constructs | Items | Loadings | CR | AVE | Full sample/low satisfaction/high satisfaction |
| System quality (SQ) [10, 33] | SQ1 | 0.86/0.83/0.81 | 0.90/0.87/0.85 | 0.75/0.69/0.65 | SQ2 | 0.85/0.80/0.78 | SQ3 | 0.89/0.87/0.83 |
| Information quality (IQ) [11, 33] | IQ1 | 0.87/0.74/0.90 | 0.93/0.89/0.94 | 0.83/0.73/0.84 | IQ2 | 0.94/0.91/0.93 | IQ3 | 0.92/0.90/0.92 |
| Service quality (SEQ) [10, 15] | SEQ1 | 0.89/0.80/0.89 | 0.93/0.87/0.92 | 0.76/0.63/0.75 | SEQ2 | 0.90/0.84/0.91 | SEQ3 | 0.83/0.74/0.77 | SEQ4 | 0.88/0.78/0.89 |
| Satisfaction (SAT) [12] | SAT1 | 0.93/0.83/0.80 | 0.96/0.90/0.75 | 0.84/0.64/0.74 | SAT2 | 0.88/0.65/0.85 | SAT3 | 0.93/0.85/0.87 | SAT4 | 0.96/0.89/0.93 | SAT5 | 0.89/0.77/0.85 |
|
|
Note. CR denotes composite reliability; AVE denotes average variance extracted.
|