Research Article
Local Binary Patterns Descriptor Based on Sparse Curvelet Coefficients for False-Positive Reduction in Mammograms
Table 8
Comparison of classification accuracy, AUC, and FP/image values from different approaches in breast cancer diagnosis.
| Author | Database | Method | Classifier | Result | AUC | FP/image |
| Eltoukhy et al. [33] | MIAS | Biggest curvelet coefficients as a feature vector | Euclidean classifier | 94.07% | — | — | Eltoukhy et al. [42] | 98.59 | — | — | Eltoukhy et al. [8] | SVM | 97.3 | — | — | Dhahbi et al. [34] | Mini-MIAS | Curvelet moments | KNN | 91.27 | — | — | DDSM | 86.46 | — | — | Bruno et al. [4] | DDSM | Curvelet + LBP | SVM | 85 | 0.85 | — | PL | 94 | 0.94 | — | da Rocha et al. [40] | DDSM | LBP | SVM | 88.31 | 0.88 | — | Kanadam and Chereddy [3] | MIAS | Sparse ROI | SVM | 97.42 | — | — | Pereira et al. [18] | DDSM | Wavelet and Wiener filter | Multiple thresholding, wavelet, and GA | — | — | 1.37 | Liu and Zeng [29] | DDSM, FFDM | GLCM, CLBP, and geometric features | SVM | — | — | 1.48 | De Sampaio et al. [39] | DDSM | LBP | DBSCAN | 98.26 | | 0.19 | Zyout et al. [30] | DDSM | Second order statistics of wavelet coefficients (SOSWC) | SVM | 96.8 | 0.97 | 0.018 | MIAS | 95.2 | 96.6 | 0.029 | Casti et al. [31] | DDSM | Differential features | Fisher linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) | — | — | 1.68 | MIAS | 2.12 | FFDM | 0.82 | Proposed method | MIAS | LBP based on sparse curvelet subband coefficients | ANN | 98.57 | 0.98 | 0.01 | DDSM | 98.70 | 0.98 | 0.03 | TMCH: Scanner1 | 98.30 | 0.98 | 0.05 | TMCH: Scanner2 | 100 | 1 | 0 |
|
|