Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 6874765, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6874765
Research Article

Comparison of Machine-Learning Classification Models for Glaucoma Management

1R&D Division, Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
2Cloud-Based Eye Disease Diagnosis Joint Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Photonics, RIKEN, Wako, Japan
3Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
4Image Processing Research Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Photonics, RIKEN, Wako, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Masahiro Akiba; pj.oc.nocpot@abika-m

Received 27 December 2017; Revised 6 April 2018; Accepted 18 April 2018; Published 19 June 2018

Academic Editor: Altaf Hussain

Copyright © 2018 Guangzhou An et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Nakazawa, “Ocular blood flow and influencing factors for glaucoma,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. T. Nicolela and S. M. Drance, “Various glaucomatous optic nerve appearances: clinical correlations,” Ophthalmology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 640–649, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. K. Omodaka, N. Takada, T. Yamaguchi, H. Takahashi, M. Araie, and T. Nakazawa, “Characteristic correlations of the structure-function relationship in different glaucomatous disc types,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 223–229, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Nakazawa, M. Shimura, M. Ryu et al., “Progression of visual field defects in eyes with different optic disc appearances in patients with normal tension glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 426–430, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Nakazawa, N. Chiba, K. Omodaka et al., “Association between optic nerve blood flow and objective examinations in glaucoma patients with generalized enlargement disc type,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 5, pp. 1549–1556, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. J. Kim, K. J. Cho, and S. Oh, “Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 5, Article ID e0177726, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Chan, T. W. Lee, P. A. Sample, M. H. Goldbaum, R. N. Weinreb, and T. J. Sejnowski, “Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 963–974, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Bizios, A. Heijl, J. L. Hougaar, and B. Bengtsson, “Machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis based on classification of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness parameters measured by Stratus OCT,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. K. Leung, W. M. Chan, Y. L. Hui et al., “Analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head in glaucoma with different reference plane offsets, using optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 891–899, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Takada, K. Omodaka, T. Kikawa et al., “OCT-based quantification and classification of optic disc structure in glaucoma patients,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 8, Article ID e0160226, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Omodaka, G. An, S. Tsuda et al., “Classification of optic disc shape in glaucoma using machine learning based on quantified ocular parameters,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 12, Article ID e0190012, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Q. Yang, C. A. Reisman, A. Wang et al., “Automated layer segmentation of macular OCT images using dual-scale gradient information,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 20, pp. 21293–21307, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Peng, F. Long, and C. Ding, “Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1226–1238, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Yang and V. Hanovar, “Feature subset selection using genetic algorithm,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 44–49, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. E. Akadi, A. Amine, A. E. Ouardighi, and D. Aboutajdine, “A two-stage gene selection scheme utilizing MRMR filter and GA wrapper,” Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 487–500, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Milne, “Feature selection using neural networks contribution measures,” in Proceedings of the Eighth Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Canberra, ACT, Australia, November 1995.
  17. C. S. Lee, A. J. Tyring, N. P. Deruyter, Y. Wu, A. Rokem, and A. Y. Lee, “Deep-learning based, automated segmentation of macular edema in optical coherence tomography,” Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 3440–3448, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. S. W. Ting, C. Y. L. Cheung, G. Lim et al., “Development and validation of a deep learning system for diabetic retinopathy and related eye diseases using retinal images from multiethnic populations with diabetes,” JAMA, vol. 318, no. 22, pp. 2211–2223, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Rahimy, “Deep learning applications in ophthalmology,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 254–260, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar