An Orthopaedic Robotic-Assisted Rehabilitation Method of the Forearm in Virtual Reality Physiotherapy

Table 2

Clinical characteristics of the patients’ population of the pilot study.

Patient	Gender	Age	Fracture injury	Injury treatment	Flex (deg)	Ext (deg)	FE RoM (deg)	Pron (deg)	Sup (deg)	PS RoM (deg)	JAMAR test	VAS test	DASH test
P1	M	24	Humerus, radius and ulna	Operative with internal fixation	138	36	102	78	48	109	14	2	71.33
P2	W	87	Humerus, radius and ulna	Operative with internal fixation	135	40	95	22	87	126	0	1	54.33
P3	M	66	Radius, capitate	Nonoperative with a fixed splint	115	10	105	26	95	121	16	4	63.33
P4	W	35	Humerus, radius and ulna	Operative with internal fixation	100	−5	105	70	40	110	0	5	53.33
P5	W	22	Distal epifisi, radius, ulnar styloid, scaphoid	Operative with internal fixation	128	31	97	80	30	110	15	6	47,41
P6	M	42	Humerus	Operative for removal of internal fixation	90	−5	95	78	55	133	48	6	49.17
P7	M	45	Humerus, radius and ulna	Operative with internal fixation	124	12	112	52	55	107	36	7	50
P8	W	60	Epifisi, radius, ulnar styloid, scaphoid	Nonoperative with a fixed splint	—	—	—	68	56	124	5	5	67.50
P9	M	58	Capitate	Nonoperative with a fixed splint	—	—	—	52	57	109	0	5	77.67
P10	M	33	Radius, capitate	Operative with internal fixation	—	—	—	62	75	137	20	2	48.5