Research Article

Comparison of Biomechanical Performance of Five Different Treatment Approaches for Fixing Posterior Pelvic Ring Injury

Table 3

Material properties, element types, and cross-sectional area of ligaments in the FE model.

LigamentsStrain (%)Stiffness (N/mm)Strain (%)Stiffness (N/mm)Area (mm2)Reference

Anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL)0 < ε < 12.2347ε ≥ 12.278732.4Moramarco et al. [34]
Rohlmann et al. [38]
Naserkhaki et al. [37]
Posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL)0 < ε < 11.2295ε ≥ 11.26175.2
Sacrotuberous ligament (STL)0 < ε < 18.2467ε ≥ 18.298842.85
Sacrospinous ligament (SSL)0 < ε < 13.9387ε ≥ 13.989735.6
Anterior sacroiliac ligament (ASL)0 < ε < 22.1454ε ≥ 22.1887112
Posterior sacroiliac ligament (PSL)0 < ε < 21.8398ε ≥ 21.887696
Sacroiliac interosseous ligament (SIL)0 < ε < 17.2412ε ≥ 17.293239
Iliolumbar ligament (ILL)0 < ε < 18.5432ε ≥ 18.595721