Review Article

High Tibial Osteotomy: Review of Techniques and Biomechanics

Table 2

Comparison of the clinical results between open-wedge (OWHTO) and closed-wedge (CWHTO).

YearPapersPatientsOWHTOCWHTO
OWCW

2014Duivenvoorden et al. [50]4547More complicationsMore early conversions to total knee arthroplasty with six years
2014Van Egmond [51]2525Patella baja leads to patellofemoral complaints and worse resultsBetter satisfactory and score with an average of 7.9 years
2014Deie et al. [52]912Reduced knee varus moment and lateral thrustLittle effect on reducing lateral thrust
2015Duivenvoorden et al. [53]112354Higher survival ratio, 15% serious adverse events, 13% adverse events13% serious adverse events, 6% adverse events
2016Sun et al. [19]740743Increased the posterior slope angle and limb length; decreased the patellar height; higher accuracy of correctionHigher incidence of opposite cortical fracture
2017Wu et al. [54]12741308Wider range of motion; greater posterior tibial slope angle; lesser patellar heightNo significant difference in HKA and mean angle of correction
2018Lee et al. [55]127175The increase in leg length had a positive correlation with the degree of correctionThe decrease in leg length was negligible